Thrombosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Single Center Experience of Using Whole Blood Platelet Aggregation Studies for Risk Assessment and Thromboprophylaxis.

CONCLUSION: Routine use of WBPA studies enables safe and effective risk-adapted thromboprophylaxis in MPN patients, irrespective of the underlying driver mutation and their risk predicted by the IPSET- thrombosis criteria.

Incidence of Device-Related Thrombosis in Watchman Patients Undergoing a Genotype-Guided Antithrombotic Strategy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report the incidence of device-related thrombosis (DRT) and thromboembolic (TE) events when an alternative to clopidogrel is prescribed in loss-of-function (LOF) allele carriers of the cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) gene. BACKGROUND: LOF polymorphisms of the CYP2C19 gene are associated with reduced hepatic bioactivation of clopidogrel. METHODS: A total of 1,002 Watchman patients were included. Six hundred forty-five patients underwent CYP2C19 genetic testing; among patients with clopidogrel resistance, clopidogrel was replaced by either prasugrel (pilot cohort) or half dose direct oral anticoagulant ([DOAC]/Group 1), both in combination with aspirin. We compared the incidence of DRT/TE events among genotyped patients and a control group which received standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (Group 2; n = 357). All reported events occurred during a timeframe between 45- and 180-day follow-up transesophageal echocardiograms, when the 2 different antithrombotic strategies (genotype-guided vs standard DAPT) were adopted. RESULTS: In the pilot cohort (n = 244), bleeding events occurred in 10.2% of patients who received aspirin plus prasugrel, leading to early discontinuation of the prasugrel-based protocol. DOAC Group 1 patients (n = 401), 25.7% were reduced metabolizers, and clopidogrel was replaced by half dose direct oral anticoagulant. DRT was documented in 1 (0.2%) patient of Group 1 and 7 (1.96%) patients of Group 2 (log-rank P = 0.021). The composite endpoint of DRT/TE events was significantly lower among patients receiving a genotype-guided antithrombotic strategy (0.75% vs 3.10%; log-rank P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In Watchman patients, a genotype-based antithrombotic strategy with aspirin plus half dose DOAC in reduced clopidogrel metabolizers was superior to standard DAPT with respect to DRT/TE events.

Assessment of acquired hemophilia patient demographics in the United States: the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society Registry.

The Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society (HTRS) Registry was used to monitor the postapproval use of recombinant factor VIIa. The objective of this manuscript is to provide key insights on the demographics of patients with acquired hemophilia in the HTRS Registry. Acquired hemophilia patient registration in HTRS captured age; sex; comorbidities and predisposing conditions; first bleeding location; laboratory parameters; exposure to blood products, factor, and bypassing agents; and initiation of immune suppression/tolerance therapy. Overall, 166 patients with acquired hemophilia were registered in HTRS (83 women, 73 men, median age 70 years); the majority were non-Hispanic whites (61.4%). The most common comorbidities were autoimmune disease (28.4%) and malignancy (14.5%). The most common first site of bleeding was subcutaneous (27.1%); this was more common in whites (29.1%) than blacks (12.5%) and in non-Hispanics (26.4%) than Hispanics (11.8%). Blood product exposure was reported for 33.1% of patients; the most commonly reported product was packed red blood cells (28%). Of the 57 patients with outcome data available for immune tolerance therapy, 26 patients (46%) reported successful treatment, 13 reported unsuccessful treatment (23%), and 18 (32%) were receiving active treatment at the time of registration. The HTRS Registry final analysis provides the only current comprehensive look at acquired hemophilia in the US population, including details on underlying autoimmune diseases and malignancies. Pertinent to recognition and diagnosis of the disease, subcutaneous bleeding as a presenting bleeding symptom was more common in white and non-Hispanic individuals.

Assessment of platelet-derived thrombogenicity with the total thrombus-formation analysis system in coronary artery disease patients receiving antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of thrombogenicity helps to prevent thrombosis and excessive bleeding. The total thrombus-formation analysis system (T-TAS) was developed for quantitative analysis of platelet thrombus formation by the use of microchips with thrombogenic surfaces (collagen, platelet chip [PL-chip]; collagen plus tissue factor, atherome chip [AR-chip]). We examined the utility of the T-TAS in the assessment of the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study, 372 consecutive patients admitted to the cardiovascular department were divided into three groups: patients not receiving any antiplatelet therapy (control, n = 56), patients receiving aspirin only (n = 69), and patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel (n = 149). Blood samples were used for the T-TAS to measure the platelet thrombus-formation area under the curve (AUC) at various shear rates (1500 s(-1) [PL18 -AUC10 ] and 2000 s(-1) [PL24 -AUC10 ] for the PL-chip; 300 s(-1) [AR10 -AUC30 ] for the AR-chip). The on-clopidogrel platelet aggregation was measured by the use of P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) with the VerifyNow system. The mean PL24 -AUC10 levels were 358 ± 111 (± standard deviation) (95% confidence interval [CI] 328.9-387.1) in the control group, 256 ± 108 (95% CI 230.5-281.5) in the aspirin group, and 113 ± 91 (95% CI 98.4-127.6) in the aspirin/clopidogrel group. In the aspirin/clopidogrel group, the PL24 -AUC10 was higher in poor metabolizers (PMs) with cytochrome P450 2C19(CYP2C19) polymorphisms (152 ± 112, 95% CI 103.4-200.6) than in the non-PM group (87 ± 74, 95% CI 73.8-100.2). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the PL24 -AUC10 level measured by the T-TAS is a potentially suitable index for the assessment of antiplatelet therapy in CAD patients.

It is time to change thrombosis risk assessment for PV and ET?

Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms to be diagnosed according to the WHO classification. Molecular profiling must include the analysis of JAK2 (looking for the V617F point-mutation in PV and ET, screening exon 12 for mutations only in V617F-negative PV), CALR and MPL mutations (both in V617F-negative ET). The current risk stratification to predict thrombosis requires two parameters: age over 60 years and prior history of thrombosis. On the basis of these two risk factors patients can be stratified in low-risk and high-risk and receive a proper treatment. However, a modern stratification of thrombotic risk might consider "new" low-risk patients: conventional low-risk plus absence of leukocytosis from diagnosis onwards and a hematocrit level below 45% during the course of disease for PV; conventional low-risk plus absence of leukocytosis from diagnosis onwards, JAK2 negativity, CALR positivity, and absence of cardiovascular risk factors for ET.

Implementing family health history risk stratification in primary care: impact of guideline criteria on populations and resource demand.

UNLABELLED: The Genomic Medicine Model aims to facilitate patient engagement, patient/provider education of genomics/personalized medicine, and uptake of risk-stratified evidence-based prevention guidelines using MeTree, a patient-facing family health history (FHH) collection and clinical decision support (CDS) program. Here we report the number of increased risk (above population-level risk) patients identified for breast/ovarian cancer, colon cancer, hereditary syndrome risk, and thrombosis; the prevalence of FHH elements triggering increased-risk status; and the resources needed to manage their risk. STUDY DESIGN: hybrid implementation-effectiveness study of adults with upcoming well-visits in 2 primary care practices in Greensboro, NC. PARTICIPANTS: 1,184, mean age = 58.8, female = 58% (N = 694), non-white = 20% (N = 215). Increased Risk: 44% (N = 523). RECOMMENDATIONS: genetic counseling = 26% (N = 308), breast MRI = 0.8% (N = 10), breast chemoprophylaxis = 5% (N = 58), early/frequent colonoscopies = 19% (N = 221), ovarian cancer screening referral = 1% (N = 14), thrombosis testing/counseling = 2.4% (N = 71). FHH elements: 8 FHH elements lead to 37.3% of the increased risk categorizations (by frequency): first-degree-relative (FDR) with polyps age ≥60 (7.1%, N = 85), three relatives with Lynch-related cancers (5.4%, N = 65), FDR with polyps age <60 (5.1%, N = 61), three relatives on same side of family with same cancer (4.9%, N = 59), Gail score ≥1.66% (4.9%, N = 58), two relatives with breast cancer (one ≤age 50) (4.1%, N = 49), one relative with breast cancer ≤age 40 (4.1%, N = 48), FDR with colon cancer age ≥60 (1.7%, N = 20). MeTree identifies a high percentage of individuals in the general primary care population needing non-routine risk management/prevention for the selected conditions. Implementing risk-stratification in primary care will likely increase demand for related-resources, particularly colon screening and GC. Understanding the prevalence of FHH elements helps predict resource needs and may aid in guideline development.

Genetic testing in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: The CYP2C19 genotype is a predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with clopidogrel. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a CYP2C19*2 genotype-guided strategy of antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients undergoing PCI, compared with two 'no testing' strategies (empiric clopidogrel or prasugrel). METHODS: We developed a Markov model to compare three strategies. The model captured adverse cardiovascular events and antiplatelet-related complications. Costs were expressed in 2010 US dollars and estimated using diagnosis-related group codes and Medicare reimbursement rates. The net wholesale price for prasugrel was estimated as $5.45 per day. A generic estimate for clopidogrel of $1.00 per day was used and genetic testing was assumed to cost $500. RESULTS: Base case analyses demonstrated little difference between treatment strategies. The genetic testing-guided strategy yielded the most QALYs and was the least costly. Over 15 months, total costs were $18 lower with a gain of 0.004 QALY in the genotype-guided strategy compared with empiric clopidogrel, and $899 lower with a gain of 0.0005 QALY compared with empiric prasugrel. The strongest predictor of the preferred strategy was the relative risk of thrombotic events in carriers compared with wild-type individuals treated with clopidogrel. Above a 47% increased risk, a genotype-guided strategy was the dominant strategy. Above a clopidogrel cost of $3.96 per day, genetic testing was no longer dominant but remained cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Among ACS patients undergoing PCI, a genotype-guided strategy yields similar outcomes to empiric approaches to treatment, but is marginally less costly and more effective.

Should we be applying warfarin pharmacogenetics to clinical practice? No, not now.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration modified warfarin labeling in 2007 to suggest, but not mandate, pharmacogenetic testing. Genetic analysis is now commercially available. However, results predict only one third of all dosing variation, the value of testing in reducing bleeding and thrombosis rates remains unproved, and cost-effectiveness is not established. Careful consideration of clinical factors that influence dosing, conscientious prothrombin time monitoring, and sage dosage adjustment remain paramount in warfarin management. Further study is required before routine warfarin pharmacogenetic testing can be recommended.

Modifying murine von Willebrand factor A1 domain for in vivo assessment of human platelet therapies.

The A1 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF-A1) plays a crucial role in hemostasis and thrombosis by initiating platelet adhesion at sites of arterial injury through interactions with the platelet receptor glycoprotein Ib alpha (GPIbalpha). Here we report that murine VWF-A1 supports limited binding of human platelets. However, atomic models of GPIbalpha-VWF-A1 complexes identified an electrostatic 'hot-spot' that, when mutated in murine VWF-A1, switches its binding specificity from mouse to human GPIbalpha. Furthermore, mice expressing this mutant VWF-A1 display a bleeding phenotype that can be corrected by infusion of human platelets. Mechanistically, human platelets correct the phenotype by forming occlusive thrombi, an event that can be abrogated by blockade of GPIbalpha or by the preadministration of inhibitors of platelet activation or adhesion (clopidogrel (Plavix) and abciximab (ReoPro), respectively). Thus, by modifying a protein interface, we have generated a potential biological platform for preclinical screening of antithrombotics that specifically target human platelets.

Oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, thrombophilias and risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) Study.

Combined oral contraceptives, oral hormone replacement therapy and thrombophilias are recognised risk factors for venous thromboembolism in women. The objective of this study was to assess the risk of thromboembolism among women with thrombophilia who are taking oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy, conducting a systematic review and metaanalysis. Of 201 studies identified, only nine met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies included pre-menopausal women on oral contraceptives and two studies included peri-menopausal women on hormone replacement therapy. For oral contraceptive use, significant associations of the risk of venous thromboembolism were found in women with factor V Leiden (OR 15.62; 95%CI 8.66 to 28.15); deficiencies of antithrombin (OR 12.60; 95%CI 1.37 to 115.79), protein C (OR 6.33; 95%CI 1.68 to 23.87), or protein S (OR 4.88; 95%CI 1.39 to 17.10), elevated levels of factor VIIIc (OR 8.80; 95%CI 4.13 to 18.75); and factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A (OR 7.85; 95%CI 1.65 to 37.41). For hormone replacement therapy, a significant association was found in women with factor V Leiden (OR 13.16; 95%CI 4.28 to 40.47). Although limited by the small number of studies, the findings of this study support the presence of interaction between thrombophilia and venous thromboembolism among women taking oral contraceptives. However, further studies are required to establish with greater confidence the associations of these, and other, thrombophilias with venous thromboembolism among hormone users.

Assessment of the coagulation profile in hemato-oncological patients receiving ATG-based conditioning treatment for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is increasingly used in pre-allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) conditioning regimens to prevent graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease. However, ATG was also found to be associated with increased incidence of thrombosis during organ transplantation. In the present study, we tested the coagulation status of 21 patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allo-SCT who received ATG-based (11 patients) or non-ATG-based (10) conditioning treatment. We assessed several thrombophilia markers as well as circulating total and endothelial microparticles (TMP/EMP) and soluble CD40 ligand (CD40L). No significant difference in the mean values of prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, antithrombin, protein C, protein S, thrombin-antithrombin III complex, homocysteine levels, prevalence of genetic thrombophilia markers and levels of EMP, TMP or CD40L was observed between the ATG-treated and ATG-untreated patients, as well as before and after conditioning in each group separately. Platelet counts decreased significantly in ATG-treated patients; however, this decrease was not associated with clinical or laboratory evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation. No patient developed thromboembolic event or veno-occlusive liver disease. Our results suggest that allo-SCT is not associated with increased hypercoagulability and addition of ATG to conditioning regimen has no significant procoagulant effect.

Protein C and protein S assessment in hospital laboratories: which strategy and what role for DNA sequencing?

This paper presents a critical assessment of protein C (PC) and protein S (PS) functional and immunological approaches with regard to DNA sequencing in a large hospital recruitment for thrombosis exploration in more than 1700 consecutive patients. After examination of clinical status and PC and PS phenotype, a genotypic study was implemented for 17 PC-deficient and 28 PS-deficient patients (activity < 70%). Sixty-five percent of the genotyped PC-deficient patients were found to have heterozygous mutations. Among the < 70% values, decreases in PC activity without gene mutation were always slight (mean value 64 +/- 7%) while patients presenting a PC gene mutation had a mean 50 +/- 17% activity (P < 0.05). Among the eight PC mutations found, only one has previously been described. A novel mutation in the promoter region (-1522), located in the HNF-1 site and associated with the Y226H heterozygous mutation, was found in a 9-month-old girl with 4% PC activity. Determination of PS functional activity was considerably improved by contemporaneous measurement of calibration and samples in a single step. Only 50% of the genotyped PS-deficient patients demonstrated heterozygous alterations of the gene. The benefit of sequencing to identify putative causal mutations was only 39% in PS-deficient women, while it was 90% in men. Among the nine PS mutations found, six have not yet been published. In the present paper, we explain our methodological choices and diagnostic strategy.

A rapid and cost-effective method for analysis of three common genetic risk factors for thrombosis.

A simple, rapid and cost-effective method for the analysis of three of the most widely screened genetic risk factors for thrombosis has been established. The protocol developed uses blood spots stored on filter paper (Guthrie spots) as well as DNA extracted from anticoagulated blood. The use of Guthrie spots taken at birth enables the retrospective study of patients who develop thrombotic complications without necessitating resampling. Following isolation of DNA, conventional fluorescence-labelled polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is performed using a thermostable DNA polymerase. Denatured, single-stranded PCR products are analysed on a semi-automated capillary-based genetic analyser, the data being stored electronically. This sensitive protocol obviates the need for endonuclease digestion and the associated gel running and documentation, and leads to a reduction in the recurrent costs of laboratory consumables.

Activated protein C resistance assay when applied in the general population.

We estimated the predictive values of activated protein C resistance in the diagnosis of women who are carriers of factor V Leiden. When the prevalence of factor V Leiden is 2%, the positive predictive value is 44% and the cost of preventing one thromboembolic death is $44,180,000. Thus the activated protein C resistance assay is not cost-effective in ruling out factor V Leiden in this population.

[Risk of thrombosis with oral contraceptives: value of a thrombophilia screening test]. / Thromboserisiko bei oralen Kontrazeptiva: Stellenwert eines Thrombophilie-Screenings.

Oral contraceptives increase the natural incidence of venous thrombosis of 1-2/10,000 women per year 3- to 4-fold. Recent studies have shown that desogestrel or gestodene containing formulations bear twice the risk of older low-dose ovulation inhibitors. During pregnancy, the incidence of thrombosis rises to 10/10,000 women-years and post partum up to 40/ 10,000. For 60% of thromboses no causal explanation can be found. In approximately 40% of the patients an inherited thrombophilia can be presumed. Among the hereditary types of thrombophilia, a resistance to activated protein C (APC-resistance) represents nearly 50%, while in 15 to 20% a deficiency of antithrombin III, protein C or protein S is found. APC-resistance, with a prevalence of 3-5% in the general population, increases the risk of thrombosis 8-fold and in users of oral contraceptives 35-fold. Antithrombin III-deficiency carries a comparable risk. Protein C-deficiency increases the risk of thrombosis 9-fold and in users of oral contraceptives 15-fold. Ovulation inhibitors do not influence the risk of thrombosis in women with protein S-deficiency. Anti-phospholipid-antibodies increase during treatment with oral contraceptives and represent a considerably enhanced risk of thrombosis. Inherent thrombophilia is suspected in a patient with a positive history or family history of thrombosis, especially with thrombosis before the age of 40 or with atypical localisation. Even in these risk groups, the cost-benefit ratio of selective screening is unfavorable, as today at most 70% of the hereditary thrombophilias can be diagnosed by laboratory analysis, and only very few of the patients will actually experience a thrombotic event: only 3 of 1000 carriers of APC-resistance will suffer from thrombosis during oral contraception. On the other hand, a negative result of laboratory tests does not exclude a hereditary thrombophilic disorder. At present, it is unclear whether a selective screening process is superior to a careful assessment of individual and family history. A general screening, however, cannot be justified because of the unfavorable cost/benefit ratio. If the individual or family history or pathological laboratory parameters indicate an increased risk of thrombosis, this risk has to be carefully weighed against the consequences of discontinuation of pill use. Those few individuals with risk factors who will experience a thrombo-embolic event, cannot be identified in advance. If oral contraceptives represent a particularly high risk in patients with thrombophilic disorders and/or other risk factors, other contraceptive methods should be considered. If a patient with risk factors decides on the use of oral contraceptives, she must be informed that in the case of symptoms indicating a thrombosis, a physician should be consulted immediately. The earlier an appropriate therapy is initiated, the more effectively pulmonary thrombo-embolism and permanent damage, such as the post-phlebitic syndrome, can be prevented.