Why the Indian Health Care Improvement Act Has Failed to Effectively Fund Workforce Development for the Indian Health Service.

The Indian Health Service (IHS) faces severe workforce shortages due to underfunding and underdevelopment of clinical training programs. Unlike other direct federal health care systems that have implemented clinical training paradigms as central parts of their success, the IHS has no formalized process for developing such programs internally or in partnership with academic institutions. While the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA) authorizes mechanisms by which the IHS can support overall workforce development, a critical portion of the act (U.S. Code 1616p) intended for developing clinical training programs within the agency remains unfunded. Here, we review the funding challenges of the IHCIA, as well as its authorized and funded workforce development programs that have only partially addressed workforce shortages. We propose that through additional funding to 1616p, the IHS could implement clinical training programs needed to prepare a larger workforce more capable of meeting the needs of American Indian/Alaska Native communities.

Tribal Perspectives on Patient Navigation for Rural Native Veterans Using Veteran Health Administration Services.

American Indian and Alaska Native (Native) Veterans enrolled in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits program are far less likely to access health care compared to other racial/ethnic groups, in part driven by challenges posed by often distant, complex, and culturally unresponsive health care that does not easily interface with the Indian Health Service (IHS) and local Tribal Health Care. To address this disparity, in 2020 the Veteran's Health Administration's (VHA) Office of Rural Health (ORH) initiated the development of a patient navigation program designed specifically for rural Native Veterans. There are no navigation programs for rural Native Veterans to guide development of such a program. Hence, the project team sought perspectives from rural Native Veterans, their families, and community advocates, (n = 34), via video and phone interviews about the role and functions of a Veteran patient navigator and personal characteristics best be suited for such a position. Participants believed a navigator program would be useful in assisting rural Native Veterans to access VHA care. They emphasized the importance of empathy, support, knowledge of local culture, and of Veteran experience within tribal communities, adeptness with VHA systems, and personnel consistency. These insights are critical to create a program capable of increasing rural Native Veteran access to VHA services.

Health Conditions and Health Care Use Among American Indian and Alaska Native Adults by Tribal Land Residential Status: United States, 2019-2021.

Objective-This report presents estimates for selected health conditions and health care use among American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) adults by tribal land residential status.

"Treat Me like Your Family": Positive Factors that Influence Patient-Provider Relationships for Native American Women.

Although extensive documentation of the health disparities experienced by Native American peoples exists, little research explores experiences of members of non-federally recognized tribes who receive health care outside of the Indian Health Services (IHS) system. Additionally, positive factors that influence relationships between health care providers and tribal members are understudied and are needed to promote health care access. A qualitative descriptive methodologic approach was used to conduct semi structured life history interviews with 31 women who identified as members of a state-recognized, Gulf South Native American tribe. Results identified the following important themes: Do Participants Have a Regular Provider, Personal Relationship With Provider, Feel Provider Cares, Provider Addresses Concern, and Respect for Traditional or Holistic Medicine. These findings suggest health care providers play an important role in impacting the health care experiences of Native American tribal members. Implications for trainings for health care providers are discussed.

Best of ARM: Evaluating engagement in multisector community health networks: The case of tribal organizations.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify variation in public health system engagement with tribal organizations across a national sample of communities and to identify predictors of engagement. DATA SOURCES: We used 2018 National Longitudinal Survey of Public Health Systems data, a nationally representative cohort of the US public health systems. STUDY DESIGN: Social network analysis measures were computed to indicate the extent of tribal organization participation in public health networks and to understand the sectors and social services that engage with tribal organizations in public health activities. Two-part regression models estimated predictors of tribal engagement. DATA COLLECTION: A stratified random sample of local public health agencies was surveyed, yielding 574 respondents. An additional cohort of oversampled respondents was also surveyed to include jurisdictions from the entire state upon the request of their respective state health departments (n = 154). Analyses were restricted to jurisdictions with a nearby American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) serving health facility, yielding a final sample size of 258 local public health systems. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: When an AI/AN serving health facility was present in the region, tribal organizations participated in 28% of public health networks and 9% of implemented public health activities. Networks with tribal engagement were more comprehensive in terms of the breadth of sectors and social services participating in the network and the scope of public health activities implemented relative to networks without tribal engagement. The likelihood of tribal engagement increased significantly with the size of the AI/AN population, the presence of a tribal facility with Indian Health Service funding in the region, and geographic proximity to reservation land (p < 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of public health networks do not report engagement with tribal organizations. Even when AI/AN serving health facilities are present, reported engagement of tribal organizations remains low.

American Indian and Alaska Native veterans in the Indian Health Service: Health status, utilization, and cost.

PURPOSE: Many rural American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) veterans receive care from the Indian Health Service (IHS). United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has reimbursement agreements with some IHS facilities and tribal programs and seeks to expand community partnerships in tribal areas, but details of how AIAN veterans use IHS are unknown. We aimed to assess the health status, service utilization patterns, and cost of care of veterans who use IHS. METHODS: We used comprehensive and integrated IHS data to compare health status, health service utilization and treatment cost of veterans (n = 12,242) to a matched sample of non-veterans (n = 12,242). We employed logistic, linear, or negative binomial regressions as appropriate, by sex and overall. FINDINGS: Compared to non-veterans, veterans had lower odds of having hypertension, renal disease, all-cause dementia, and alcohol or drug use disorders, but had similar burden of other conditions. In service utilization, veterans had lower hospital inpatient days; patterns were mixed across outpatient services. Unadjusted treatment costs for veterans and non-veterans were $3,923 and $4,145, respectively; veteran adjusted treatment costs were statistically lower. Differences in significance by sex were found for health conditions and service use. CONCLUSIONS: AIAN veterans, compared to AIAN non-veterans, were not less healthy, nor did they require more intensive or more costly care under IHS. Our results indicate the viability and importance of expanding IHS-VA partnerships in community care.

The costs of treating all-cause dementia among American Indians and Alaska native adults who access services through the Indian Health Service and Tribal health programs.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about treatment costs for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) adults with dementia who access services through the Indian Health Service (IHS) and Tribal health programs. METHODS: We analyzed fiscal year 2013 IHS/Tribal treatment costs for AI/ANs aged 65+ years with dementia and a matched sample without dementia (n = 1842) to report actual and adjusted total treatment costs and costs by service type. Adjusted costs were estimated using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: Mean total treatment cost for adults with dementia were $13,027, $5400 higher than for adults without dementia ($7627). The difference in adjusted total treatment costs was $2943 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $1505, $4381), the majority of which was due to the difference in hospital inpatient costs ($2902; 95% CI: $1512, $4293). DISCUSSION: Knowing treatment costs for AI/ANs with dementia can guide enhancements to policies and services for treating dementia and effectively using health resources.

The Indian Health Service and American Indian/Alaska Native Health Outcomes.

The Indian Health Service (IHS) has made huge strides in narrowing health disparities between American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations and other racial and ethnic groups. Yet, health disparities experienced by AI/AN people persist, with deep historical roots combined with present-day challenges. Here we review the history of the IHS from colonization to the present-day system, highlight persistent disparities in AI/AN health and health care, and discuss six key present-day challenges: inadequate funding, limited human resources, challenges associated with transitioning services from federal to Tribal control through contracting and compacting, evolving federal and state programs, the need for culturally sensitive services, and the promise and challenges of health technology.

Disparities in Care Experienced by American Indian and Alaska Native Medicare Beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the health care experiences of American Indians and Alaska Natives (AIANs) due to limited data. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the health care experiences of AIAN Medicare beneficiaries relative to non-Hispanic Whites using national survey data pooled over 5 years. SUBJECTS: A total of 1,193,248 beneficiaries who responded to the nationally representative 2012-2016 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys. METHODS: Linear regression models predicted CAHPS measures from race and ethnicity. Scores on the CAHPS measures were linearly transformed to a 0-100 range and case-mix adjusted. Three AIAN groups were compared with non-Hispanic Whites: single-race AIANs (n=2491; 0.4% of the total sample), multiple-race AIANs (n=15,502; 1.3%), and Hispanic AIANs (n=2264; 0.2%). RESULTS: Among AIAN groups, single-race AIANs were most likely to live in rural areas and areas served by the Indian Health Service; Hispanic AIANs were most likely to be Spanish-language-preferring (P's<0.05). Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, single-race AIANs reported worse experiences with getting needed care (adjusted disparity of -5 points; a "large" difference), getting care quickly (-4 points; a "medium" difference), doctor communication (-2 points; a "small" difference), care coordination (-2 points), and customer service (-7 points; P<0.001 for all comparisons). Disparities were similar for Hispanic AIANs but more limited for multiple-race AIANs. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement efforts are needed to reduce disparities faced by older AIANs. These findings may assist in developing targeted efforts to address cultural, communication, and health system factors presumed to underlie disparities in health care access and customer service.

The 2019 Partial Government Shutdown and Its Impact on Health Care for American Indians and Alaska Natives.

The 2018-9 partial government shutdown created a 35-day gap in federal appropriations for the Indian Health Service and tribal health programs. With ongoing challenges for American Indian and Alaska Native health systems, including clinician shortages and poor health outcomes, the funding gap engendered substantial health risks. Other federal health systems have been sheltered from this and past shutdowns through receiving their appropriations in advance. Several approaches exist to implementing advance appropriations, including instituting advance appropriations across Bureau of Indian Affairs and Indian Health Service programs; or by moving Indian Health Service funding to the same appropriation as the Department of Health and Human Services. Furthermore, building and strengthening health partnerships with non-federal institutions, such as academic medical centers, may help distribute financial risk and strengthen care systems.

Health care utilisation changes among Alaska Native adults after participation in an indigenous community programme to address adverse life experiences: a propensity score-matched analysis.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether participation in Family Wellness Warriors Initiative (FWWI), an Alaska Native program that addresses adverse life experiences, is associated with changes in health care utilisation. The study method was a propensity score-matched cohort analysis using retrospective electronic health record data from Southcentral Foundation, a tribal health care system, from 2012 to 2017. Ninety p\articipants in FWWI trainings were identified as the intervention cohort and were propensity matched with 90 people who participated in other emotional wellness-related interventions. The primary outcome was the number of total health system visits. Secondary outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, substance-use visits and visits with somatisation potential. After adjustment for covariates, FWWI participants showed a 36% reduction in total system visits (incidence rate ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.84) and a 70% reduction in substance use visits (incidence rate ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.10-0.93) when compared to the control. FWWI participants showed a 40% reduction in ED visits (incidence rate ratio 0.60, 95%CI 0.35-1.02) when compared to the control that was borderline significant. No significant differences were found for visits with somatisation potential (incidence rate ratio 1.25, 95% CI 0.79-1.99).

Hepatitis C drug prescriptions and Medicaid policies--four states, Indian health care system, USA 2018.

Medicaid, the state-level public insurance in the United States, has widely differing criteria treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) such as stage of liver fibrosis, documented sobriety, and specialist consultation. In a rural health network, facilities located in two less restrictive states prescribed HCV drugs at a significantly higher rate than two more restrictive states (rate ratio 4.7, CI 2.6-8.5). Prescription rates per population were highly associated with HCV treatment policies.

A cardiac computed tomography first strategy to evaluate chest pain in a rural setting: outcomes and cost implications.

INTRODUCTION: Chest pain continues to be a major burden on the healthcare system with more than eight million patients being evaluated in the emergency department (ED) setting annually at a cost of greater than 10 billion dollars. Missed chest pain diagnoses for ischemia are the leading cause of malpractice lawsuits for ED physicians. The use of cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to assess acute chest pain was adopted at the Chickasaw Nation Medical Center to attempt to accurately diagnose low to intermediate risk chest pain and potentially reduce the cost of chest pain evaluation to the system while still transferring appropriate high-risk patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients presenting to the ED with low to moderate risk chest pain were evaluated with at least two negative troponin levels, an ECG, and in most instances overnight observation followed by CCTA in the morning if eligible. High-risk patients were transported to a tertiary care facility with cardiac catheterization capabilities. Medical records were checked to determine if any adverse events had occurred during follow-up. Adverse events were defined as myocardial infarction, death, and/or revascularization. Mean follow-up was 28 months. RESULTS: Of the 368 patients studied, 29 patients were transferred due to findings of at least moderate obstructive disease. Of those 29 patients transferred, 11 patients underwent revascularization (10 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and one underwent coronary artery bypass grafting). The average coronary artery calcium score for patients transferred was 96.1. The average coronary artery calcium score for patients undergoing revascularization was 174.6. Six patients had normal coronary arteries on catheterization. The remaining 12 patients had the moderate obstructive disease by catheterization that was not physiologically significant by either invasive fractional flow reserve or in two instances, negative stress perfusion testing. At 24 months, two patients had undergone revascularization and one patient had died suddenly. CONCLUSION: The cost savings associated with a CCTA first strategy to evaluate chest pain were ~$1 200 244.10. For a self-insured health system such as the Chickasaw Nation, these are very important cost savings.

Envisioning health equity for American Indian/Alaska Natives: a unique HIT opportunity.

The Indian Health Service provides care to remote and under-resourced communities in the United States. American Indian/Alaska Native patients have some of the highest morbidity and mortality among any ethnic group in the United States. Starting in the 1980s, the IHS implemented the Resource and Patient Management System health information technology (HIT) platform to improve efficiency and quality to address these disparities. The IHS is currently assessing the Resource and Patient Management System to ensure that changing health information needs are met. HIT assessments have traditionally focused on cost, reimbursement opportunities, infrastructure, required or desired functionality, and the ability to meet provider needs. Little information exists on frameworks that assess HIT legacy systems to determine solutions for an integrated rural healthcare system whose end goal is health equity. This search for a next-generation HIT solution for a historically underserved population presents a unique opportunity to envision and redefine HIT that supports health equity as its core mission.

Outcomes and Lessons Learned from the Tribal Veterans Representative Program: A Model for System Engagement.

American Indian and Alaska Native Veterans are more rural than Veterans of any other race or ethnicity and face significant barriers to accessing care. Since 2001, the Tribal Veterans Representative (TVR) Program, a partnership between the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and tribal nations, has trained liaisons from tribal communities to facilitate access to VA benefits and services. We delineate the TVR program model alongside supporting data. We reviewed TVR training materials and program evaluations to identify components of the program essential for increasing access to VA services and benefits. We then report a quantitative assessment of benefits attained in one tribal community. The TVR model is characterized by the exchange of two sets of knowledge and resources-'institutional' and 'community'-during a co-sponsored educational program aiming to train community liaisons about the institution. The institution leads the program's content; the community's traditions inform its process. Following the program, liaisons use support networks comprising trainers, trainees and local organizations to teach other community members to access health care and benefits. In the evaluation community, one liaison has facilitated access for hundreds of Veterans, with financial compensation exceeding $400,000 annually. The TVR program has begun to demonstrate its utility for other rural populations, though further formal evaluation is recommended. Compared with similar models to increase rural populations' access to health care and benefits, the long-term support networks from the TVR model may be most useful when the institution must build trust and engage with the target population.

Ambiguous Jurisdiction: Governmental Relationships that Affect American Indian Health Care Access.

The United States has an obligation to provide health care to American Indians. Services are generally provided through the Indian Health Service, tribal, or urban Indian health programs. Despite the availability of government-sponsored health services, health care access remains a concern for American Indians.