Impact of radiation on the incidence and management of ureteroenteric strictures: a contemporary single center analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ureteroenteric stricture incidence has been reported as high as 20% after urinary diversion. Many patients have undergone prior radiotherapy for prostate, urothelial, colorectal, or gynecologic malignancy. We sought to evaluate the differences between ureteroenteric stricture occurrence between patients who had radiation prior to urinary diversion and those who did not. METHODS: An IRB-approved cystectomy database was utilized to identify ureteroenteric strictures among 215 patients who underwent urinary diversion at a single academic center between 2016 and 2020. Chart abstraction was conducted to determine the presence of confirmed stricture in these patients, defined as endoscopic diagnosis or definitive imaging findings. Strictures due to malignant ureteral recurrence were excluded (3 patients). Statistical analysis was performed using chi squared test, t-test, and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis of stricture by cancer type. RESULTS: 65 patients had radiation prior to urinary diversion; 150 patients did not have a history of radiation therapy. Benign ureteroenteric stricture rate was 5.3% (8/150) in the non-radiated cohort and 23% (15/65) in the radiated cohort (p = < 0.001). Initial management of stricture was percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) in 78% (18/23) and the remaining 22% (5/23) were managed with primary retrograde ureteral stent placement. Long term management included ureteral reimplantation in 30.4% (7/23). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a significant increase in rate of ureteroenteric strictures in radiated patients as compared to non-radiated patients. The insult of radiation on the ureteral microvascular supply is likely implicated in the cause of these strictures. Further study is needed to optimize surgical approach such as utilization of fluorescence angiography for open and robotic approaches.

Validating a claims-based method for assessing severe rectal and urinary adverse effects of radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To validate a claims-based algorithm for detecting severe rectal and urinary adverse effects (AEs) of radiotherapy (RT) to inform the design and interpretation of outcomes studies, using administrative datasets to detect such RT AEs. METHODS: An institutional billing analysis was performed to identify patients managed with RT for prostate or cervical cancer at the University of Minnesota, between 2000 and 2006. A priori, we identified Current Procedural Terminology procedural codes consistent with treatment for severe RT AEs. A retrospective chart review and a billing (ie "claims") analysis were performed to detect the procedures used to treat RT AEs. The accuracy of the claims-based algorithm was compared with chart review (the reference standard). RESULTS: On chart review, 31 patients (7.6%) with severe rectal and urinary RT AEs were detected among 406 patients with nonmetastatic cancer at diagnosis. The most common AE was ureteral stenosis (25% of all AEs). The sensitivity and specificity of the claims-based analysis were 75% and 100% respectively for urethral stricture, 100% and 99% respectively for ureteral stricture, 60% and 100% respectively for radiation cystitis, 88% and 100% respectively for rectal or urinary fistula, and 88% and 100% respectively for radiation proctitis. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated an excellent specificity and yet fairly good sensitivity of our claims-based algorithm for detecting treatment of urethral stricture, rectal or urinary fistulas, radiation proctitis, and ureteral stricture. These data might inform the design and interpretation of studies using claims-based methods for the detection of severe urinary AEs of pelvic RT.

[Prospective study of the treatment of localised ureteric strictures by wire mesh stent]. / Etude prospective de traitement des sténoses urétérales localisées par endoprothèse grillagée métallique.

AIMS: To assess efficacy of Mémotherm BARD ureteral metallic stent in the treatment of non-operable ureteral stenoses. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective evaluation of ureteral stenoses consecutively treated using Mémotherm BARD ureteral metallic stent. Assessment criteria (recurrence frequency, permeability, tolerance, complications) were measured by clinical examination, Intra Veinous Pyelography, renal sonography, urine culture at 1, and every 3 months. RESULTS: Thirteen stents were inserted in 12 patients (mean age: 68 yrs) presenting with subsequent ureteral stenosis (9 neoplastic, 3 following radiotherapy) over a 3 year period. No technical difficulty was observed. Mean follow-up was 19 months. Stenosis recurrence was observed in 5 patients, due to tumoural progression, but with no tumour in-growth. There was non incrustation or migration, pain, hematuria, infection due to the stent. All stent remained permeable and functional in surviving patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, Mémotherm BARD ureteral metallic stent could be considered a useful cost-effective alternative to double J stent or traditional surgery in non-operable or end-of-life patients. The high ureteral stenosis recurrence rate was linked to the patient initial pathology. Considering these encouraging results, this study could represent the first stage of a multicenter tracker-study, which would permit to take into account further technological development of this type of material.