Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients with multiple sclerosis and overactive bladder: a real-life clinical and urodynamic assessment.

AIMS: The aims of the present study were to assess the effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) on overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and on urodynamic parameters in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and to seek predictive factors of satisfaction. METHODS: All PwMS who performed 12-24 weeks of TTNS and who underwent urodynamic assessment before and after treatment between June 2020 and October 2022 were included retrospectively. Data collected were bladder diaries, symptoms assessed with Urinary Symptoms Profile (USP), and urodynamic parameters (bladder sensations, detrusor overactivity, and voiding phase). Patients with improvement rated as very good or good on Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score were considered as responders. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (mean age: 47.1 ± 11.5 years, 67 (82%) were women). The mean USP OAB sub-score decreased from 7.7 ± 3.5 to 6.0 ± 3.4 (p < 0.0001). On bladder diaries, voided volumes, void frequency, and the proportion of micturition done at urgent need to void significantly improved with TTNS (p < 0.05). No significant change was found in urodynamic parameters. According to the PGI-I, 34 (42.5%) patients were good responders. The only parameter associated with higher satisfaction was the percentage of micturition done at urgent need to void before the initiation of the treatment (39.8% ± 30.5 in the responder group vs 25.1% ± 25.6 in the low/no responder group; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: TTNS improves OAB symptoms in PwMS, without significant changes on urodynamics. A high rate of strong or urgent need to void in daily life was associated with higher satisfaction.

The assessment and management of voiding dysfunction in adults living with cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE: Improvements in life expectancy have resulted in an increasing number of adults with cerebral palsy, of which over a third will have neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). This review explores urinary dysfunction in adults with cerebral palsy. METHODS: Relevant literature on NLUTD in adults with cerebral palsy was identified using an unrestricted search of PubMed. RESULTS: Urinary incontinence is the most common complaint, often accompanied by frequency and urgency. Special consideration should be given to women and in those with worse motor or cognitive dysfunction as they have been shown to have more severe urologic symptoms. NLUTD can have significant morbidity and impact quality of life. Hospital admission, urinary tract infections, and hydronephrosis are common urologic complications, with poor urinary function associated with decreased quality of life (QOL). Neurogenic detrusor overactivity is the most common urodynamic abnormality, with elevated detrusor leak point pressure and reduced bladder capacity. Detrusor sphincter dyssynergy is present in some patients and maybe secondary to generalized spasticity or incomplete upper motor neuron injury. Elevated bladder capacity is also present in a portion of patients, and becomes particularly relevant in adults as a result of increased spasticity of the urinary sphincter. Conservative management like functional toileting strategies, medications, and incontinence aids are successful in most patients. Medical management with anticholinergics is well described, and frequently the only intervention required, particularly in children. Intermittent clean catheterization has mixed results with this population, as its efficacy is limited by pelvic spasticity and patient factors. Surgical intervention, while often successful, should be restricted to select patients, as it is associated with significant morbidity in this population. CONCLUSION: Management of NLUTD in adults with CP involves conservative management, medications, and in rare cases surgical intervention.

Urodynamics tests for the diagnosis and management of bladder outlet obstruction in men: the UPSTREAM non-inferiority RCT.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men may indicate bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) or weakness, known as detrusor underactivity (DU). Severe bothersome LUTS are a common indication for surgery. The diagnostic tests may include urodynamics (UDS) to confirm whether BOO or DU is the cause, potentially reducing the number of people receiving (inappropriate) surgery. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine whether a care pathway including UDS is no worse for symptom outcome than one in which it is omitted, at 18 months after randomisation. Rates of surgery was the key secondary outcome. DESIGN: This was a pragmatic, multicentre, two-arm (unblinded) randomised controlled trial, incorporating a health economic analysis and qualitative research. SETTING: Urology departments of 26 NHS hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: Men (aged ≥ 18 years) seeking further treatment, potentially including surgery, for bothersome LUTS. Exclusion criteria were as follows: unable to pass urine without a catheter, having a relevant neurological disease, currently undergoing treatment for prostate or bladder cancer, previously had prostate surgery, not medically fit for surgery and/or unwilling to be randomised. INTERVENTIONS: Men were randomised to a care pathway based on non-invasive routine tests (control) or routine care plus invasive UDS (intervention arm). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 18 months after randomisation and the key secondary outcome was rates of surgery. Additional secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), quality of life, urinary and sexual symptoms, UDS satisfaction, maximum urinary flow rate and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 820 men were randomised (UDS, 427; routine care, 393). Sixty-seven men withdrew before 18 months and 11 died (unrelated to trial procedures). UDS was non-inferior to routine care for IPSS 18 months after randomisation, with a confidence interval (CI) within the margin of 1 point (-0.33, 95% CI -1.47 to 0.80). A lower surgery rate in the UDS arm was not found (38% and 36% for UDS and routine care, respectively), with overall rates lower than expected. AEs were similar between the arms at 43-44%. There were more cases of acute urinary retention in the routine care arm. Patient-reported outcomes for LUTS improved in both arms and satisfaction with UDS was high in men who received it. UDS was more expensive than routine care. From a secondary care perspective, UDS cost an additional £216 over an 18-month time horizon. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were similar, with a QALY difference of 0.006 in favour of UDS over 18 months. It was established that UDS was acceptable to patients, and valued by both patients and clinicians for its perceived additional insight into the cause and probable best treatment of LUTS. LIMITATIONS: The trial met its predefined recruitment target, but surgery rates were lower than anticipated. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of UDS in the diagnostic tests results in a symptom outcome that is non-inferior to a routine care pathway, but does not affect surgical rates for treating BOO. Results do not support the routine use of UDS in men undergoing investigation of LUTS. FUTURE WORK: Focus should be placed on indications for selective utilisation of UDS in individual cases and long-term outcomes of diagnosis and therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN56164274. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 42. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

After hospital referral, men with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are assessed with standard tests. These include measurement of urine flow rate, bladder diaries and questionnaires, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). UPSTREAM (Urodynamics for Prostate Surgery Trial; Randomised Evaluation of Assessment Methods) researched whether or not including an extra test, urodynamics (UDS), helps when considering treatment options. UDS is a more invasive test and measures pressure in the bladder to check whether or not the prostate is causing obstruction. It was presumed that, if there is no obstruction, surgery would not be offered, so that using UDS would reduce the number of prostate operations. Each man participating (820 in total) was assessed with the standard tests. Around half of them had no extra tests (the 'routine care' arm of the trial); the rest had the UDS tests (the 'UDS' arm). Men then went on to have treatment, which they chose having discussed their test results with a urologist. IPSS and other symptom scores were examined for each man 18 months after joining the trial. At 18 months, surgery outcomes were known for 792 men and IPSS was known for 669 men. We investigated if the two trial arms showed similar changes in the IPSS and if there were fewer operations done in the UDS arm. We identified similar reductions in the IPSS in both arms. However, UDS tests did not reduce the number of operations. Analysing all the costs, it was found that a pathway including UDS costs more than routine care. Interviews were conducted that showed that men found UDS acceptable, and that the additional information helped both the men and their doctors consider which treatment would be most appropriate. These results do not support the routine use of UDS in the assessment of every man considering prostate surgery for LUTS. Further exploration of the data may identify circumstances in which UDS could be helpful.

Italian electronic personal assessment questionnaire-pelvic floor (I.ePAQ-PF): Psychometric validation of the urinary section.

AIM: Tools for remote clinical assessment have become increasingly important. Patient-reported outcome questionnaires are increasingly being considered as the keystones of pelvic floor disorder assessment. An innovative English language multidisciplinary electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire (ePAQ-PF) was psychometrically validated in 2006. A certified Italian version (I.ePAQ-PF) has been recently made available by the Italian Society of Urodynamics. In this study, we aimed to test the psychometric properties to validate the urinary dimension of the I.ePAQ-PF. METHODS: Women complaining of lower urinary tract symptoms were enrolled. After providing informed consent, women filled in the I.ePAQ-PF via a dedicated touch-screen display (T0), together with concurrent questionnaires: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short form, Urgency Severity Scale, Urogenital Distress Inventory, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement. Cronbach's α and Spearman's correlation coefficients were adopted (validity). A test-retest was performed in 47 cases (reliability), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was analyzed. I.ePAQ-PF was also administered after treatment (T1) and compared with baseline data via a Wilcoxon's test and Cohen's effect-size tests (responsiveness). RESULTS: Ninety-three women were included. Internal consistency was confirmed (Cronbach's α >.7). A Spearman's correlation test showed a good correlation (>0.6) between I.ePAQ-PF and conceptually similar questionnaires. I.ePAQ-PF seems to be highly reproducible in all domains (ICC >0.86). The questionnaire scored significantly differently (Wilcoxon test P < .003) in all domains after the treatment. Responsiveness was further confirmed by Cohen's effect size of more than 30%. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian ePAQ-PF (urinary domain) fully satisfies the psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and responsiveness and is ready for clinical application in Italian clinical settings.

Urodynamic Assessment of Neuronal Intranuclear Inclusion Disease.

Neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease (NIID) is a disease that causes leukoencephalopathy (dementia) and peripheral neuropathy (variable manifestation including bladder dysfunction). This is the first urodynamic report to show that bladder dysfunction in NIID is a combination of detrusor overactivity, decreased bladder sensation, large post-void residual, and neurogenic changes in the sphincter electromyogram. This report will help managing bladder dysfunction in NIID.

Ejaculatory Hood Sparing versus Standard Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: Sexual and Urodynamic Assessment through a Double Blinded, Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: In a preliminary clinical trial we assessed the efficacy of ejaculatory hood sparing GreenLight™ Laser prostate photoselective vaporization to preserve antegrade ejaculation and urodynamic relief of obstruction compared to standard GreenLight prostate photoselective vaporization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard prostate photoselective vaporization was classically performed in 24 patients. Ejaculatory hood sparing vaporization was performed with preservation of the paracollicular and supracollicular tissue proximal to the verumontanum in 25 patients. Patients were assessed at baseline, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively using the Ej-MSHQ (Ejaculatory Domain of Male Sexual Health Questionnaire) and the IIEF-15 (International Index of Erectile Function-15). The I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score), uroflowmetry and post-void residual urine volume were reported at each followup visit. A standard urodynamic study was performed at 6 months. RESULTS: Antegrade ejaculation was reported in 85% and 31.6% of patients after hood sparing and standard prostate vaporization, respectively (p=0.001). A significant reduction in the EJ-MSHQ score was reported after standard vaporization at 6 and 12 months (each p <0.001) with no significant difference after hood sparing vaporization (p=0.18 and 0.078, respectively). The median EJ-MSHQ score was 28.5 (range 1 to 33) and 27 (range 1 to 33) for hood sparing vaporization, and 9.5 (range 1 to 35) and 9 (range 0 to 33) for standard vaporization at 6 (p=0.005) and 12 months (p <0.001), respectively. Each group showed a decline in the mean total IIEF-15 score at 1 year but it was statistically significant only after standard vaporization (p=0.001). All urinary outcome measures revealed comparable significant improvement at all followups. Postoperative urodynamic assessment demonstrated a significant comparable decrease in the Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index from a median of 64 (range 21 to 207) to 23.5 (range 10 to 53) after hood sparing vaporization (p=0.005) and from 87 (range 38 to 186) to 19.5 (range 7 to 51) after standard vaporization (p=0.001). At 1 year the overall re-treatment rate was comparable in the 2 groups (p=0.26). CONCLUSIONS: In well informed, sexually interested patients ejaculatory hood sparing GreenLight prostate photoselective vaporization is feasible and effective treatment of small to moderate sized benign prostatic hyperplasia with a superior sexual function related outcome. Short-term relief of obstruction is objectively comparable to that of standard prostate photoselective vaporization.

Clinical and Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Men Referred for Consideration of Surgery to Treat Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Baseline Results and Diagnostic Findings of the Urodynamics for Prostate Surgery Trial; Randomised Evaluation of Assessment Methods (UPSTREAM).

BACKGROUND: Clinical evaluation of male lower urinary tract symptoms (MLUTS) in secondary care uses a range of assessments. It is unknown how MLUTS evaluation influences outcome of therapy recommendations and choice, notably urodynamics (UDS; filling cystometry and pressure flow studies). OBJECTIVE: To report participants' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and initial diagnostic findings of the Urodynamics for Prostate Surgery Trial; Randomised Evaluation of Assessment Methods (UPSTREAM). UPSTREAM is a randomised controlled trial evaluating whether symptoms are noninferior and surgery rates are lower if UDS is included. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 820 men (≥18 yr of age) seeking treatment for bothersome LUTS were recruited from 26 National Health Service hospital urology departments. INTERVENTION: Care pathway based on routine, noninvasive tests (control) or routine care plus UDS (intervention arm). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome is International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the key secondary outcome is surgery rates 18 mo after randomisation. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires were captured for MLUTS, sexual function, and UDS satisfaction. Baseline clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and UDS findings were informally compared between arms. Trends across age groups for urinary and sexual PROMs were evaluated with a Cuzick's test, and questionnaire items were compared using Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Storage LUTS, notably nocturia, and impaired sexual function are prominent in men being assessed for surgery. Sociodemographic and clinical evaluations were similar between arms. Overall mean IPSS and quality of life scores were 18.94 and 4.13, respectively. Trends were found across age groups, with older men suffering from higher rates of incontinence, nocturia, and erectile dysfunction, and younger men suffering from increased daytime frequency and voiding symptoms. Men undergoing UDS testing expressed high satisfaction with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Men being considered for surgery have additional clinical features that may affect treatment decision making and outcomes, notably storage LUTS and impaired sexual function. PATIENT SUMMARY: We describe initial assessment findings from a large clinical study of the treatment pathway for men suffering with bothersome urinary symptoms who were referred to hospital for further treatment, potentially including surgery. We report the patient characteristics and diagnostic test results, including symptom questionnaires, bladder diaries, flow rate tests, and urodynamics.

Need for urodynamic evaluation as a regular follow-up tool in assessment of long-term urological outcomes in patients with sacrococcygeal teratoma.

AIM: To assess the long-term urologic outcomes in follow-up of patients of sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) using urodynamic study (UDS) in addition to clinical and radiologic evaluation. METHODS: A prospective study of clinical, radiological and urodynamic evaluation in patients with SCT who underwent resection between January 2002-June 2015 and were followed up till January 2016 was conducted. RESULTS: Total 57 patients, 42 (73.7%) females and 15 (26.3%) males with 35 (62.4%) following treatment for benign and 22 (38.5%) for malignant disease were included. Twenty-eight of 57 (49.12%) had urological problems. Clinical complaints in 21 (36.8%) patients included stress urinary incontinence-14 (66.7%), enuresis-9 (42.9%), and poor stream or dribbling of urine-6 (28.6%). Eight of 51 patients (15.7%) had abnormal ultrasound findings, which included contracted, trabeculated thick walled bladder (3), bilateral hydronephrosis (3) and significant post void residue (PVR) (6). Seven of 57 underwent micturating cystourethrogram (MCU), 5 had an abnormal report[significant PVR (4), small trabeculated bladder (3), reflux (2) and large capacity bladder (1)]. Urodynamic study was done in 27 patients, 18/27 (66.7%) had abnormalities. Six patients without any clinical or ultrasonographic abnormalities had abnormal UDS. Total 28 (49.12%) had urological comorbidities. Three patients had overactive bladder, five dysfunctional voiding, one underactive bladder and one had giggle incontinence. Children were managed by behaviour therapy and pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSION: Urodynamic evaluation could detect abnormalities in patients who had no urinary complaints or abnormality on ultrasound. The abnormalities have a potential for progressive upper tract damage. Urodynamics should be an integral part of urological surveillance in patients operated for SCT. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognostic study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II (Prospective cohort study).

How accurate are we in urethral mobility assessment? Comparison of subjective and objective assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The knowledge of the mobility of urethra plays important role in patients with stress urinary incontinence and its assessment is a part of standard urogynecological examination. It has been assumed that increased mobility is associated with higher likelihood of successful treatment. There is arbitrary defined cut-off for hypermobile urethra - descend of more than 15 mm or 30-degree resp. 50-degree rotation or more during Valsalva manoeuvre. Clinically we routinely categorize mobility of the urethra as high mobile or hypermobile urethras, low mobile urethra and the situation in-between as mobile urethras. But how accurate are we with such a subjective assessment? We have provided retrospective analysis of mobility of the urethra assessed during the clinical examination by transperineal ultrasound (US) with subjective scoring of the mobility (low, norm, hyper) and compared this assessment with detailed measurement of descent and rotation of the urethra. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Ob/Gyn department First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of urethral mobility of women diagnosed with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) and treated with tension free vaginal slings during the period 01/2009 - 10/2016. For each patient, there was available description of mobility at the time of preoperative assessment (low-, norm- or hyper-mobile) and we compared this assessment with measured parameters of bladder neck mobility analysed later from stored 4D US volumes. We have measured dorsocaudal movement of the bladder neck (BN) (H-distance). This is the distance of the BN from the horizontal line at the level of lower margin of the symphysis and we compared the position at rest and at Valsalva. Secondly, we measured rotation of the urethra using the gama angle - angle between the line connecting BN to lower margin of symphysis and axis of symphysis at rest and during the Valsalva manoeuvre. Mobility of the BN is the difference between the rest and Valsalva position. We compared the objective parameters of mobility with subjective assessment. We have provided correlation of both objective parameters. RESULTS: 427 patients were treated during the analysed period, 393 had available stored 4D US volume for analysis. Mean age 56.5 years (min 29, max 87, SD 7.9), mean BMI 27.4 (min 18.3, max 39.6, SD 7.9), mean parity 2.14. Mean descent of the bladder neck was 11.8 mm (min -1, max 37; SD 6.9) Mean rotation of the bladder neck was 38.8 degree (min -5, max 118, SD 20.0). When we subjectively assessed the mobility as low the mean mobility was 23.9 ° resp. 7.3 mm, for normal 34.8 ° resp. 10.4 mm and 48.6 ° resp. 15 mm for hypermobile uretras. We have found good correlation of both parameters - H-distance, gama angle - r = 0.693. CONCLUSION: Subjective assessment of mobility of the urethra seems to be reasonably accurate for distinguishing between low and hypermobile uretra.

ICS Educational Module: Electromyography in the assessment and therapy of lower urinary tract dysfunction in adults.

AIM: To present the teaching module "Electromyography in the assessment and therapy of lower urinary tract dysfunction in adults." This teaching module embodies a presentation, in combination with this manuscript. This manuscript serves as a scientific background review; the evidence base made available on ICS website to summarize current knowledge and recommendations. METHODS: This review has been prepared by a Working Group of The ICS Urodynamics Committee. The methodology used included comprehensive literature review, consensus formation by the members of the Working Group, and review by members of the ICS Urodynamics Committee core panel. RESULTS: Electromyography (EMG) is a method to record spontaneous or artificially induced electrical activity of the nerve-muscle unit or to test nerve conductivity. EMG of the anal sphincter using surface electrode is most widely used screening technique to detect detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia in urology. It is non-invasive and easy to perform. EMG methods using needle electrodes are reserved for diagnostics in well selected group of mainly neurogenic patients. These methods require expertise in the field of general EMG and are usually performed by neurologist and neuro-physiologist. The evidence in many aspects of use of EMG in urology remains sparse. CONCLUSIONS: Currently EMG methods rarely play a decision making role in selecting proper treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. With the current efforts to improve phenotyping of these patients in order to provide individualized treatment, the role of EMG could increase.

A commentary on expectations of healthcare professionals when applying the international continence society standards to basic assessment of lower urinary tract function.

The International Continence Society (ICS) has sustained a drive to improve the clinical assessment of lower urinary tract function for many years. Increasingly, healthcare professionals (HCPs) engage with the guidance, and patients benefit from the precision that results when their carers apply a sensible and logical approach to assessment. The current supplementary issue of Neurourology and Urodynamics (NAU) summarizes the fundamentals derived from major ICS initiatives, emphasizing what HCPs must know when dealing with these patients, regardless of the medical discipline in which they work. It also introduces the basics of urodynamics testing to trainees and HCPs who may refer patients for testing. In this editorial review we draw out some additional points of consideration. We emphasize the need to avoid using terms in a clinical context that could imply causative mechanism, until the mechanism has actually been identified. We caution against the use of severity thresholds, until there is proper data to justify their application for any given patient group. Finally, we provide a description of the philosophical basis of urodynamics testing, including videourodynamics. This commentary should be read in the context of the other articles provided in the NAU supplement.

Male Incontinence: The Etiology or Basis of Treatment.

CONTEXT: Elderly men are an increasing proportion of the aging population in the 21st century. Urinary incontinence reduces the quality of life and increases the burden of care for the aging population. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this review is to explore the etiopathology of common causes of incontinence in aging male patients. The focus is on the algorithm of the initial evaluation of these patients from both a primary care and a urologic standpoint. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A nonsystematic review of the literature was performed in September 2017. The data and evidence of this paper have been obtained by a PubMed search, and through official statements and recommendations from the International Consultation on Incontinence. Our search incorporated terms such as elderly, urinary incontinence, male, urodynamics, bladder outlet obstruction, BPH, neurologic, urethral stricture, spinal shock, and urethral sphincter injury. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 7204 papers were identified; 6838 were excluded for female populations and populations <65 yr. A broad differential diagnosis exists for urinary incontinence in aging male patients, and many patients will be found to have multifactorial incontinence, compounding the issue. Neurologic etiologies common in this population include cerebrovascular accidents, Parkinson's disease, and dementia. Spinal cord injuries and multiple sclerosis are less common. In this analysis, non-neurologic etiologies leading to incontinence are broadly grouped under bladder outlet obstruction, sphincter injury, overactive bladder, underactive bladder, polypharmacy, and urinary tract infections. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a review of the differential diagnosis of incontinence in an elderly male patient. There is a need for understanding etiopathology and recognizing that many patients may have a combination of the above. The assessment algorithm, modified from the International Continence Society, provides a pathway for the provider in evaluating and treating elderly patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this review, we have identified the sources of urinary incontinence in elderly male patients by neurologic and non-neurologic causes. We also discuss the basic evaluation and workup of an incontinent patient.

Sensory function assessment of the human male lower urinary tract using current perception thresholds.

AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of current perception threshold (CPT) measurement for sensory assessment of distinct locations in the male lower urinary tract (LUT). METHODS: Twelve male subjects (>18 years) without LUT symptoms or medical comorbidities were eligible. CPTs were determined twice (interval: 7-20 days) at the bladder dome, trigone and the proximal, membranous, and distal urethra. Square wave electrical stimulation of 3 Hz/0.2 ms and 0.5 Hz/1 ms was applied using a transurethral 8F catheter placed under fluoroscopic control. Bladder volume was kept constant (60 mL) using a second 10F catheter. Repetitive measurements and reliability were assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The ANOVA revealed significant main effects for stimulation site (P = 0.008) and type of stimulation (P < 0.001) with lower CPTs for 0.5 Hz/1 ms compared to 3 Hz/0.2 ms. There was no significant effect for visit number (P = 0.061). CPTs were higher for bladder dome than for proximal (0.5 Hz/1 ms: P = 0.022; 3 Hz/0.2 ms: P = 0.022) and distal urethra (0.5 Hz/1 ms: P = 0.026; 3 Hz/0.2 ms: P = 0.030). Reliability of CPT measurements was excellent to good (ICC = 0.67-0.96) except for the bladder dome (5 Hz/1 ms: ICC = 0.45; 3 Hz/0.2 ms: ICC = 0.20) and distal urethra (3 Hz/0.2 ms: ICC = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: CPTs can be reliably detected at different LUT locations. However, alert and compliant subjects are essential. CPTs of LUT may become a complementary assessment method providing information on responsiveness and sensitivity of afferent LUT nerves. This is especially relevant for urethral afferents, which are not covered by standard urodynamic investigations. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:469-473, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Trends in surgical management and pre-operative urodynamics in female medicare beneficiaries with mixed incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the surgical trends and utilization of treatment for mixed urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Data was obtained from a 5% national random sample of outpatient and carrier claims from 2000 to 2011. Included were female patients 65 and older, diagnosed with mixed urinary incontinence, who underwent surgical treatment identified by Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition (CPT-4) codes. Urodynamics (UDS) before initial and secondary procedure were also identified using CPT-4 codes. Procedural trends and utilization of UDS were analyzed. RESULTS: Utilization of UDS increased during the study period, from 38.4% to 74.0% prior to initial surgical intervention, and from 28.6% to 62.5% preceding re-intervention. Sling surgery (63.0%) and injectable bulking agents (28.0%) were the most common surgical treatments adopted, followed by sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) (4.8%) and Burch (4.0%) procedures. Re-intervention was performed in 4.0% of patients initially treated with sling procedures and 21.3% of patients treated with bulking agents, the majority of whom (51.7% and 76.3%, respectively) underwent injection of a bulking agent. Risk of re-intervention was not different among those who did or did not receive urodynamic tests prior to the initial procedure (8.5% vs. 9.3%) CONCLUSIONS: Sling and bulk agents are the most common treatment for MUI. Preoperative urodynamic testing was not related to risk of re-intervention following surgery for mixed urinary incontinence in this cohort. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:422-425, 2017. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Testing and Treating Women after Unsuccessful Conservative Treatments for Overactive Bladder or Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Model-Based Economic Evaluation Based on the BUS Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of bladder ultrasonography, clinical history, and urodynamic testing in guiding treatment decisions in a secondary care setting for women failing first line conservative treatment for overactive bladder or urgency-predominant mixed urinary incontinence. DESIGN: Model-based economic evaluation from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective using data from the Bladder Ultrasound Study (BUS) and secondary sources. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree and a 5-year time horizon based on the outcomes of cost per woman successfully treated and cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year (QALY). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and a value of information analysis are also undertaken. RESULTS: Bladder ultrasonography is more costly and less effective test-treat strategy than clinical history and urodynamics. Treatment on the basis of clinical history alone has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £491,100 per woman successfully treated and an ICER of £60,200 per QALY compared with the treatment of all women on the basis of urodynamics. Restricting the use of urodynamics to women with a clinical history of mixed urinary incontinence only is the optimal test-treat strategy on cost-effectiveness grounds with ICERs of £19,500 per woman successfully treated and £12,700 per QALY compared with the treatment of all women based upon urodynamics. Conclusions remained robust to sensitivity analyses, but subject to large uncertainties. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment based upon urodynamics can be seen as a cost-effective strategy, and particularly when targeted at women with clinical history of mixed urinary incontinence only. Further research is needed to resolve current decision uncertainty.

Short and long-term urodynamic and quality of life assessment after nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: a prospective pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare pre- and postoperative bladder function and quality of life (QoL) in women diagnosed with gynecologic malignancy and treated with nerve sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH). STUDY DESIGN: Before and after NSRH for uterine malignancy, bladder function was prospectively assessed in a small cohort of 12 women (39-72 years) suffering from uterine malignancy using urodynamic studies and a validated self-administered condition specific QoL questionnaire. Urodynamic studies were performed one day before (U0) as well as one week (U1) and 22 months (U2) after surgery. The questionnaire was applied at U0 and U2. RESULTS: Cystometry showed detrusor contractions leading to overactive bladder incontinence in six out of nine women at short-term, which persisted in three women at long-term follow-up leading to a significant impaired QoL. Voiding function and bladder sensation remained uncompromised after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: NSRH preserves voiding function and bladder sensation. However, short and long-term urodynamic detrusor overactivity and urge incontinence was observed in a significant number of women although symptoms improved over time. These data are important for counselling women and for the design of larger studies to assess the benefits of NSRH versus conventional radical hysterectomy (RH).

Bladder ultrasonography for diagnosing detrusor overactivity: test accuracy study and economic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Urodynamics (UDS) has been considered the gold standard test for detrusor overactivity (DO) in women with an overactive bladder (OAB). Bladder ultrasonography to measure bladder wall thickness (BWT) is less invasive and has been proposed as an alternative test. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the reliability, reproducibility, accuracy and acceptability of BWT in women with OAB, measured by ultrasonography, in the diagnosis of DO; to explore the role of UDS and its impact on treatment outcomes; and to conduct an economic evaluation of alternative care pathways. DESIGN: A cross-sectional test accuracy study. SETTING: 22 UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 687 women with OAB. METHODS: BWT was measured using transvaginal ultrasonography, and DO was assessed using UDS, which was performed blind to ultrasonographic findings. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were assessed by repeated measurements from scans in 37 and 57 women, respectively, and by repeated scans in 27 women. Sensitivity and specificity were computed at pre-specified thresholds. The smallest real differences detectable of BWT were estimated using one-way analysis of variance. The pain and acceptability of both tests were evaluated by a questionnaire. Patient symptoms were measured before testing and after 6 and 12 months using the International Consultation on Incontinence modular Questionnaire Overactive Bladder (short form) (ICIQ-OAB) questionnaire and a global impression of improvement elicited at 12 months. Interventions and patient outcomes were analysed according to urodynamic diagnoses and BWT measurements. A decision-analytic model compared the cost-effectiveness of care strategies using UDS, ultrasonography or clinical history, estimating the cost per woman successfully treated and the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS: BWT showed very low sensitivity and specificity at all pre-specified cut-off points, and there was no evidence of discrimination at any threshold (p = 0.25). Extensive sensitivity and subgroup analyses did not alter the interpretation of these findings. The smallest detectable difference in BWT was estimated to be 2 mm. Pain levels following both tests appeared relatively low. The proportion of women who found the test 'totally acceptable' was significantly higher with ultrasonography than UDS (81% vs. 56%; p < 0.001). Overall, subsequent treatment was highly associated with urodynamic diagnosis (p < 0.0001). There was no evidence that BWT had any relationship with the global impression of improvement responses at 20 months (p = 0.4). Bladder ultrasonography was more costly and less effective than the other strategies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of basing treatment on the primary clinical presentation compared with UDS was £491,500 per woman successfully treated and £60,200 per QALY. Performing a UDS in those women with a clinical history of mixed urinary incontinence had an ICER of £19,500 per woman successfully treated and £12,700 per QALY compared with the provision of urodynamic to all women. For DO cases detected, UDS was the most cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence that BWT had any relationship with DO, regardless of the cut-off point, nor any relationship to symptoms as measured by the ICIQ-OAB. Bladder ultrasonography has no diagnostic or prognostic value as a test in this condition. Furthermore, despite its greater acceptability, BWT measurement was not sufficiently reliable or reproducible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN46820623. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 7. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

The role of urinary nerve growth factor for the diagnosis and assessment of the biofeedback success in children with dysfunctional voiding.

INTRODUCTION: Dysfunctional voiding (DV) occurs in neurologically normal children who are not able to establish brain control on detrusor muscle contractions (DMCs). It is also reported to be the result of incorrect voiding habits during toilet training. Children contract pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) to suppress DMC and DV begins. Urinary nerve growth factor (uNGF) is necessary for the synthesis and regulation of neurotransmitters, development of dorsal root ganglia (sensory neurons), and development of sympathetic cells during embryonic and post-natal life. uNGF has also a role in the intracellular signal transduction in nerve cells towards the target organ. To our knowledge, no study has investigated the association between uNGF, biofeedback treatment and DV in children. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to examine the potential effect of uNGF in the assessment of the effectiveness of biofeedback success in children with lower urinary tract disorders. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-two children with the suspicion of DV and 48 children from a primary school reporting no urinary complaints were enrolled in this study from October 2010 to April 2013 in the Urology Department. uNGF levels were compared. RESULTS: The mean uNGF/creatinine (Cr) level was 0.23 ± 0.26 in the control group and 0.96 ± 0.88 in the DV group (p < 0.001). The mean uNGF/Cr levels in the DV group at baseline and at the end of biofeedback therapy at 6 and 12 months were 0.90 ± 0.78, 0.26 ± 0.32, and 0.40 ± 0.50, respectively (p < 0.001) (Figure). DISCUSSION: To our knowledge this study is the first to show the correlations between uNGF levels and biofeedback therapy in children with DV. Tissue NGF in 12 patients with overactive bladder (OAB)/detrusor overactivity and 15 healthy women was previously compared and it was suggested that there was no correlation between bladder tissue NGF and OAB. uNGF levels in the bladder in patients with interstitial cystitis and idiopathic sensorial urgency were evaluated previously, and uNGF levels reported. Similar to these reports, most of the previous studies handled uNGF in patients with diseases such as interstitial cystitis, OAB, urinary tract infections, urolithiasis, spinal cord injury, and prostate cancer, and found significantly higher uNGF levels. These studies were generally in adults. A previous study about uNGF comprised 40 children with OAB, in contrast to other studies. According to this study, 40 children diagnosed with OAB were administered anti-muscarinic therapy (oxybutynin 0.3-0.5 mg/kg/day). It was reported that uNGF/Cr levels of the OAB group were higher than control group. In the current study, we evaluated the uNGF difference in DV and the effect of biofeedback treatment on uNGF levels. CONCLUSIONS: uNGF levels were higher in children with DV and decreased after biofeedback therapy. uNGF levels could be used for the diagnosis and the assessment of biofeedback success in these children.

The cost of preoperative urodynamics: A secondary analysis of the ValUE trial.

AIMS: Urodynamic studies (UDS) are generally recommended prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), despite insufficient evidence that it impacts treatment plans or outcomes in patients with uncomplicated SUI. This analysis aimed to calculate the cost incurred when UDS was performed as a supplement to a basic office evaluation and to extrapolate the potential savings of not doing UDS in this patient population on a national basis. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis from the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial, a multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial to determine whether a basic office evaluation (OE) is non-inferior in terms of SUI surgery outcomes to office evaluation with addition of urodynamic studies (UDS). All participants underwent an OE; those patients who randomized to supplementary UDS underwent non-instrumented uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and a pressure flow study. Costs associated with UDS were calculated using 2014 U.S. Medicare allowable fees. Models using various patient populations and payor mixes were created to obtain a range of potential costs of performing UDS in patients undergoing SUI surgery annually in the United States. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty women were randomized to OE or OE plus UDS. There was no difference in surgical outcomes between the two groups. The per patient cost of UDS varied from site to site, and included complex cystometrogram $314-$343 (CPT codes 51728-51729) plus complex uroflowmetry $16 (CPT code 51741). Extrapolating these costs for US women similar to our study population, 13-33 million US dollars could be saved annually by not performing preoperative urodynamics. CONCLUSION: For women with uncomplicated SUI and a confirmatory preoperative basic office evaluation, tens of millions of dollars US could be saved annually by not performing urodynamic testing. In the management of such women, eliminating this preoperative test has a major economic benefit.