Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 20(12): 1474-1480, 2018 11 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29059372

RESUMO

Introduction: Disparities in receiving advice to quit smoking and other tobacco use from health professionals may contribute to the continuing gap in smoking prevalence among priority populations. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), beginning in 2010, tobacco cessation services are currently covered in private and public health insurance plans. Providers and hospitals are also incentivized through the Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to screen and document patients' tobacco use and deliver brief cessation counseling. This study analyzes trends and correlates of receiving health professionals' advice to quit and potential disparities among US adult smokers from 2010 to 2015. Methods: Data were from the National Health Interview Survey in 2010 and 2015. We analyzed the weighted prevalence of smokers' receipt of advice to quit smoking and other tobacco use from a health professional in 2010 and 2015 and correlates of receiving advice to quit. Results: Prevalence of receiving advice to quit from a health professional increased from 51.4% in 2010 to 60.6% in 2015. This positive trend was observed across tobacco disparity population groups. Survey year (2015), age (older), ethnicity (non-Hispanic), region (Northeast), poverty level (above 100% poverty level), past quit attempt, daily smoking, cigarettes per day (11+ per day), and psychological distress were associated with higher odds of receiving advice to quit. Conclusion: Based on national level data, receipt of advice to quit from health professionals increased between 2010 and 2015. However, disparities in receiving advice to quit from health professionals persist in certain populations. Implications: This study provides important data on the national trends in receipt of health professional advice to quit smoking and other tobacco use in the context of the ACA and Meaningful Use implementation and whether these policies helped to narrow the gaps in receipt of health professional advice among vulnerable populations.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Uso Significativo/tendências , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendências , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Uso de Tabaco/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Aconselhamento/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Health Serv Res ; 49(1 Pt 2): 421-37, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24359032

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Assess the Regional Extension Center (REC) program's progress toward its goal of supporting over 100,000 providers in small, rural, and underserved practices to achieve meaningful use (MU) of an electronic health record (EHR). DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data collected January 2010 through June 2013 via monitoring and evaluation of the 4-year REC program. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study of 62 REC programs. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Primary data collected from RECs were merged with nine other datasets, and descriptive statistics of progress by practice setting and penetration of targeted providers were calculated. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: RECs recruited almost 134,000 primary care providers (PCPs), or 44 percent of the nation's PCPs; 86 percent of these were using an EHR with advanced functionality and almost half (48 percent) have demonstrated MU. Eighty-three percent of Federally Qualified Health Centers and 78 percent of the nation's Critical Access Hospitals were participating with an REC. CONCLUSIONS: RECs have made substantial progress in assisting PCPs with adoption and MU of EHRs. This infrastructure supports small practices, community health centers, and rural and public hospitals to use technology for care delivery transformation and improvement.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Uso Significativo/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/tendências , Feminino , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Significativo/tendências , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Rural/tendências , Empresa de Pequeno Porte/organização & administração , Empresa de Pequeno Porte/tendências , Estados Unidos
6.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 32(8): 1470-7, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23840050

RESUMO

Expanding the use of interoperable electronic health record (EHR) systems to improve health care delivery is a national policy priority. We used the 2010-12 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey--Electronic Health Records Survey to examine which physicians in what types of practices are implementing the systems, and how they are using them. We found that 72 percent of physicians had adopted some type of system and that 40 percent had adopted capabilities required for a basic EHR system. The highest relative increases in adoption were among physicians with historically low adoption levels, including older physicians and those working in solo practices or community health centers. As of 2012, physicians in rural areas had higher rates of adoption than those in large urban areas, and physicians in counties with high rates of poverty had rates of adoption comparable to those in areas with less poverty. However, small practices continued to lag behind larger practices. Finally, the majority of physicians who adopted the EHR capabilities required to obtain federal financial incentives used the capabilities routinely, with few differences across physician groups.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/economia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Planos de Incentivos Médicos/economia , Planos de Incentivos Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Consultórios Médicos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Coleta de Dados , Previsões , Humanos , Uso Significativo/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso Significativo/tendências , Áreas de Pobreza , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
7.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 32(8): 1486-92, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23840051

RESUMO

Policy makers are actively promoting the electronic exchange of health information to improve the quality and efficiency of health care. We conducted a national survey of organizations facilitating health information exchange, to assess national progress. We found that 30 percent of hospitals and 10 percent of ambulatory practices now participate in one of the 119 operational health information exchange efforts across the United States, substantial growth from prior surveys. However, we also found that 74 percent of health information exchange efforts report struggling to develop a sustainable business model. Our findings suggest that despite progress, there is a substantial risk that many current efforts to promote health information exchange will fail when public funds supporting these initiatives are depleted.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/economia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Financiamento Governamental/tendências , Gestão da Informação em Saúde/economia , Gestão da Informação em Saúde/organização & administração , Custos e Análise de Custo/tendências , Coleta de Dados , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/tendências , Previsões , Gestão da Informação em Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Uso Significativo/economia , Uso Significativo/organização & administração , Uso Significativo/tendências , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA