Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Vacinação em Massa , Canadá , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Recusa de Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Recent evidence suggests that vaccination hesitancy is too high in many countries to sustainably contain COVID-19. Using a factorial survey experiment administered to 20,500 online respondents in Germany, we assess the effectiveness of three strategies to increase vaccine uptake, namely, providing freedoms, financial remuneration, and vaccination at local doctors. Our results suggest that all three strategies can increase vaccination uptake on the order of two to three percentage points (PP) overall and five PP among the undecided. The combined effects could be as high as 13 PP for this group. The returns from different strategies vary across age groups, however, with older cohorts more responsive to local access and younger cohorts most responsive to enhanced freedoms for vaccinated citizens.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Motivação/ética , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinação em Massa/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Psicológicos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In Italy, in recent years, vaccination coverage for key immunizations as MMR has been declining to worryingly low levels, with large measles outbreaks. As a response in 2017, the Italian government expanded the number of mandatory immunizations introducing penalties to unvaccinated children's families. During the 2018 general elections campaign, immunization policy entered the political debate with the government in-charge blaming oppositions for fuelling vaccine scepticism. A new government (formerly in the opposition) established in 2018 temporarily relaxed penalties and announced the introduction of forms of flexibility. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: First, we supplied a definition of disorientation, as the "lack of well-established and resilient opinions among individuals, therefore causing them to change their positions as a consequence of sufficient external perturbations". Second, procedures for testing for the presence of both short and longer-term collective disorientation in Twitter signals were proposed. Third, a sentiment analysis on tweets posted in Italian during 2018 on immunization topics, and related polarity evaluations, were used to investigate whether the contrasting announcements at the highest political level might have originated disorientation amongst the Italian public. RESULTS: Vaccine-relevant tweeters' interactions peaked in response to main political events. Out of retained tweets, 70.0% resulted favourable to vaccination, 16.4% unfavourable, and 13.6% undecided, respectively. The smoothed time series of polarity proportions exhibit frequent large changes in the favourable proportion, superimposed to a clear up-and-down trend synchronized with the switch between governments in Spring 2018, suggesting evidence of disorientation among the public. CONCLUSIONS: The reported evidence of disorientation for opinions expressed in online social media shows that critical health topics, such as vaccination, should never be used to achieve political consensus. This is worsened by the lack of a strong Italian institutional presence on Twitter, calling for efforts to contrast misinformation and the ensuing spread of hesitancy. It remains to be seen how this disorientation will impact future parents' vaccination decisions.
Assuntos
Confusão , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Opinião Pública , Mídias Sociais/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde/tendências , Itália , Vacinação em Massa/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Política , Cobertura Vacinal/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite progress in vaccination coverage, timeliness of childhood vaccination remains a challenge in many settings. We aimed to assess if mobile phone-based reminders and incentives to health workers and caregivers could increase timely neonatal vaccination in a rural, low-resource setting. METHODS: We conducted an open-label cluster randomized controlled 1:1:1 trial with three arms in 15 communities in Northern Ghana. Communities were randomized to 1) a voice call reminder intervention; 2) a community health volunteer (CHV) intervention with incentivized rewards; 3) control. In the voice call reminder arm, a study staff member made voice calls to mothers shortly after birth to encourage vaccination and provide personalized information about available vaccination services. In the incentive arm, CHVs promoted infant vaccination and informed women with recent births about available vaccination opportunities. Both CHVs and women were provided small monetary incentives for on-time early infant vaccination in this arm, delivered using mobile phone-based banking applications. No study activities were conducted in control communities. A population-based survey compared vaccination coverage across arms in the pre-intervention and intervention periods. The primary endpoint was completion of at least one dose of Polio vaccine within 14 days of life and BCG vaccination within 28 days of life. RESULTS: Six-hundred ninety births were identified; 106, 88, and 88 from pre-intervention and 150, 135, and 123 in the intervention period, in the control, voice call reminder and CHV incentive arms, respectively. In adjusted intent-to-treat analysis, voice call reminders were associated with 10.5 percentage point (95% CI: 4.0, 17.1) higher coverage of on-time vaccination, while mobile phone-based incentives were associated with 49.5 percentage point (95% CI: 26.4, 72.5) higher coverage. CONCLUSION: Community-based interventions using mobile phone technologies can improve timely early vaccination coverage. A CHV approach with incentives to community workers and caregivers was a more effective strategy than voice call reminders. The impact of vaccination "nudges" via voice calls may be constrained in settings where network coverage and phone ownership are limited. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03797950.
Assuntos
Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Reembolso de Incentivo , Sistemas de Alerta , Adulto , Vacina BCG/administração & dosagem , Telefone Celular , Feminino , Gana , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Vacinação em Massa/economia , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Poliovirus/administração & dosagem , Recompensa , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricosAssuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacinação em Massa , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/classificação , Vacinas contra COVID-19/farmacologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/tendências , Previsões , Saúde Global , Humanos , Imunidade Coletiva , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Pandemias/economia , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Cobertura Vacinal/organização & administração , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologiaAssuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Dengue/efeitos adversos , Comunicação em Saúde , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Dengue/administração & dosagem , Equidade em Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/efeitos adversos , Vacinação em Massa/normas , Filipinas , ConfiançaAssuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Saúde Global/economia , Cooperação Internacional , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/economia , Países Desenvolvidos/economia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Carga Global da Doença/economia , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/economia , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Pandemias/economia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Organização Mundial da SaúdeAssuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde , Máscaras , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Saúde Pública , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Canadá , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Máscaras/ética , Autonomia Pessoal , Saúde Pública/ética , SARS-CoV-2 , ConfiançaRESUMO
We conducted a cross-sectional survey to better understand the barriers to attendance at canine rabies vaccination campaigns in Haiti. A structured community-based questionnaire was conducted over a 15-day period during May-June 2017, focused on socio-economic status correlated with participation at canine rabies vaccination campaigns. Questions phrased as a bidding game were asked to determine individuals' willingness to pay (WTP) for dog rabies vaccination and willingness to walk (WTW) to fixed-point vaccination campaigns. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was applied to determine relationships between survey variables. Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with participants' WTP and WTW. A total of 748 households from eight communities were surveyed. Respondents were predominantly female (54.4%) and had a median age of 45 years. The total number of owned dogs reported from households was 926, yielding a human-to-dog ratio in dog-owning households of 5.2:1. The majority of dogs (87.2%) were acquired for security, and 49% were allowed to roam freely; 42.0% of dog owners reported that they were unable to manage (or restrain) their dogs using a leash. Seventy per cent of dog owners were willing to pay up to 15.9 gourdes (0.25 USD) and/or walk up to 75 m to vaccinate their dogs. Households that owned free-roaming dogs, owned dogs for the purpose of companionship and owned dogs that they were unable to walk on a leash were associated with a higher WTP for vaccination. Living in Artibonite Department, having a middle or higher household income, and owning a dog for security purpose were associated with a higher WTW for vaccination. Low leash use and propensity for dogs to roam freely are barriers to successful fixed-point vaccination methods in Haiti, and alternative methods such as door to door (DD), capture-vaccinate-release (CVR) or oral vaccination should be explored. There may be some prospect for fee-for-service vaccination in Haiti; however, this programme should be introduced as a supplement, rather than a replacement for free rabies vaccination programmes so that mass dog vaccination is not discouraged.
Assuntos
Doenças do Cão/prevenção & controle , Vacinação em Massa/veterinária , Raiva/veterinária , Classe Social , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Estudos Transversais , Cães , Feminino , Haiti , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) arising from anxiety have rarely been reported as a cluster(s) in the setting of a mass vaccination program. Reports of clusters of anxiety-related AEFIs are understudied. Social media and the web may be a resource for public health investigators. METHODS: We searched Google and Facebook separately from Atlanta and Geneva to identify reports of cluster anxiety-related AEFIs. We reviewed a sample of reports summarizing year, country/setting, vaccine involved, patient symptoms, clinical management, and impact to vaccination programs. RESULTS: We found 39 reports referring to 18 unique cluster events. Some reports were only found based on the geographic location from where the search was performed. The most common vaccine implicated in reports was human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (48.7%). The majority of reports (97.4%) involved children and vaccination programs in school settings or as part of national vaccination campaigns. Five vaccination programs were reportedly halted because of these cluster events. In this study, we identified 18 cluster events that were not published in traditional scientific peer-reviewed literature. CONCLUSIONS: Social media and online search engines are useful resources for identifying reports of cluster anxiety-related AEFIs and the geographic location of the researcher is an important factor to consider when conducting these studies. Solely relying upon traditional peer-reviewed journals may seriously underestimate the occurrence of such cluster events.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Vacinação em Massa/efeitos adversos , Mídias Sociais , Adolescente , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Saúde Pública , Ferramenta de BuscaRESUMO
The development and licensing of a nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality from HPV-related cancers beyond that of first generation HPV vaccines. However, this benefit can only be realised if the offer of vaccination is accepted. Uptake of first generation HPV vaccines is not complete and shows huge global variation. In addition to practical and financial challenges to optimising coverage, behavioural issues explain a large proportion of the variance in vaccine receipt. This commentary draws on the findings of over a decade of behavioural science research seeking to understand uptake of first generation HPV vaccines, in order to anticipate challenges to implement the nonavalent HPV vaccine. Challenges include distrust of combination vaccines, uncertainty about long-term efficacy, distrust of a new and (perceived to be) untested vaccine, cost and uncertainty regarding interchanging doses of first generation and nonavalent vaccines and the appropriateness of revaccination. We use behavioural science theory and existing evaluations of interventions to increase uptake of vaccines to identify evidence-based approaches that can be implemented by vaccine stakeholders to address parents' concerns and maximise uptake of the nonavalent HPV vaccine.
Assuntos
Ciências do Comportamento , Vacinação em Massa , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/economia , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologiaRESUMO
In this work, we investigate the spread and control of sexually transmitted diseases when a game-theory based vaccination strategy is involved. An individual's decision on vaccination uptake may follow a cost-benefit analysis since the individual obtains immunity against the disease from the vaccination and, at the same time, may have some perceived side effects. Evolutionary game theory is integrated into the epidemic model to reveal the relationship between individuals' voluntary decisions on vaccination uptake and the spread and control of such diseases. We show that decreasing the perceived cost of taking vaccine or increasing the payoff from social obligation is beneficial to controlling the disease. It is also shown how the "degree of rationality" of males and females affects the disease spread through the net payoff of the game. In particular, individual awareness of the consequences of the disease on the infectives also contributes to slowing down the disease spread. By analyzing an asymmetric version of our evolutionary game, it is shown that the disease is better controlled when individuals are more sensitive to fitness differences when net payoff is positive than when it is negative.
Assuntos
Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Número Básico de Reprodução , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tomada de Decisões , Epidemias/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Teoria dos Jogos , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Conceitos Matemáticos , Modelos Biológicos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of the RTS,S malaria vaccine have completed Phase III and the vaccine is on track for registration. Before making decisions about implementation, it is essential to prepare the ground for introducing the vaccine by assessing awareness and willingness to use malaria vaccines and to provide policy makers with evidence-based information on the best strategies to engage communities to manage the introduction of malaria vaccine in Tanzania. METHODS: In November 2011, as part of a large cross-sectional study of all 23 regions of Tanzania (mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar) was conducted during Tanzanian Integrated Measles Campaign (IMC) survey. In this study, the variables of interests were awareness and willingness to use a malaria vaccine. The main outcome measure was willingness to use a malaria vaccine. Logistic regression was used to examine the influence of predictive factors. RESULTS: A representative sample of 5502 (out of 6210) women, aged 18 years or older and with children under 11 months old, was selected to participate, using random sampling probability. Awareness of the forthcoming malaria vaccine, 11.8 % of participants in mainland Tanzania responded affirmatively, compared to 3.4 % in Zanzibar (p value <0.0001). 94.5 % of all respondents were willing to vaccinate their children against malaria, with a slight difference between mainland Tanzania (94.3 %) and Zanzibar (96.8 %) (p value = 0.0167). CONCLUSIONS: Although mothers had low awareness and high willingness to use malaria vaccine, still availability of malaria vaccine RTS,S will compliment other existing malaria interventions and it will be implemented through the Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB) programme (formerly EPI). The information generated from this study can aid policy makers in planning and setting priorities for introducing and implementing the malaria vaccine.
Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vacinas Antimaláricas , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Percepção , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Comunicação em Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tanzânia , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Doadores de Sangue/legislação & jurisprudência , Diagnóstico Precoce , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Promoção da Saúde/normas , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Imunidade Coletiva/efeitos dos fármacos , Vacinação em Massa/história , Vacinação em Massa/legislação & jurisprudência , Sarampo/diagnóstico , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/história , Vacina contra Sarampo/história , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Pediatria/história , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
In 1988, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) was launched with the goal of eradicating polio by the year 2000. After 25 years, several dynamics still challenge this large public health campaign with new cases of polio being reported annually. We examine the roots of this initiative to eradicate polio, its scope, the successes and setbacks during the last 25 years and reflect on the current state of affairs. We examine the social and political factors that are barriers to polio eradication. Options are discussed for solving the current impasse of polio eradication: using force, respecting individual freedoms and gaining support from those vulnerable to fundamentalist 'propaganda'. The travails of the GPEI indicate the need for expanding the Convention on the Rights of the Child to address situations of war and civic strife. Such a cultural and structural reference will provide the basis for global stakeholders to engage belligerent local actors whose local political conflicts are barriers to the eradication of polio. Disregard for these actors will result in stagnation of polio eradication policy, delaying eradication beyond 2018.
Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças , Saúde Global , Política de Saúde , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Poliomielite/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Poliovirus/história , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Poliomielite/epidemiologia , Poliomielite/história , Vacinas contra Poliovirus/administração & dosagem , PolíticaAssuntos
Regulamentação Governamental , Paternalismo , Autonomia Pessoal , Política , Saúde Pública , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Individualidade , Lactente , Vacinação em Massa/enfermagem , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Sarampo/enfermagem , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Sarampo/psicologia , Sarampo/transmissão , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/efeitos adversos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Justiça Social/psicologia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
From 2008 to 2011, schoolgirls were vaccinated against HPV in two districts in Uganda following sensitization. This study assessed girls' knowledge of cervical cancer and HPV vaccine, and their acceptance of future vaccination of friends and hypothetical daughters. The cross-sectional, mixed methods comparative study was conducted in two districts. Univariate, bivariate, logistic regression and thematic analyses were done. HPV vaccination was positively associated with knowledge (Crude OR: 5.31, CI: 3.19-8.86; p = 0.000); but knowledge (Adjusted OR: 1.13, CI: 0.56-2.28; p = 0.73) and HPV vaccination (Adjusted OR: 0.92, CI: 0.16-5.36; p = 0.93) did not predict vaccine acceptability. Seemingly important motivations for vaccine acceptance were: its role in cancer prevention and advancement of reproductive health, minimal side effects, and positive peer role models. Major deterrents to vaccine acceptance were: rumours and misconceptions about possible side effects, perceived inadequate information about vaccine, and fear of side effects.
Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente , Vacinação em Massa , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Saúde Reprodutiva , UgandaRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to examine how social and behavioral factors such as age of first intercourse, mother-daughter communication, and perceived norms are associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination behaviors, and whether ethnicity moderates those associations (non-Latina White versus Latina participants). From June through December 2009, we surveyed a community sample of 309 White and Latina women, ages 15 to 30. We recruited participants from local health care clinics in Des Moines, Iowa. Vaccination status was not significantly different for Whites versus Latinas. The effects of age at first intercourse, mother-daughter communication about values related to sex, and descriptive norms of HPV vaccine uptake were all significantly moderated by ethnicity. The current findings reveal that sociocultural and behavioral factors that affect HPV vaccine uptake do not affect White and Latina women in the same fashion. In the future, public health campaigns about HPV and the HPV vaccine may be more effective if their messages are sensitive to these differences.
Assuntos
Hispânico ou Latino/etnologia , Vacinação em Massa/etnologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , População Branca/etnologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Humanos , Iowa/etnologia , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Mãe-Filho/etnologia , Relações Mãe-Filho/psicologia , Comportamento Sexual/etnologia , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , População Branca/psicologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
For decades vaccine program managers and governments have devoted many resources to addressing public vaccine concerns, vaccine risk perception, risk management and safety assessment. Despite ever growing evidence that vaccines are safe and effective, public concerns continue. Education and evidence based scientific messages have not ended concerns. How can governments and programs more effectively address the public's vaccine concerns and increase confidence in the vaccine safety system? Vaccination hesitation has been attributed to concerns about vaccine safety, perceptions of high vaccine risks and low disease risk and consequences. Even when the public believes vaccines are important for protection many still have concerns about vaccine safety. This overview explores how heuristics affect public perception of vaccines and vaccine safety, how the public finds and uses vaccine information, and then proposes strategies for changes in the approach to vaccine safety communications. Facts and evidence confirming the safety of vaccines are not enough. Vaccine beliefs and behaviours must be shaped. This will require a shift in the what, when, how and why of vaccine risk and benefit communication content and practice. A change to a behavioural change strategy such as the WHO COMBI program that has been applied to disease eradication efforts is suggested.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Governo , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Segurança do Paciente , Percepção/fisiologia , Opinião Pública , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Comunicação , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Promoção da Saúde/normas , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Risco , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pandemic preparedness and response (as with all public health actions) occur within a social, cultural, and historical context of preexisting health disparities and, in some populations, underlying mistrust in government. Almost 200,000 people received H1N1 vaccine at 109 free, public mass vaccination clinics operated by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health between October 23, 2009, and December 8, 2009. Wide racial/ethnic disparities in vaccination rates were observed with African Americans having the lowest rate followed by whites. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Demographic information, including race/ethnicity, was obtained for 163 087 of the Los Angeles County residents who received vaccine. This information was compared with estimates of the Los Angeles County population distribution by race/ethnicity. Rate ratios of vaccination were as follows: white, reference; African American, 0.5; Asian, 3.2; Hispanic, 1.5; Native American, 1.9; and Pacific Islander, 4.3. SIGNIFICANCE: Significant political challenges and media coverage focused on equity in vaccination access specifically in the African American population. An important challenge was community-level informal messaging that ran counter to the "official" messages. Finally, we present a partnership strategy, developed in response to the challenges, to improve outreach and build trust and engagement with African Americans in Los Angeles County.