Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 54
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 19(7): 611-620, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32608272

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The national and international guidelines recommend evaluating all healthcare workers (HCWs) for their measles immune status and possibly vaccinating those who are seronegative. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to estimate the rate of measles susceptibility among HCWs in Italy and to explore possible options for the management of those found to be susceptible. Twenty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of HCWs susceptible to measles was 11.5% (95%CI = 8.1-15.4%) and was higher in studies in which prevalence was evaluated by survey (16.7%; 95%CI = 8.9-26.3) than by the direct evaluation of blood specimens (9.1%; 95%CI = 6.2-12.5%). Occupational medicine examinations for measles screening with possible subsequent vaccination of seronegatives and the exclusion of susceptible HCWs from high-risk settings were common management strategies. EXPERT OPINION: HCWs susceptible to measles are an important epidemiological concern in Italy, and efforts to identify and actively offer the vaccine to this population should be increased.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Humanos , Itália , Sarampo/imunologia , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Medicina do Trabalho , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Vacinação
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 481, 2020 Jul 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32635891

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ethiopia has low measles immunization coverage and little is known about the disparities surrounding what coverage is provided. This study assessed disparities in measles immunization and its change over time using the four Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2000 and 2016. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of data using Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys (EDHS) conducted between 2000 and 2016. We used the World Health Organization's (WHO) Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) to present the inequalities. Four measures of inequality were calculated: Difference (D), Ratio (R), Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) and Population Attributable Risk (PAR). The results were disaggregated by wealth, education, residence, sex and sub-national regions and 95% Uncertainty Intervals (UIs) were computed for each point estimate to boost confidence of the findings. RESULTS: Measles immunization coverage was higher among the richest and secondary and above schools' subgroup by nearly 30 to 31 percentage points based on point estimates (D = 31%; 95% CI; 19.48, 42.66) and 29.8 percentage points (D = 29.8%; 95% CI; 16.57, 43.06) as compared to the poorest and no education subgroup respectively in the 2016 survey. Still, in the 2016 survey, substantial economic status (PAF = 36.73; 95%CI: 29.78, 43.68), (R = 1.71; 95%CI: 1.35, 2.08), education status (PAF = 45.07; 95% CI: 41.95, 48.18), (R = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.30, 1.90), place of residence (PAF = 39.84, 95% CI: 38.40, 41.27), (R = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20, 1. 74) and regional (PAF = 71.35, 95% CI: 31.76, 110.95), (R = 3.09, 95%CI: 2.01, 4.17) inequality were observed with both simple and complex measures. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of measles immunization between male and female children in all the studied years, as indicated, for instance, by measures of PAF in 2000 (PAF = 0; 95%CI: - 6.79, 6.79), 2005 (PAF = 0; 95%CI: - 6.04, 6.04), 2011(PAF = 0; 95%CI: - 3.79, 3.79) and 2016 (PAF = 2.66; - 1.67; 6.99). Overall, the inequality of measles immunization narrowed significantly by at least some of the measures between the first and the last survey periods across all the studied subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: National, regional and district levels of government should make a pledge to reduce inequalities in coverage of measles immunization. Equity-sensitive strategies, sufficient human and financial resources as well as continued research and monitoring of immunization coverage inequalities are necessary to achieve related sustainable development goals.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Vacina contra Sarampo/uso terapêutico , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/tendências , Vacinação/tendências , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Sarampo/virologia , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Morbillivirus/imunologia , Pobreza , Inquéritos e Questionários , Organização Mundial da Saúde
4.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 12545, 2019 08 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31467441

RESUMO

Measles and rubella are important causes of morbidity and mortality globally. Despite high coverage reported for measles vaccination, outbreaks continue to occur in some countries. The reasons for these outbreaks are poorly understood. We apply Bayesian methods to multi-valent seroprevalence data for measles and rubella, collected 2 years and 3 months after a mass measles-rubella vaccination campaign in Lao PDR to estimate the immunogenicity and vaccination coverage. When the vaccination coverage was constrained to exceed 95% or 90%, consistent with officially-reported values, the immunogenicity of the measles vaccine component was unexpectedly low (75% (95% CR: 63-82%) and 79% (CR: 70-87%) respectively. The estimated immunogenicity increased after relaxing constraints on the vaccination coverage, with best-fitting values of 83% (95% CR: 73-91%) and 97% (95% CR: 90-100%) for the measles and rubella components respectively, with an estimated coverage of 83% (95% CR: 80-88%). The findings suggest that, if the vaccine coverage was as high as that reported, continuing measles outbreaks in Lao PDR, and potentially elsewhere, may be attributable to suboptimal immunogenicity attained in mass campaigns. Vaccine management in countries with high reported levels of coverage and ongoing measles outbreaks needs to be reviewed if measles elimination targets are to be achieved.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Vacina contra Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Rubéola/imunologia , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Laos , Masculino , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cobertura Vacinal , Adulto Jovem
5.
Vaccine ; 37(32): 4511-4517, 2019 07 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266670

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The strategy to Eliminate Yellow Fever Epidemics (EYE) is a global initiative that includes all countries with risk of yellow fever (YF) virus transmission. Of these, 40 countries (27 in Africa and 13 in the Americas) are considered high-risk and targeted for interventions to increase coverage of YF vaccine. Even though the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that YF vaccine be given concurrently with the first dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) in YF-endemic settings, estimated coverage for MCV1 and YF vaccine have varied widely. The objective of this study was to review global data sources to assess discrepancies in YF vaccine and MCV1 coverage and identify plausible reasons for these discrepancies. METHODS: We conducted a desk review of data from 34 countries (22 in Africa, 12 in Latin America), from 2006 to 2016, with national introduction of YF vaccine and listed as high-risk by the EYE strategy. Data reviewed included procured and administered doses, immunization schedules, routine coverage estimates and reported vaccine stock-outs. In the 30 countries included in the comparitive analysis, differences greater than 3 percentage points between YF vaccine and MCV1 coverage were considered meaningful. RESULTS: In America, there were meaningful differences (7-45%) in coverage of the two vaccines in 6 (67%) of the 9 countries. In Africa, there were meaningful differences (4-27%) in coverage of the two vaccines in 9 (43%) of the 21 countries. Nine countries (26%) reported MVC1 stock-outs while sixteen countries (47%) reported YF vaccine stock-outs for three or more years during 2006-2016. CONCLUSION: In countries reporting significant differences in coverage of the two vaccines, differences may be driven by different target populations and vaccine availability. However,these were not sufficient to completely explain observed differences. Further follow-up is needed to identify possible reasons for differences in coverage rates in several countries where these could not fully be explained.


Assuntos
Saúde Global/economia , Vacina contra Sarampo/economia , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Vacinação/economia , Vacina contra Febre Amarela/economia , Vacina contra Febre Amarela/imunologia , África , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/economia , América Latina , Sarampo/economia , Sarampo/imunologia , Organização Mundial da Saúde/economia , Febre Amarela/economia , Febre Amarela/imunologia , Vírus da Febre Amarela/imunologia
6.
Vaccine ; 37(17): 2356-2368, 2019 04 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30914223

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The lack of specific policies on how many children must be present at a vaccinating location before a healthcare worker can open a measles-containing vaccine (MCV) - i.e. the vial-opening threshold - has led to inconsistent practices, which can have wide-ranging systems effects. METHODS: Using HERMES-generated simulation models of the routine immunization supply chains of Benin, Mozambique and Niger, we evaluated the impact of different vial-opening thresholds (none, 30% of doses must be used, 60%) and MCV presentations (10-dose, 5-dose) on each supply chain. We linked these outputs to a clinical- and economic-outcomes model which translated the change in vaccine availability to associated infections, medical costs, and DALYs. We calculated the economic impact of each policy from the health system perspective. RESULTS: The vial-opening threshold that maximizes vaccine availability while minimizing costs varies between individual countries. In Benin (median session size = 5), implementing a 30% vial-opening threshold and tailoring distribution of 10-dose and 5-dose MCVs to clinics based on session size is the most cost-effective policy, preventing 671 DALYs ($471/DALY averted) compared to baseline (no threshold, 10-dose MCVs). In Niger (median MCV session size = 9), setting a 60% vial-opening threshold and tailoring MCV presentations is the most cost-effective policy, preventing 2897 DALYs ($16.05/ DALY averted). In Mozambique (median session size = 3), setting a 30% vial-opening threshold using 10-dose MCVs is the only beneficial policy compared to baseline, preventing 3081 DALYs ($85.98/DALY averted). Across all three countries, however, a 30% vial-opening threshold using 10-dose MCVs everywhere is the only MCV threshold that consistently benefits each system compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: While the ideal vial-opening threshold policy for MCV varies by supply chain, implementing a 30% vial-opening threshold for 10-dose MCVs benefits each system by improving overall vaccine availability and reducing associated medical costs and DALYs compared to no threshold.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Programas de Imunização/economia , Vacina contra Sarampo/economia , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Modelos Teóricos , Vacinação/economia , Algoritmos , Humanos , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos
7.
Vaccine ; 37(17): 2377-2386, 2019 04 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30922700

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since special efforts are necessary to vaccinate people living far from fixed vaccination posts, decision makers are interested in knowing the economic value of such efforts. METHODS: Using our immunization geospatial information system platform and a measles compartment model, we quantified the health and economic value of a 2-dose measles immunization outreach strategy for children <24 months of age in Kenya who are geographically hard-to-reach (i.e., those living outside a specified catchment radius from fixed vaccination posts, which served as a proxy for access to services). FINDINGS: When geographically hard-to-reach children were not vaccinated, there were 1427 total measles cases from 2016 to 2020, resulting in $9.5 million ($3.1-$18.1 million) in direct medical costs and productivity losses and 7504 (3338-12,903) disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The outreach strategy cost $76 ($23-$142)/DALY averted (compared to no outreach) when 25% of geographically hard-to-reach children received MCV1, $122 ($40-$226)/DALY averted when 50% received MCV1, and $274 ($123-$478)/DALY averted when 100% received MCV1. CONCLUSION: Outreach vaccination among geographically hard-to-reach populations was highly cost-effective in a wide variety of scenarios, offering support for investment in an effective outreach vaccination strategy.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Vacina contra Sarampo/economia , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Geografia Médica , Humanos , Quênia/epidemiologia , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Modelos Teóricos , Vigilância da População , Vacinação/economia , Vacinação/métodos
8.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 932019 Mar 05.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30833540

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In the month of April 2017, two cases of measles were reported in one of the basic health zones (ZBS) of the Region of Murcia. The Occupational Risk Prevention Services of the Murcian Health Service (SMS) were urged to review the immunological status of health workers, born as of 1971, from Primary Care Centers, referral hospitals and emergency services that cover the affected area with the general objective of preventing the appearance of a possible outbreak of measles in this personnel, checking the protection of these workers against this disease (the vaccine status and / or the serological status (IgG)) and offering the vaccine to non-immune workers. METHODS: A descriptive study of the prevalence of protection against measles of this group of workers during the period from January to February 2017 was carried out. Initially, the stories of the workers for whom data were available were reviewed, and cited for the provision of vaccine data (90) or extraction of serology to those for whom data were not available (138). RESULTS: 408 medical records / workers were reviewed. At the end of the study, we did have data about the vaccination of 22.1% of the workers and serology of the 33.8%. 91.5% of the workers for whom we had data were protected against measles. CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that the coverage among our workers is lower than that proposed by the Measles and Rubella Elimination Plan, so a program to promote vaccination against this disease among health personnel would be advisable.


OBJETIVO: En el mes de abril de 2017 se notificaron dos casos de sarampión en una de las zonas básicas de salud (ZBS) de la Región de Murcia. Los Servicios de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales del Servicio Murciano de Salud (SMS) fueron instados a revisar el estado inmunológico de los trabajadores sanitarios nacidos a partir de 1971, de los centros de atención primaria, hospitales de referencia y servicios de urgencias que dan cobertura a la zona afectada con el objetivo general de prevenir la aparición de un posible brote de sarampión en este personal, comprobando la protección de estos trabajadores frente a esta enfermedad (el estado vacunal y/o el estado serológico (IgG)) y ofreciendo la vacuna a aquellos trabajadores no inmunes. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la prevalencia de la protección frente a sarampión de los trabajadores sanitarios de la zona afectada. METODOS: Durante el periodo de enero a febrero de 2017, se revisaron las historias de los trabajadores, de los que disponíamos de datos, y posteriormente se citaron a los trabajadores de los que no teníamos información para que aportaran la cartilla de vacunación (90 trabajadores) o para realizarles una serología a los que carecían de ella (138 trabajadores). RESULTADOS: Tras la revisión de 408 historias clínicas se obtuvieron datos acerca de la vacunación del 22,1% de los trabajadores y de serologías del 33,8%. El 91,5% de estos trabajadores estaba protegido frente al sarampión. CONCLUSIONES: La cobertura entre nuestros trabajadores es menor a la propuesta por el "Plan de Eliminación del Sarampión y la Rubéola", por lo que recomendamos entre el personal sanitario, un programa de fomento de la vacunación frente a dicha enfermedad.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Sarampo/imunologia , Doenças Profissionais/imunologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
9.
Cent Eur J Public Health ; 26(2): 79-82, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30102493

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Between February 2014 and September 2015 a large measles outbreak (5,084 cases) occurred in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FB&H). The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of routine measles vaccination in the FB&H. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of the resurgence period surveillance data and a retrospective cohort study involving primary school aged children in randomly selected schools. RESULTS: Measles cases occurred among all age groups, mostly among the unvaccinated. Among fully immunized, 2.1% contracted measles. Measles vaccine effectiveness was high. The study indicates that one dose reduced the risk for measles by 91.9% (95% CI: 81.4-96.4%), two doses reduced the risk by 97.3% (95% CI: 95.5-98.4%). No evidence of waning immunity was found. Our survey reveals that a significant number of children had no immunization status registered. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the resurgence was likely caused by an accumulation of measles-susceptible children not being vaccinated. This vaccine effectiveness study does not support possible vaccination failure as a contributing factor.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Vacina contra Sarampo , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Bósnia e Herzegóvina , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Vaccine ; 36(12): 1583-1591, 2018 03 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29454519

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The expansion of childhood vaccination programs in low and middle income countries has been a substantial public health success story. Indicators of the performance of intervention programmes such as coverage levels and numbers covered are typically measured through national statistics or at the scale of large regions due to survey design, administrative convenience or operational limitations. These mask heterogeneities and 'coldspots' of low coverage that may allow diseases to persist, even if overall coverage is high. Hence, to decrease inequities and accelerate progress towards disease elimination goals, fine-scale variation in coverage should be better characterized. METHODS: Using measles as an example, cluster-level Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data were used to map vaccination coverage at 1 km spatial resolution in Cambodia, Mozambique and Nigeria for varying age-group categories of children under five years, using Bayesian geostatistical techniques built on a suite of publicly available geospatial covariates and implemented via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. RESULTS: Measles vaccination coverage was found to be strongly predicted by just 4-5 covariates in geostatistical models, with remoteness consistently selected as a key variable. The output 1 × 1 km maps revealed significant heterogeneities within the three countries that were not captured using province-level summaries. Integration with population data showed that at the time of the surveys, few districts attained the 80% coverage, that is one component of the WHO Global Vaccine Action Plan 2020 targets. CONCLUSION: The elimination of vaccine-preventable diseases requires a strong evidence base to guide strategies and inform efficient use of limited resources. The approaches outlined here provide a route to moving beyond large area summaries of vaccination coverage that mask epidemiologically-important heterogeneities to detailed maps that capture subnational vulnerabilities. The output datasets are built on open data and methods, and in flexible format that can be aggregated to more operationally-relevant administrative unit levels.


Assuntos
Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Algoritmos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Países em Desenvolvimento , Geografia Médica , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Cadeias de Markov , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Método de Monte Carlo , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Vacinas
11.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 14(4): 875-880, 2018 04 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29252094

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the potential achievable coverage of the second dose of measles containing vaccine (MCV2) when the protocol of simultaneous administration of childhood vaccines was fully implemented. Risk factors for missed opportunity (MO) for simultaneous administration of MCV2 were also investigated. METHODS: Children born from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2014 and registered in Zhejiang provincial immunization information system were enrolled in this study. The MO of simultaneous administration of MCV2, the actual age-appropriate coverage (AAC) of MCV2 and the potentially achievable coverage (PAC) of MCV2 were evaluated and compared across different birth cohorts, by different socio-demographic variables. For the 2014 birth cohort, logistic regression model was used to detect the risk factors of MOs, from both socio-demographic and vaccination service providing aspects. RESULTS: Compared to the AAC, the PAC of MCV2 increased significantly from 2005 birth cohort to 2014 birth cohort (p<0.001), with a median of 12.7 percentage points. Higher birth order of children, resident children, higher maternal education background, higher socio-economic development level of resident areas, less frequent vaccination service, and shorter vaccination service time were significant risk factors of MO for simultaneous administration of MCV2, with all p-value < 0.05. CONCLUSION: The findings in this study suggest that fully utilization of all opportunities for simultaneous administration of all age-eligible vaccine doses at the same vaccination visit is critical for achieving the coverage target of 95% for MCV2. Future interventions focusing on the group with risk factors observed could substantially eliminate MOs for simultaneous administration of MCV2, further to improve the coverage of fully immunization of MCV, and finally achieve the goal of eliminating measles.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Sarampo/imunologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização/métodos , Programas de Imunização/métodos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Vacinação/métodos , Cobertura Vacinal/métodos
12.
Vaccine ; 35(45): 6187-6194, 2017 10 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28966000

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: One of the goals of the Global Measles and Rubella Strategic Plan is the reduction in global measles mortality, with high measles vaccination coverage as one of its core components. While measles mortality has been reduced more than 79%, the disease remains a major cause of childhood vaccine preventable disease burden globally. Measles immunization requires a two-dose schedule and only countries with strong, stable immunization programs can rely on routine services to deliver the second dose. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), weak health infrastructure and lack of provision of the second dose of measles vaccine necessitates the use of supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) to administer the second dose. METHODS: We modeled three vaccination strategies using an age-structured SIR (Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered) model to simulate natural measles dynamics along with the effect of immunization. We compared the cost-effectiveness of two different strategies for the second dose of Measles Containing Vaccine (MCV) to one dose of MCV through routine immunization services over a 15-year time period for a hypothetical birth cohort of 3 million children. RESULTS: Compared to strategy 1 (MCV1 only), strategy 2 (MCV2 by SIA) would prevent a total of 5,808,750 measles cases, 156,836 measles-related deaths and save U.S. $199 million. Compared to strategy 1, strategy 3 (MCV2 by RI) would prevent a total of 13,232,250 measles cases, 166,475 measles-related deaths and save U.S. $408 million. DISCUSSION: Vaccination recommendations should be tailored to each country, offering a framework where countries can adapt to local epidemiological and economical circumstances in the context of other health priorities. Our results reflect the synergistic effect of two doses of MCV and demonstrate that the most cost-effective approach to measles vaccination in DRC is to incorporate the second dose of MCV in the RI schedule provided that high enough coverage can be achieved.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Vacina contra Sarampo/economia , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Sarampo/economia , Sarampo/imunologia , Vacinação/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , República Democrática do Congo , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/economia , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Sarampo/prevenção & controle
13.
Viruses ; 9(1)2017 01 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28106841

RESUMO

Measles is a highly contagious, vaccine preventable disease. Measles results in a systemic illness which causes profound immunosuppression often leading to severe complications. In 2010, the World Health Assembly declared that measles can and should be eradicated. Measles has been eliminated in the Region of the Americas, and the remaining five regions of the World Health Organization (WHO) have adopted measles elimination goals. Significant progress has been made through increased global coverage of first and second doses of measles-containing vaccine, leading to a decrease in global incidence of measles, and through improved case based surveillance supported by the WHO Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network. Improved vaccine delivery methods will likely play an important role in achieving measles elimination goals as these delivery methods circumvent many of the logistic issues associated with subcutaneous injection. This review highlights the status of global measles epidemiology, novel measles vaccination strategies, and describes the pathway toward measles elimination.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Animais , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Erradicação de Doenças/organização & administração , Saúde Global , Humanos , Sarampo/imunologia , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Organização Mundial da Saúde
14.
PLoS One ; 11(3): e0150537, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27003589

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The implemented multiple-strategy community intervention National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) between 2005 and 2012 aimed to reduce maternal and child health (MCH) inequalities across geographical, socioeconomic and gender categories in India. The objective of this study is to quantify the extent of reduction in these inequalities pre- and post-NRHM in Haryana, North India. METHODS: Data of district-level household surveys (DLHS) held before (2002-04), during (2007-08), and after (2012-13) the implementation of NRHM has been used. Geographical, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in maternal and child health were assessed by estimating the absolute differences in MCH indicators between urban and rural areas, between the most advantaged and least advantaged socioeconomic groups and between male and female children. Logistic regression analyses were done to observe significant differences in these inequalities between 2005 and 2012. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in all MCH indicators (p<0.05). The geographical and socioeconomic differences between urban and rural areas, and between rich and poor were significantly (p<0.05) reduced for pregnant women who had an institutional delivery (geographical difference declining from 22% to 7.6%; socioeconomic from 48.2% to 13%), post-natal care within 2 weeks of delivery (2.8% to 1.5%; 30.3% to 7%); and for children with full vaccination (10% to 3.5%, 48.3% to 14%) and who received oral rehydration solution (ORS) for diarrhea (11% to -2.2%; 41% to 5%). Inequalities between male and female children were significantly (p<0.05) reversed for full immunization (5.7% to -0.6%) and BCG immunization (1.9 to -0.9 points), and a significant (p<0.05) decrease was observed for oral polio vaccine (4.0% to 0%) and measles vaccine (4.2% to 0.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The implemented multiple-strategy community intervention National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) between 2005 and 2012 might have resulted in significant reductions in geographical, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in MCH in Haryana, as causal relationships cannot be established with descriptive research.


Assuntos
Saúde da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Família , Feminino , Identidade de Gênero , Geografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Índia , Lactente , Masculino , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacina Antipólio Oral/imunologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26668766

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Vaccine effectiveness analysis serves as a critical evaluation for immunization programmes and vaccination coverage. It also contributes to maintaining public confidence with the vaccine providers. This study estimated measles vaccine effectiveness at the population level using Australian national notifications data between 2006 and 2012. METHODS: Notification data were obtained from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Vaccination status was classified according to whether a case had received zero, one or two doses of measles-containing vaccine. Cases aged less than 1 year and those with unknown vaccination status were excluded. All children with disease onset between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2012 who were born after 1996 were included. Cases were matched to controls extracted from the Australian Childhood Immunization Register according to date of birth and jurisdiction of residence. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated by conditional logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test data robustness. RESULTS: Vaccine effectiveness was estimated at 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.5-98.0%) for one dose and 99.7% (95% CI: 99.2-99.9%) for two doses of measles vaccine. For at least one dose, effectiveness was estimated at 98.7% (95% CI: 97.9-99.2%). Sensitivity analyses did not significantly alter the base estimates. DISCUSSION: Vaccine effectiveness estimates suggested that the measles vaccine was protective at the population level between 2006 and 2012. However, vaccination coverage gaps may have contributed to recent measles outbreaks and may represent a serious barrier for Australia to maintain measles elimination status.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Austrália/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Vigilância da População , Fatores de Risco
18.
Euro Surveill ; 20(16)2015 Apr 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25953272

RESUMO

In accordance with the goal of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, the Italian national measles and rubella elimination plan aims to reduce the incidence of congenital rubella cases to less than one case per 100,000 live births by the end of 2015. We report national surveillance data for congenital rubella and rubella in pregnancy from 2005 to 2013. A total of 75 congenital rubella infections were reported; the national annual mean incidence was 1.5/100,000 live births, including probable and confirmed cases according to European Union case definition. Two peaks occurred in 2008 and 2012 (5.0 and 3.6/100,000 respectively). Overall, 160 rubella infections in pregnancy were reported; 69/148 women were multiparous and 38/126 had had a rubella antibody test before pregnancy. Among reported cases, there were 62 infected newborns, 31 voluntary abortions, one stillbirth and one spontaneous abortion. A total of 24 newborns were unclassified and 14 women were lost to follow-up, so underestimation is likely. To improve follow-up of cases, systematic procedures for monitoring infected mothers and children were introduced in 2013. To prevent congenital rubella, antibody screening before pregnancy and vaccination of susceptible women, including post-partum and post-abortum vaccination, should be promoted. Population coverage of two doses of measles-mumps-rubella vaccination of ≥ 95% should be maintained and knowledge of health professionals improved.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/epidemiologia , Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Feminino , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Vigilância da População , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez , Saúde Pública , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/classificação , Vacina contra Rubéola/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 10(7): 1773-7, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25424781

RESUMO

While a PhD candidate, doing my thesis at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Biology Division under Dr. Charles Congdon, my introduction to the immune response was studying graft vs. host (GVH) disease as a consequence of bone marrow transplantation in mice. The sequalae of GVH was impressive, and demonstrated the potential of negative clinical consequences of the immune system. The idea of harnessing this immunological phenomena in cancer therapy was appealing even in the late 1960s. The problem was that at the time T-cells as a component of the immune system were identified but not defined. We moved to soluble antigen stimulation in mice and recognized and described the post antigen stimulation changes in lymphatic tissue germinal centers during the first 48 h after the induction of the humoral immune response. We described the extracellular localization of soluble antigens on the surface of dendritic reticular cells of the stroma, directing a response of B-cells to produce antibody against non-self. The ensuing reaction was the rapid proliferation of B-cells toward antibody secreting plasma cells.


Assuntos
Cólera/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Programas de Imunização/economia , Neoplasias/terapia , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/métodos , Transtorno Autístico/induzido quimicamente , Vacinas Anticâncer/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Anticâncer/imunologia , Financiamento de Capital , Vacinas contra Cólera/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Cólera/imunologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Clostridioides difficile/imunologia , Simulação por Computador , Guiné , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinação/economia
20.
PLoS One ; 8(2): e55682, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23437059

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since 1995, measles vaccination at nine and 18 months has been routine in South Africa; however, coverage seldom reached >95%. We describe the epidemiology of laboratory-confirmed measles case-patients and assess the impact of the nationwide mass vaccination campaign during the 2009 to 2011 measles outbreak in South Africa. METHODS: Serum specimens collected from patients with suspected-measles were tested for measles-specific IgM antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and genotypes of a subset were determined. To estimate the impact of the nationwide mass vaccination campaign, we compared incidence in the seven months pre- (1 September 2009-11 April 2010) and seven months post-vaccination campaign (24 May 2010-31 December 2010) periods in seven provinces of South Africa. RESULTS: A total of 18,431 laboratory-confirmed measles case-patients were reported from all nine provinces of South Africa (cumulative incidence 37 per 100,000 population). The highest cumulative incidence per 100,000 population was in children aged <1 year (603), distributed as follows: <6 months (302/100,000), 6 to 8 months (1083/100,000) and 9 to 11 months (724/100,000). Forty eight percent of case-patients were ≥ 5 years (cumulative incidence 54/100,000). Cumulative incidence decreased with increasing age to 2/100,000 in persons ≥ 40 years. A single strain of measles virus (genotype B3) circulated throughout the outbreak. Prior to the vaccination campaign, cumulative incidence in the targeted vs. non-targeted age group was 5.9-fold higher, decreasing to 1.7 fold following the campaign (P<0.001) and an estimated 1,380 laboratory-confirmed measles case-patients were prevented. CONCLUSION: We observed a reduction in measles incidence following the nationwide mass vaccination campaign even though it was conducted approximately one year after the outbreak started. A booster dose at school entry may be of value given the high incidence in persons >5 years.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/imunologia , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Sarampo/genética , Sarampo/imunologia , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/imunologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA