"No jab, no pay": catch-up vaccination activity during its first two years.

OBJECTIVES: To assess catch-up vaccination of older children and adolescents during the first two years of the "No jab, no pay" policy linking eligibility for federal family assistance payments with childhood vaccination status. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional analysis of Australian Immunisation Register data on catch-up vaccination of children aged 5 to less than 7 years before (January 2013 - December 2014; baseline) and during the first two years of "No jab, no pay" (December 2015 - December 2017), and of children aged 7 to less than 10 years and young people aged 10 to less than 20 years ("No jab, no pay" period only). MAIN OUTCOMES: Catch-up vaccination rates for measles-mumps-rubella vaccine second dose (MMR2), by age group, Indigenous status, and socio-economic status; catch-up vaccination of children aged 5 to less than 7 years (third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine [DTPa3], MMR1), before and after introduction of "No jab, no pay". RESULTS: The proportion of incompletely vaccinated children aged 5 to less than 7 years who received catch-up DTPa3 was higher under "No jab, no pay" than during the baseline period (15.5% v 9.4%). Of 407 332 incompletely vaccinated people aged 10 to less than 20 years, 71 502 (17.6%) received catch-up MMR2 during the first two years of "No jab, no pay", increasing overall coverage for this age group from 86.6% to 89.0%. MMR2 catch-up activity in this age group was greater in the lowest socio-economic status areas than in the highest status areas (29.1% v 7.6%), and also for Indigenous than for non-Indigenous Australians (35.8% v 17.1%). MMR2 catch-up activity in 2016 and 2017 peaked mid-year. CONCLUSIONS: Linking family assistance payments with childhood vaccination status and associated program improvements were followed by substantial catch-up vaccination activity, particularly in young people from families of lower socio-economic status.

Health Departments' Experience With Mumps Outbreak Response and Use of a Third Dose of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine.

CONTEXT: During January 2016 to June 2017, US health departments (HDs) reported 150 mumps outbreaks. Most occurred among populations with high 2-dose measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage, prompting the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to examine the evidence for use of a third dose of MMR vaccine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HD experiences with mumps outbreak control and use of a third MMR dose during outbreaks. DESIGN: An online survey assessing mumps outbreak characteristics, outbreak response measures, challenges, and lessons learned from previous outbreaks was distributed to all 81 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists member HDs in August 2017. RESULTS: Sixty-one (75%) HDs responded; 46 (75%) had experience with ≥1 mumps outbreak(s) during January 2016 to August 2017. Twenty (43%) HDs recommended a third or outbreak MMR dose during mumps outbreaks; of these, 19 completed the section on use of a third dose and 8 (40%) rated the intervention "somewhat effective" or better. Health departments that used a third/outbreak dose suggested implementing the recommendation early and to a targeted group. Forty-three (73%) HDs reported having a policy for excluding persons without presumptive immunity from outbreak settings; of these, 37 (86%) had some degree of legal authority to implement this policy. Exclusion compliance improved with the use of personalized notification letters, focus groups of excluded persons and the community, and standardized messaging. Other outbreak control measures included cohorting of exposed or susceptible persons, mobile vaccination clinics and home visits, contact monitoring via text messaging, and facilitating student isolation with meal delivery and excused class absences. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed heterogeneity across HDs' mumps outbreak responses but also identified common challenges that will inform future Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance. These results were considered in the October 2017 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendation for use of a third dose of MMR vaccine for persons at increased risk for mumps during an outbreak and in the development of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance for HDs when applying the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendation.

Frequency and cost of live vaccines administered too soon after prior live vaccine in children aged 12 months through 6 years, 2014-2017.

OBJECTIVE: To identify number of children who received live vaccines outside recommended intervals between doses and calculate corrective revaccination costs. METHODS: We analyzed >1.6 million vaccination records for children aged 12 months through 6 years from six immunization information system (IIS) Sentinel Sites from 2014-15 when live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV, FluMist® Quadrivalent) was recommended for use, and from 2016-17, when not recommended for use. Depending on the vaccine, insufficient intervals between live vaccine doses are less than 24 or 28 days from a preceding live vaccine dose. Private and public purchase costs of vaccines were used to determine revaccination costs of live vaccine doses administered during the live vaccine conflict interval. Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR), varicella, combined MMRV, and LAIV were live vaccines evaluated in this study. RESULTS: Among 946,659 children who received at least one live vaccine dose from 2014-15, 4,873 (0.5%) received at least one dose too soon after a prior live vaccine (revaccination cost, $786,413) with a median conflict interval of 16 days. Among 704,591 children who received at least one live vaccine dose from 2016-17, 1,001 (0.1%) received at least one dose too soon after a prior live vaccine (revaccination cost, $181,565) with a median conflict interval of 14 days. The live vaccine most frequently administered outside of the recommended intervals was LAIV from 2014-15, and varicella from 2016-17. CONCLUSIONS: Live vaccine interval errors were rare (0.5%), indicating an adherence to recommendations. If all invalid doses were corrected by revaccination over the two time periods, the cost within the IIS Sentinel Sites would be nearly one million dollars. Provider awareness about live vaccine conflicts, especially with LAIV, could prevent errors, and utilization of clinical decision support functionality within IISs and Electronic Health Record Systems can facilitate better vaccination practices.

Cost-effectiveness of measles treatment: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Measles is still common in many developing countries, and its outbreaks have been on the rise since 2009 even though the disease is almost entirely preventable through safe and effective vaccination. This paper aims to provide evidence about the systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of measles treatment in different regions worldwide. METHODS: The methodical search began on 10th January 2019 to look for all articles on the cost-effectiveness of measles treatment published from January 2019 to April 2019 in SCOPUS, Pubmed (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Cochrane (www.cochrane.org).We summarised the articles by using a data table to extract all information using health economic evaluation methods. RESULTS: We identified 14 articles from the 69 total articles searched. These articles showed favourable costeffectiveness or cost-benefit ratios in high- and middle-income countries based on data organised by World Bank Income Level in 2018: the United States, Canada, Japan, India and Zambia. However, research is still limited in lowincome countries and thus the effectiveness of vaccination programmes cannot be conclusively identified. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows the overview of the research in health economic evaluations of measles in different places, years and using different methods of intervention. Overall, it evaluates the cost-effectiveness of measles treatment.

Chickenpox: An update.

Despite its benign characteristics, chickenpox is a childhood disease responsible for complications and deaths, particularly in the high-risk population. VariZIG®, not commercialized in France, is a good alternative for seronegative individuals exposed to the virus and not eligible for vaccination. The efficacy of routine vaccination has been demonstrated with a decrease in chickenpox incidence and with the development of herd immunity. Over time, the protective antibody titer of vaccinated people decreases and can be maintained by two doses of the vaccine. A tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-chickenpox vaccine, used in the United States, has a good tolerability in spite of the occurrence of fever and febrile seizures. Routine vaccination would contribute to make savings in France, by reducing direct and indirect costs of chickenpox.

Vaccination Policies: Requirements and Exemptions for Entering School.

(1) According to the World Health Organization, immunization prevents between 2 million to 3 million deaths every year across the world. (2) When immunization rates are high, herd immunity develops and limits the spread of the disease, which helps protect those who cannot be vaccinated. (3) Vaccination rates for measles, mumps and rubella vary across the United States, ranging from 85.6 percent in Washington, D.C., to 99.4 percent in Mississippi.

Economic Costs of Measles Outbreak in the Netherlands, 2013-2014.

In 2013 and 2014, the Netherlands experienced a measles outbreak in orthodox Protestant communities with low measles-mumps-rubella vaccination coverage. Assessing total outbreak costs is needed for public health outbreak preparedness and control. Total costs of this outbreak were an estimated $4.7 million.

High need for MMR vaccination in HIV infected adults in Austria.

Current guidelines recommend screening for HIV infected patients susceptible for vaccine preventable diseases and offering of immunization. However, data regarding the vaccination coverage among this group are largely missing. This study analyzed the serostatus for Measles, Mumps and Rubella of more than 700 HIV infected patients residing in Austria. These patients were representative for the Austrian HIV cohort regarding sex, age, transmission risk and HIV progression markers. 73.6% were on suppressive HAART, mean CD4 cell count was 603c/µl. Seronegativity was 8.4% for Measles, 33.4% for Mumps and 18.8% for Rubella. In total, out of the 713 HIV infected adults analyzed, almost half (47.8%) would require MMR vaccination. In a multivariate analysis migration was significantly associated with seronegativity for Measles (OR 0.5, CI 0.27-0.9) and Mumps (OR 0.57, CI 0.39-0.81). Importantly due to the well preserved immune status of nearly all participants vaccination would be feasible in the majority of the seronegative patients. Thus, a proactive approach would largely reduce the number of patients at risk for vaccine-preventable diseases.

Is the current prevention strategy based on vaccination coverage and epidemiological surveillance sufficient to achieve measles and rubella elimination in Europe?

Elimination of measles and rubella in Europe is a feasible objective, but it requires achieving a maintaining a high prevalence of protected individuals in order to prevent cases and outbreaks from imported cases. The epidemiology of measles and rubella in Europe in the period 2003-2013 suggests that we are far away from the elimination target for measles, while the situation is better for rubella. In this situation, a new preventive strategy based on serological surveillance systems should be developed in Europe in order to identify and immunise individuals in population groups without sufficient herd immunity against measles and rubella.

Persistence in epidemic metapopulations: quantifying the rescue effects for measles, mumps, rubella and whooping cough.

Metapopulation rescue effects are thought to be key to the persistence of many acute immunizing infections. Yet the enhancement of persistence through spatial coupling has not been previously quantified. Here we estimate the metapopulation rescue effects for four childhood infections using global WHO reported incidence data by comparing persistence on island countries vs all other countries, while controlling for key variables such as vaccine cover, birth rates and economic development. The relative risk of extinction on islands is significantly higher, and approximately double the risk of extinction in mainland countries. Furthermore, as may be expected, infections with longer infectious periods tend to have the strongest metapopulation rescue effects. Our results quantitate the notion that demography and local community size controls disease persistence.

Vacina Tetraviral (varicela, sarampo, caxumba e rubéola) / Tetraviral vaccine (chickenpox, measles, mumps and rubella)

A infecção pelo vírus varicela-zoster (VVZ) se manifesta por meio de dois quadros clínicos distintos: a infecção primária se manifesta como varicela, após a qual o vírus estabelece latência nos gânglios nervosos da raiz dorsal. Muitos anos após a infecção primária, pode ocorrer a reativação do VVZ, que se manifesta como herpes-zoster. Apenas um sorotipo de VVZ é conhecido e humanos são os únicos reservatórios do vírus, sendo possível o controle da infecção em uma população através de imunização ativa, muito embora o estabelecimento de latência viral e a possibilidade de reativação e transmissão do VVZ a partir de um caso de zoster tornem necessárias a manutenção da vigilância e altas coberturas vacinais enquanto existirem indivíduos com infecção latente pelo vírus selvagem. Abordar de forma adequada as formas complexas de manifestação clínica da infecção pelo VVZ na perspectiva populacional tem se constituído em desafio para os estudos de custo-efetividade da vacina contra varicela. A varicela é doença comum da infância e tem distribuição universal. A grande maioria dos casos ocorre em menores de 15 anos de idade e praticamente todos os adultos já foram infectados por VVZ. A doença apresenta distribuição sazonal, com a maioria dos casos ocorrendo no final do inverno e início da primavera (de julho a novembro, no Brasil). Picos epidêmicos têm sido observados a cada três a cinco anos. O tratamento clínico, na maioria dos casos, se resume ao uso de medicação sintomática, anti-térmicos, anti-sépticos e anti-pruriginosos. Nos casos com infecção bacteriana secundária recomenda-se o uso de antibióticos por via oral, observando-se, na prática clínica habitual nos serviços de saúde, uma variabilidade nas drogas prescritas, com reflexos importantes nos custos do tratamento. A vacinação contra a varicela não está contemplada nos calendários básicos de vacinação (criança, adolescente, adulto e idoso) no Brasil, exceto para situações excepcionais, nas quais se disponibiliza a vacina para grupos com riscos específicos. Apesar desta estratégia cumprir importante papel na proteção individual de pessoas mais vulneráveis, o impacto desta ação é inexistente à proteção da coletividade. Em 2013, com o intuito de ampliar esta proteção, o Ministério da Saúde (MS) pretende incluir as vacinas de varicela e hepatite A no calendário básico de vacinação da criança. Para que ocorra a introdução destas novas vacinas é necessário levar em consideração aspectos importantes como a redução dos custos dos imunobiológicos, logística operacional (armazenamento, transporte, seringas e agulhas), eficácia dos insumos além do custo-benefício desses produtos. Portanto, estudos de avaliação econômica em saúde têm apoiado diretamente a tomada de decisão, demonstrando transparência, perspectivas econômicas e epidemiológicas, promovendo assim a eficiência e equidade. Obedecendo a tais prerrogativas. Foram encomendados e apresentados os estudos de custo-efetividade das vacinas de varicela e hepatite A. Faz-se necessário, também, considerar que com as recentes introduções de novas vacinas nos calendários de vacinação do PNI, a rede de frio encontra-se no seu limite da capacidade instalada, em todos os níveis, de modo que há a necessidade de uma avaliação e readequação dessa rede. A vacina de varicela será introduzida no calendário básico de vacinação, para a população de 1 ano de idade, a partir do uso da vacina combinada tetraviral (sarampo, caxumba, rubéola e varicela), substituindo, portanto, o uso da vacina tríplice viral (sarampo, caxumba e rubéola) nesta população. Os membros da CONITEC presentes na 8ª reunião do plenário do dia 06/09/2012, por unanimidade, ratificaram a decisão de recomendar a incorporação da vacina tetraviral na rotina do Programa Nacional de Imunização. A Portaria CTIE-MS N.º 4 de 18 de janeiro de 2013 - Torna pública a decisão de incorporar a vacina tetraviral (varicela, sarampo, caxumba e rubéola) na rotina do Programa Nacional de Imunização do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS).

The burden and impact of measles among the Gypsy-Traveller communities, Thames Valley, 2006-09.

BACKGROUND: Outbreaks of measles in Gypsy-Traveller communities are well recognized. Their contribution to the overall burden of disease is less clear. METHODS: Measles case-management information was collated retrospectively for the Thames Valley population comprising 2.2 million people over the 4-year period from 2006 to 09. Suspected cases notified by general practitioners and hospital clinicians were sent a saliva testing kit. Cases were defined as those whose measles IgM was positive. Risk factor information was collected and collated including vaccination and membership of the Gypsy-Traveller communities. RESULTS: Of 142 cases of laboratory confirmed measles, 63% were in Gypsy-Traveller communities. These included 10 family clusters and outbreaks confined to the Gypsy-Traveller communities and one with a wider spread. The pattern was consistent across the 4 years studied. Among the Gypsy-Traveller communities 27 of 55 cases eligible for measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination had received one MMR vaccination. Overall seven cases were admitted to hospital with either pneumonia or dehydration. CONCLUSION: These findings showed a more than 100-fold higher incidence in the Gypsy-Traveller communities than the rest of the population. The high burden of disease in the Gypsy-Traveller communities highlights the importance of targeting immunization resources towards these communities.

Epidemiological designs for vaccine safety assessment: methods and pitfalls.

Three commonly used designs for vaccine safety assessment post licensure are cohort, case-control and self-controlled case series. These methods are often used with routine health databases and immunisation registries. This paper considers the issues that may arise when designing an epidemiological study, such as understanding the vaccine safety question, case definition and finding, limitations of data sources, uncontrolled confounding, and pitfalls that apply to the individual designs. The example of MMR and autism, where all three designs have been used, is presented to help consider these issues.

Prevalence of IgG antibody against measles, mumps and rubella in bangladeshi children: a pilot study to evaluate the need for integrated vaccination strategy.

The present study was carried out to determine the seroprevalence of IgG antibodies in Bangladeshi children against measles (irrespective of vaccination status), mumps and rubella (MMR) to assess strategic need of combined vaccination for these diseases. A total of 456 children of 1 month to 15 years, were studied. Serum IgG antibodies against MMR were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). By 3 months, protective IgG antibody level (>40 AU for measles and mumps and >15 IU/ml for rubella) for the diseases found to be between 50% and 80% among the studied children. Protective measles antibody (IgG) was not detected in all the children of 3-9 months and significant number of children between 9 months and 5 years were unprotected (87-65%; P < 0.001). Moreover, children of 3-15 months had no protective antibody level against mumps and significant number of children between 15 months and 5 years were unprotected (92-71%; P < 0.001). Between 5 and 15 years of age, significant number of children became protective (63-85%, P < 0.001). Although, a majority of children between 3 months and 5 years had shown to have no protective antibody against rubella (89-71%; P < 0.01-0.001) between >10 and 15 years 71% children had protective level of antibodies (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in antibody prevalence regarding socioeconomic classes, nutritional status and parental education. The data showed that: (i) a significant number of children remain unprotected against MMR in childhood and (ii) an extensive nationwide survey is required to suggest an integrated vaccination strategy in order to implement appropriate control measures of the three infectious diseases.

Factors underlying suboptimal childhood immunisation.

This review considers possible reasons behind parents' missed vaccination opportunities in the context of the latest immunisation coverage rates for England. Suboptimal uptake is not exclusive to measles, mumps and rubella (MMR). A substantial proportion of children also miss diphtheria, tetanus and polio vaccination. For MMR and diphtheria, tetanus and polio, uptake of primary plus booster immunisation is lower than for the primary course alone. Several reasons for suboptimal uptake are identified from the international literature. These provide insights into parental decision-making and potential barriers to immunisation that may need to be addressed in efforts to improve coverage rates.

The impact of a school entry law on adolescent immunization rates.

PURPOSE: Middle school entry laws increase coverage with recommended vaccines, but their effect on vaccines that are not required is unknown. We compared vaccination coverage for hepatitis B, tetanus and diphtheria (Td), and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) in areas of states with discordant middle school, hepatitis B school entry laws, and evaluated the relationship between demographic characteristics and adolescent immunization rates. METHODS: Retrospective design with purposive school sampling, using location of residence to determine study group. In each school, immunization records from a random sample of up to 75 students in ninth grade (affected by a new hepatitis B law) and 12th grade (not affected by the law) from 11 schools in two areas discordant for the law were analyzed. All areas had long standing two-dose MMR and Td requirements. RESULTS: Ninth graders in schools with the law had hepatitis B rates higher (72.8%) than those without the law (18.6%) (U = 2.0, p < .01). There were no significant differences between grades or schools for MMR and Td. However, even in the presence of the law, rates were significantly lower in schools with lower socioeconomic indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Middle school immunization laws are effective at raising adolescent hepatitis B, but in this study there wasn't enough power to discern the effect on rates for other vaccines or the influence of demographic variables on rates. Results suggested that laws did not appear to completely overcome disparities. For school mandates to be more effective, additional efforts, presumably on enforcement, especially in areas with lower socioeconomic indicators, are needed.

Timeliness of MMR vaccination--influence on vaccination coverage.

Over the last seven years, and especially in 2001, a declining coverage for MMR vaccination in 2-year-olds has been noted in Sweden. By recording actual date of vaccination in a cohort of almost 4,000 children in a county in central Sweden, we found that parents' decision to postpone vaccination by up to 1.5 years beyond the stipulated age of 18 months accounted for about half the reported drop in 2001. Even if coverage thus improves with time, postponed vaccination adds to the pool of unprotected children in the population. The design of the current national surveillance system overestimates coverage at 2 years and fails to record delayed vaccination. To avoid future outbreaks that can appear around imported cases of measles it is crucial to attain high coverage levels by timely vaccination.