RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors and outcomes of vasoplegia after cardiac surgery based on our experience with almost 2000 cardiac operations performed at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) between 2011 and 2013. Data were available for a total of 1992 patients. We defined vasoplegia as hypotension with persistently low systemic vascular resistance (<800 dyn/s/cm) and preserved Cardiac Index (>2.5). RESULTS: The rate of vasoplegia in our cohort was 20.3% (n = 405). The incidences of mild, moderate, and severe vasoplegia were 13.2, 5.7, and 1.5%, respectively. Factors that increased risk of vasoplegia included valve operations, heart transplants, dialysis-dependent renal failure, age >65, diuretic therapy, and recent myocardial infarction. B blocker therapy was protective against vasoplegia. CONCLUSION: Vasoplegic syndrome is still a frequently occurring adverse event following cardiac surgery. In high risk patients for vasoplegia, it may be sensible to proceed with preoperative volume loading (instead of diuresis), initiation of low dose vasopressin therapy if needed, and attempting to up titrate beta-blocker therapy.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Cardiopatias/cirurgia , Medição de Risco , Resistência Vascular/fisiologia , Vasoplegia/epidemiologia , Idoso , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Causas de Morte/tendências , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vasoplegia/etiologia , Vasoplegia/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Loco-regional anesthesia, along with the neurosensitive inhibition causes arterial and venous vasodilatation, that could be of interest for vascular access surgery. We evaluated the long term vasoplegia persistence after brachial plexic block. METHODS: Five patients submitted to brachial plexus block for an orthopedic procedure have been observed. Both radial arteries, that of the blocked arm and the opposite as a control, were analyzed by ultrasound examination, at time 0 and 360 minutes after anesthesia induction. All patients were treated with the same anesthesiologic protocol: axillary approach, use of an electroneurostimulator, injection 10 ml of ropivacain 7.5% + 10 ml of mepivacain 2%. The parameters evaluated from the arterial ultrasound flowmetry were: peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV) and resistance index (RI). RESULTS: No modification of the arterial flow were observed in the control arm at 0 and 360'after block induction. The blocked arm instead showed a significant decrease of the resistive index, stable at 360 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The vasoplegia accompaning plexic block lasted 6 hours after anesthesia induction. Whereas this longstanding haemodynamic effect is beneficial for early patency of vascular access for hemodialysis, needs to be ascertained by further investigations.