Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
World Neurosurg ; 189: 220-227, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38871285

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous findings from a clinical trial demonstrated noninferiority of Leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) compared to commercially available fibrin sealants in preventing postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage, necessitating intervention. This cost-effectiveness evaluation aims to assess the value-for-money of both techniques for dural closure in supratentorial and infratentorial surgeries. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness was estimated from a health care payer's perspective alongside a randomized clinical trial comprising 328 patients. The analysis focused on clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes, as well as direct medical costs including inpatient costs, imaging and laboratory costs, and outpatient follow up costs up to twelve weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Clinical and health-related quality of life data showed no significant differences between L-PRF (EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire 0.75 ± 0.25, 36-item Short Form Survey 63.93% ± 20.42) and control (EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire 0.72 ± 0.22, 36-item Short Form Survey 60.93% ± 20.78) groups. Pharmaceutical expenses during initial hospitalization were significantly lower in the L-PRF group (€190.4, interquartile range 149.9) than in the control group (€394.4, interquartile range 364.3), while other cost categories did not show any significant differences, resulting in an average cost advantage of €204 per patient favoring L-PRF. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates L-PRF as a cost-effective alternative for commercially available fibrin sealants in dural closure. Implementing L-PRF can lead to substantial cost savings, particularly considering the frequency of these procedures.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina , Fibrina Rica em Plaquetas , Humanos , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/economia , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Leucócitos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Idoso , Adulto , Qualidade de Vida , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/prevenção & controle , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Craniotomia/economia , Craniotomia/métodos
2.
J Comp Eff Res ; 13(4): e230047, 2024 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38389409

RESUMO

Aim: Posterior cranial fossa (PCF) surgery is associated with complications, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Dural sealants such as polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogels and fibrin glue can prevent CSF leaks, with evidence suggesting PEG hydrogels may outperform fibrin glue. However, the budget impact of using PEG hydrogels in PCF surgeries in Europe is unclear. Materials & methods: A decision tree was developed based on a previous US model, to assess the budget impact of switching from fibrin glue to PEG hydrogel in PCF surgery across five European countries. Input costs were derived from published sources for the financial year 2022/2023. Health outcomes, including CSF leaks, were considered. Results: The model predicted that using PEG hydrogel instead of fibrin glue in PCF surgery can lead to cost savings in five European countries. Cost savings per patient ranged from EUR 419 to EUR 1279, depending on the country. Sensitivity analysis showed that the incidence of CSF leaks and pseudomeningoceles had a substantial impact on the model's results. Conclusion: PEG hydrogels may be a cost-effective alternative to fibrin glue in PCF surgery. The model predicted that cost savings would be mainly driven by a reduction in the incidence of postoperative CSF leaks, resulting in reduced reliance on lumbar drains, reparative surgery and shortened hospital stays.


Assuntos
Rinorreia de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina , Humanos , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/prevenção & controle , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/etiologia , Rinorreia de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/etiologia , Rinorreia de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Hidrogéis
3.
World Neurosurg ; 180: 91-96, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37739172

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Collection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the subdural compartment is a major cause of postoperative morbidity, especially for posterior fossa surgeries. Arachnoid closure techniques, including suturing of the arachnoid and use of synthetic sealants, have been described in the literature. However, they are not always feasible or effective and have not been universally adopted. METHODS: We describe the technique of arachnoid welding for a case of brainstem cavernoma. This is a simple, cost-effective, and easily reproducible technique using readily available bipolar cautery kept at a low-current setting. At the end of surgery, the arachnoid leaflets are closely approximated, and bipolar cautery is used to seal the edges together. An illustrative video shows the technical nuances of this procedure. This technique can also be applied for arachnoid closure at other cranial and spinal sites. RESULTS: Arachnoid closure can act as an effective natural barrier to keep CSF in its physiological subarachnoid compartment. It provides an additional barrier to prevent CSF leak. It also prevents morbidity associated with adhesions and arachnoiditis. Proper closure of arachnoid makes durotomy during repeat surgery much easier and avoids injury to the underlying pia. A brief review of related literature shows the benefits of closing the arachnoid before dural closure and the different techniques that have been described so far. CONCLUSIONS: The arachnoid welding technique has a wide application, is easy to learn, and can be used especially for posterior fossa surgeries in which rates of CSF leak are the highest.


Assuntos
Soldagem , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/prevenção & controle , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/cirurgia , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/etiologia , Aracnoide-Máter/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Dura-Máter/cirurgia
4.
Animal Model Exp Med ; 6(1): 74-80, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36547216

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Liqoseal (Polyganics, B.V.) is a dural sealant patch for preventing postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. It has been extensively tested preclinically and CE (Conformité Européenne) approved for human use after a first cranial in-human study. However, the safety of Liqoseal for spinal application is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of spinal Liqoseal application compared with cranial application using histology and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics. METHODS: Eight female Dutch Landrace pigs underwent laminectomy, durotomy with standard suturing and Liqoseal application. Three control animals underwent the same procedure without sealant application. The histological characteristics and imaging characteristics of animals with similar survival times were compared to data from a previous cranial porcine model. RESULTS: Similar foreign body reactions were observed in spinal and cranial dura. The foreign body reaction consisted of neutrophils and reactive fibroblasts in the first 3 days, changing to a chronic granulomatous inflammatory reaction with an increasing number of macrophages and lymphocytes and the formation of a fibroblast layer on the dura by day 7. Mean Liqoseal plus dura thickness reached a maximum of 1.2 mm (range 0.7-2.0 mm) at day 7. CONCLUSION: The spinal dural histological reaction to Liqoseal during the first 7 days was similar to the cranial dural reaction. Liqoseal did not swell significantly in both application areas over time. Given the current lack of a safe and effective dural sealant for spinal application, we propose that an in-human safety study of Liqoseal is the logical next step.


Assuntos
Polietilenoglicóis , Coluna Vertebral , Humanos , Feminino , Animais , Suínos , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Laminectomia , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/prevenção & controle , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Inflamação/cirurgia
5.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 156(10): 1879-88, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25091535

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and headaches remain potential complications after retrosigmoid approaches for lesions in the posterior fossa and cerebellopontine angle. The authors describe a simple repair technique with an autologous fat graft-assisted Medpor Titan cranioplasty and investigate the incidence of postoperative CSF leaks and headaches using this technique. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all cases (n = 60) of retrosigmoid craniectomy from September 2009 to May 2014 in patients who underwent fat graft-assisted cranioplasty. After obtaining a watertight dural closure and sealing off any visible mastoid air cells with bone wax, an autologous fat graft was placed over the dural suture line and up against the waxed-off air cells. The fat graft filled the retrosigmoid cranial defect and was then bolstered with a Medpor Titan (titanium mesh embedded in porous polyethylene) cranioplasty. A postoperative mastoid pressure dressing was applied for 48 h, and prophylactic lumbar drainage was not used. Factors examined in this study included postoperative CSF leak (incisional, rhinorrhea, otorrhea), pseudomeningocele formation, incidence and severity of postoperative headache, length of hospital stay, and length of follow-up. RESULTS: No patients developed postoperative CSF leaks (0 %), pseudomeningoceles (0 %), or new-onset postoperative headaches (0 %) with the described repair technique. There were no cases of graft site morbidity such as hematoma or wound infection. Mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was 3.8 days (range 2-10 days). Mean postoperative follow-up was 12.4 months (range 2.0-41.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our multilayer repair technique with a fat graft-assisted Medpor Titan cranioplasty appears effective in preventing postoperative CSF leaks and new-onset postoperative headaches after retrosigmoid approaches. Postoperative lumbar drainage may not be necessary.


Assuntos
Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/prevenção & controle , Craniotomia/métodos , Cefaleia/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Adipócitos/transplante , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/etiologia , Craniotomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Cefaleia/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polietilenos/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Transplantes , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA