Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Neurosurg ; 37(4): 589-594, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34042010

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: An inter- and intra-observer agreement study. BACKGROUND: In recent years, vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have been widely used in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) though the clinical efficacy of them is still controversial. However, there are also inevitable complications, first and foremost is bone cement leakage (BCL). Yeom classification is commonly used to evaluate BCL. The objective of this study is to assess its reliability and reproducibility, and to explore its clinical application value. METHODS: All 58 patients with BCL following vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty were involved. Six spine surgeons were selected to be evaluators as they were unaware of the identity of the patients and the treatment they received. They classified BCL according to Yeom system, we used kappa (K) to assess the inter- and intra-observer agreement. After 12 weeks, we repeated the analysis. RESULTS: The inter-observer reliability of Yeom classification was substantial with K value of 0.71 (1st assessment) and 0.73 (2nd assessment). The intra-observer reproducibility of Yeom classification was near perfect with K value of 0.88. CONCLUSION: Yeom classification system has substantial inter-observer reliability and near perfect intra-observer reproducibility in BCL following vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty, which can be widely used in clinical care as an appropriate instrument for early observation, mechanism and severity cognition, and prognosis predicting of BCL. Besides, the adding of type M (the mixed type) may improve the classification.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão , Cifoplastia , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Vertebroplastia , Humanos , Cifoplastia/efeitos adversos , Cimentos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Skeletal Radiol ; 51(8): 1623-1630, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35122489

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Currently, the risk factors for subsequent fracture following vertebral augmentation remain incomplete and controversial. To provide clinicians with accurate information for developing a preventive strategy, we carried out a comprehensive evaluation of previously controversial and unexplored risk factors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in lumbar spine who received vertebral augmentation between January 2019 and December 2020. Based on whether refracture occurred, patients were assigned to refracture and non-refracture group. The clinical characteristics, imaging parameters (severity of vertebral compression, spinal sagittal alignment, degeneration of paraspinal muscles), and surgical indicators (cement distribution and leakage, correction of spinal sagittal alignment) were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: There were 128 patients and 16 patients in non-refracture and refracture group. The incidence of previous fracture, multiple fractures, and cement leakage were notably higher, relative cross-sectional area of psoas (r-CSAPS) was significantly smaller, CSA ratio, fatty infiltration of erector spinae plus multifidus (FIES+MF), FIPS, postoperative lumbar lordosis (post-LL), correction of body angel (BA), and LL were significantly greater in refracture group. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed previous fracture, cement leakage, post-LL, and correction of BA were independent risk factors. According to the ROC curve, correction of BA showed the highest prediction accuracy, and the critical value was 3.45°. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of subsequent fracture might be the consequence of multiple factors. Previous fracture, cement leakage, post-LL, and correction of BA were identified as independent risk factors. Furthermore, the correction of BA should not exceed 3.45°, especially in patients with risk factors.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão , Cifoplastia , Lordose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Vertebroplastia , Cimentos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Fraturas por Compressão/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Humanos , Cifoplastia/efeitos adversos , Cifoplastia/métodos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos , Vertebroplastia/métodos
4.
Eur Radiol ; 29(2): 663-673, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30054794

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for ICE during a PV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective analysis of 1512 consecutive patients who underwent 1854 PV procedures for osteoporotic (34 %), malignant (39.9 %) or other cause (26.1 %) of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs)/spine tumor lesions. Only thoracic or lumbar PVs were included. PVs were performed with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) low-viscosity bone cement under fluoroscopic guidance. Chest imaging (X-ray or CT) was performed the same day after PV in patients with high clinical suspicion of ICE. All post-procedural chest-imaging examinations were reviewed, and all ICEs were agreed upon in consensus by two radiologists. RESULTS: ICEs were detected in 72 patients (92 cement embolisms). In 86.1 % of the cases, concomitant pulmonary artery cement leakage was detected. Symptomatic ICEs were observed in six cases (8.3% of all ICEs; 0.32% of all PV procedures). No ICE led to death or permanent sequelae. Multiple levels treated during the same PV session were associated with a higher ICE rate [OR: 3.59, 95% CI: (1.98-6.51); p < 0.001]; the use of flat panel technology with a lower ICE occurrence [OR: 0.51, 95% CI: (0.32-0.83); p = 0.007]. CONCLUSION: Intracardiac cement embolism after PV has a low incidence (3.9 % in our study). Symptomatic complications related to ICE are rare (0.3%); none was responsible for clinical sequelae in our series. KEY POINTS: • The incidence of intracardiac cement embolism (ICE) during PVP is low (3.9%). • Having a high number of treated vertebrae during the same session is a significant risk factor for ICE. • Symptomatic intracardiac cement embolisms have a low incidence (8.3% of patients with ICE).


Assuntos
Cimentos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Embolia/etiologia , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Cardiopatias/etiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Embolia/diagnóstico por imagem , Extravasamento de Materiais Terapêuticos e Diagnósticos/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polimetil Metacrilato/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Radiografia , Radiografia Intervencionista , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Adulto Jovem
6.
Neurosurg Focus ; 44(5): E13, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29712521

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a well-recognized complication of surgery for adult spinal deformity and is characterized by increased kyphosis at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV). PJK prevention strategies have the potential to decrease morbidity and cost by reducing rates of proximal junctional failure (PJF), which the authors define as radiographic PJK plus clinical sequelae requiring revision surgery. METHODS The authors performed an analysis of 195 consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity. Age, sex, levels fused, upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), use of 3-column osteotomy, pelvic fixation, and mean time to follow-up were collected. The authors also reviewed operative reports to assess for the use of surgical adjuncts targeted toward PJK prevention, including ligament augmentation, hook fixation, and vertebroplasty. The cost of surgery, including direct and total costs, was also assessed at index surgery and revision surgery. Only revision surgery for PJF was included. RESULTS The mean age of the cohort was 64 years (range 25-84 years); 135 (69%) patients were female. The mean number of levels fused was 10 (range 2-18) with the UIV as follows: 2 cervical (1%), 73 upper thoracic (37%), 108 lower thoracic (55%), and 12 lumbar (6%). Ligament augmentation was used in 99 cases (51%), hook fixation in 60 cases (31%), and vertebroplasty in 71 cases (36%). PJF occurred in 18 cases (9%). Univariate analysis found that ligament augmentation and hook fixation were associated with decreased rates of PJF. However, in a multivariate model that also incorporated age, sex, and UIV, only ligament augmentation maintained a significant association with PJF reduction (OR 0.196, 95% CI 0.050-0.774; p = 0.020). Patients with ligament augmentation, compared with those without, had a higher cost of index surgery, but ligament augmentation was overall cost effective and produced significant cost savings. In sensitivity analyses in which we independently varied the reduction in PJF, cost of ligament augmentation, and cost of reoperation by ± 50%, ligament augmentation remained a cost-effective strategy for PJF prevention. CONCLUSIONS Prevention strategies for PJK/PJF are limited, and their cost-effectiveness has yet to be established. The authors present the results of 195 patients with adult spinal deformity and show that ligament augmentation is associated with significant reductions in PJF in both univariate and multivariate analyses, and that this intervention is cost-effective. Future studies will need to determine if these clinical results are reproducible, but for high-risk cases, these data suggest an important role of ligament augmentation for PJF prevention and cost savings.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Cifose/economia , Cifose/cirurgia , Ligamentos/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Reoperação/economia , Vertebroplastia/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Falha de Tratamento , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos
7.
Int Orthop ; 42(6): 1321-1326, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29445960

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty at a hyperextension position (PVPHP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty at a hyperextension position (PKPHP) for the treatment of osteoporotic Kümmell's disease. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, single-centre study. There were 35 patients with osteoporotic Kümmell's disease who were analyzed. Twenty-two of them underwent PVPHP and the other 13 patients underwent PKPHP from January 2013 to January 2015. The volume of bone cement injection and operation costs were compared. We compared the visual analogue score (VAS) and vertebral Cobb's angle at pre-operation, the second day after operation, and the final follow-up. We compared the Oswestry disability index (ODI) score at the pre-operation and the final follow-up. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in gender, age, course of disease, bone mineral density (BMD), and mean follow-up time between the two groups (P > 0.05). Regarding the costs of the operation, the PKPHP group was significantly higher than the PVPHP group (P < 0.05). Compared with the pre-operation (P < 0.05), the post-operative ODI score, VAS, and Cobb's angle of the two groups were improved significantly. Even though the correction of Cobb's angle in the PKPHP group was slightly better than the PVPHP position group, there were no significant differences between two groups (P > 0.05). At the final follow-up, the Cobb's angle was increased in both groups, but there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the bone cement leakage rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: For the treatment of Kümmell's disease, PVPHP and PKPHP are both safe and effective, but PVPHP is more economical and can be considered a preferred method of treatment.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos
8.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 42(13): 1024-1030, 2017 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27922573

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Analyze efficacy of vertebroplasty and its affect on return to work (RTW) in a workers' compensation (WC) population SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Vertebroplasty remains a controversial treatment modality for vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). No studies have analyzed use of vertebroplasty in the clinically distinct WC population. METHODS: A total of 371 Ohio WC subjects were identified who sustained VCFs and were treated with either vertebroplasty or conservative medical therapy between 1993 and 2013 using Current Procedural Terminology procedural and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes. Subjects with a prior smoking history, prior thoracolumbar surgery or comorbidities, or underwent decompression and/or fusion within 3 months after injury were excluded. Forty-six subjects had undergone vertebroplasty within 1 year of injury and were therefore included in the vertebroplasty group. The remaining 325 subjects received spinal orthosis and formed the control group. The primary outcomes were whether subjects returned to work at early and late time points. Early RTW was defined as returning to work within 3 months and remaining at work for more than 6 months of the following year. Late RTW was defined as returning to work within 2 years and remaining at work for more than 6 months of the following year. Secondary outcomes included opioid use, all-cause mortality, and additional VCFs. RESULTS: Approximately 37% (17/46) of vertebroplasty group made an early RTW, compared with 35.4% (115/325) of control group (P = 0.835). Regarding late RTW, only 54.3% (25/46) of vertebroplasty group made a sustainable RTW, compared with 70.8% (230/325) of subjects in control group (P = 0.025). In addition, the vertebroplasty group was associated with significantly higher postoperative opioid use. CONCLUSION: Vertebroplasty may not be an effective treatment modality for VCFs in the WC population when RTW is the primary goal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Retorno ao Trabalho/tendências , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Vertebroplastia/tendências , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/tendências , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/lesões , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Vértebras Torácicas/lesões , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos
9.
Spine J ; 16(10): 1263-1275, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27345746

RESUMO

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Large animal models are highly recommended for meaningful preclinical studies, including the optimization of cement augmentation for vertebral body defects by vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic characterization of a strictly minimally invasive in vivo large animal model for lumbar ventrolateral vertebroplasty. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: This is a prospective experimental animal study. METHODS: Lumbar defects (diameter 5 mm; depth approximately 14 mm) were created by a ventrolateral percutaneous approach in aged, osteopenic, female sheep (40 Merino sheep; 6-9 years; 68-110 kg). L1 remained untouched, L2 was left with an empty defect, and L3 carried a defect injected with a brushite-forming calcium phosphate cement (CPC). Trauma/functional impairment, surgical techniques (including drill sleeve and working canula with stop), reproducibility, bone defects, cement filling, and functional cement augmentation were documented by intraoperative incision-to-suture time and X-ray, postoperative trauma/impairment scores, and ex vivo osteodensitometry, microcomputed tomography (CT), histology, static/fluorescence histomorphometry, and biomechanical testing. RESULTS: Minimally invasive vertebroplasty resulted in short operation times (28±2 minutes; mean±standard error of the mean) and X-ray exposure (1.59±0.12 minutes), very limited local trauma (score 0.00±0.00 at 24 hours), short postoperative recovery (2.95±0.29 hours), and rapid decrease of the postoperative impairment score to 0 (3.28±0.36 hours). Reproducible defect creation and cement filling were documented by intraoperative X-ray and ex vivo conventional/micro-CT. Vertebral cement augmentation and osteoconductivity of the CPC was verified by osteodensitometry (CPC>control), micro-CT (CPC>control and empty defect), histology/static histomorphometry (CPC>control and empty defect), fluorescence histomorphometry (CPC>control; all p<.05 for 3 and 9 months), and compressive strength measurements (CPC numerically higher than control; 102% for 3 months and 110% for 9 months). CONCLUSIONS: This first-time systematic clinical assessment of a minimally invasive, ventrolateral, lumbar vertebroplasty model in aged, osteopenic sheep resulted in short operation times, rapid postoperative recovery, and high experimental reproducibility. This model represents an optimal basis for standardized evaluation of future studies on vertebral augmentation with resorbable and osteoconductive CPC.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Animais , Cimentos Ósseos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Ovinos , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos
10.
Adv Clin Exp Med ; 24(4): 651-6, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26469110

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In patients with multiple myeloma (MM) there is a high risk of compression fractures of the spine. In the majority of cases, the method of treatment is percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) or kyphoplasty (PK). The number of studies verifying their efficacy in MM is still relatively small. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study has been to assess medium- and long-term pain relief as well as improvement in the quality of life (QL) after PV in MM cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There was a prospective group of 34 MM cases in which a total of 131 vertebral bodies were augmented by means of PV. It was possible to follow up 22 patients who agreed to take part in the assessment. Their level of daily activity and the level of pain were assessed using the Oswestry Back Pain scale and a visual analogue scale (VAS) before PV and at a later date (medium-term follow up was a mean of 10 months after the last operation). Five out of eight cases in which 4.5-5 years had elapsed since the first PV were tested again (long-term follow-up). RESULTS: Relief of pain and improvement of QL, assessed a mean of 10 months after PV, proved to be statistically significant. On the average, pain decreased by 4.7 points as measured on the VAS scale and the average improvement in the QL measured on the Oswestry scale was 27.7%. There were no neurological or general complications. After 4.5-5 years, there has not been any significant change in the level of pain relief or the improvement in the QL in the 5 cases in which long-term assessment was possible. CONCLUSIONS: In MM cases, PV is a simple, effective and safe method for the treatment of vertebral infiltration and compression fractures, giving permanent long-term pain relief and concomitant improvement in the QL.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Fraturas Espontâneas/cirurgia , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Qualidade de Vida , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Idoso , Dor nas Costas/etiologia , Dor nas Costas/prevenção & controle , Dor nas Costas/psicologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Fraturas por Compressão/diagnóstico , Fraturas por Compressão/etiologia , Fraturas por Compressão/psicologia , Fraturas Espontâneas/diagnóstico , Fraturas Espontâneas/etiologia , Fraturas Espontâneas/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/psicologia , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos
11.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 472(5): 1597-604, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24338042

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies of the quality and accuracy of health and medical information available on the Internet have shown that many sources provide inadequate information. However, to our knowledge, there are no published studies analyzing the quality of information available online regarding vertebroplasty. Because this has been a high-volume procedure with highly debated efficacy, it is critical that patients receive complete, accurate, and well-balanced information before deciding a treatment course. Additionally, few studies have evaluated the merit of academic site authorship or site certification on information quality, but some studies have used measurements of quality that are based primarily on subjective criteria or information accuracy rather than information completeness. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of our study were (1) to evaluate and analyze the information on vertebroplasty available to the general public through the Internet; (2) to see if sites sponsored by academic institutions offered a higher quality of information; and (3) to determine whether quality of information varied according to site approval by a certification body. METHODS: Three search engines were used to identify 105 web sites (35 per engine) offering information regarding vertebroplasty. Sites were evaluated for authorship/sponsorship, content, and references cited. Information quality was rated as "excellent," "high," "moderate," "low," or "unacceptable." Sites also were evaluated for contact information to set up an appointment. Data were analyzed as a complete set, then compared between authorship types, and finally evaluated by certification status. Academic sites were compared with other authorship groups and certified sites were compared with noncertified sites using Student's t-test. RESULTS: Appropriate indications were referenced in 74% of sites, whereas only 45% discussed a contraindication to the procedure. Benefits were expressed by 100% of sites, but risks were outlined in only 53% (p < 0.001). Ninety-nine percent of sites provided step-by-step descriptions of the procedure, and 44% of sites also included images. Alternative treatments were mentioned by 51% of sites. Twenty-seven percent of sites referenced peer-reviewed literature, 41% offered experiential or noncited data based on American populations, and 7% offered analogous data from international populations. Thirty percent of sites provided contact information for patient appointment scheduling. Seven percent of sites were classified as excellent quality, 6% as high quality, 11% as moderate quality, 19% as poor quality, and 57% as unacceptable. Sixteen percent of sites were sponsored by academic institutions, 62% by private groups, 8% by biomedical device companies, and 14% were sponsored otherwise. Academic sites reported fewer risks of the procedure than private sites or other sites (p = 0.05 and p = 0.04), but reported more risks than industry sites (p = 0.007). Academic sites were more likely than sites classified as other to offer contact information for patient appointment scheduling (p = 0.004). Nine percent of sites evaluated were Health on the Net Foundation (HONCode) certified. No association with improved information quality was observed in these sites relative to noncertified sites (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Internet information regarding vertebroplasty is not only inadequate for proper patient education, but also potentially misleading as sites are more likely to present benefits of the procedure than risks. Although academic sites might be expected to offer higher-quality information than private, industry, or other sites, our data would suggest that they do not. HONCode certification cannot be used reliably as a means of qualifying website information quality. Academic sites should be expected to set a high standard and alter their Internet presence with adequate information distribution. Certification bodies also should alter their standards to necessitate provision of complete information in addition to emphasizing accurate information. Treating physicians may want to counsel their patients regarding the limitations of information present on the Internet and the pitfalls of current certification systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, economic and decision analyses. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Acesso à Informação , Sistemas de Informação em Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Internet , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Vertebroplastia/educação , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Autoria , Certificação , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Sistemas de Informação em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Internet/normas , Marketing de Serviços de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Setor Privado , Controle de Qualidade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos , Navegador
12.
Pain Physician ; 16(4): 309-20, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23877447

RESUMO

Although over 300 articles have been published annually on vertebral augmentation in the last 5 years, there remains much debate about a fundamental question - is vertebral augmentation a safe and effective treatment to achieve analgesia, reduce disability, and improve quality of life in patients with a vertebral fracture? In this modern era of evidence-based clinical practice and public health care policy and funding, an evidentiary basis is needed to continue to perform vertebral augmentation. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the latest and highest quality evidence for efficacy, safety, cost effectiveness, and potential survival benefit after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. The design, major inclusion criteria, primary outcome measures, relevant primary baseline characteristics, primary outcomes, relevant secondary outcomes, and limitations of prospective multicenter randomized sham-controlled and conservative management-controlled trials are summarized. Recently published meta-analyses or systematic reviews of efficacy that include these recent prospective studies of vertebral augmentation are examined. The highest quality procedural safety data relating to medical complications, cement leaks, and subsequent vertebral fracture are reviewed. Publications from national databases analyzing potential reduction in length of hospital stay and reduction in mortality after vertebral augmentation are presented. Finally, emerging literature assessing the potential cost-effectiveness of vertebral augmentation is considered. This narrative review will provide interventional pain physicians a summary of the latest and highest quality data published on vertebral augmentation. This will allow integration of the best available evidence with clinical expertise and patient wishes to make the most appropriate evidence-based clinical decisions for patients with symptomatic vertebral fracture.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão/economia , Cifoplastia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vertebroplastia , Cimentos Ósseos/economia , Cimentos Ósseos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Humanos , Cifoplastia/efeitos adversos , Cifoplastia/economia , Cifoplastia/métodos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos , Vertebroplastia/economia , Vertebroplastia/métodos
13.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 23(11): 1423-9, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23101914

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare cost and outcomes of surgical and percutaneous treatments of pathologic vertebral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard Medicare 5% anonymized inpatient files (1999-2009) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a diagnosis of vertebral fracture without spinal cord injury and primary or metastatic bony malignancy were divided into percutaneous or surgical groups based on whether they received vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty or surgical treatment. Patients who had no intervention or both interventions were excluded. Cost, length of stay, and type of discharge were examined while controlling for demographic and comorbidity variables. RESULTS: A total of 451 patients were included; 52% received percutaneous treatment and 48% received surgery. Patients treated percutaneously were older (P < .001) and more likely to be female (P = .04). Percutaneous therapy predicted $14,862 less Medicare cost and $13,565 less overall cost (P < .001 for both), and 4.1 fewer inpatient days (P < .001). Patients who underwent surgery had higher odds of death (odds ratio = 3.38, P = .016), discharge to a rehabilitation facility (odds ratio = 3.3, P = .003), and transfer to another inpatient facility (odds ratio = 8.53, P < .001), and lower odds of discharge to home (odds ratio = 0.42, P < .001) and hospice (odds ratio = 0.08, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: In a Medicare population with bony malignancy and vertebral fractures, percutaneous therapy predicted significantly reduced cost and length of stay versus surgery. Patients who underwent percutaneous therapy were significantly less likely to die, be transferred, or be discharged to rehabilitation facilities, and were more likely to be discharged to home or hospice.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/terapia , Fraturas Espontâneas/terapia , Cifoplastia , Medicare , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/terapia , Fusão Vertebral , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/complicações , Neoplasias Ósseas/economia , Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comorbidade , Feminino , Fraturas Espontâneas/economia , Fraturas Espontâneas/etiologia , Fraturas Espontâneas/mortalidade , Fraturas Espontâneas/cirurgia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Hospitais para Doentes Terminais , Humanos , Cifoplastia/efeitos adversos , Cifoplastia/economia , Cifoplastia/mortalidade , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Alta do Paciente , Transferência de Pacientes , Centros de Reabilitação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/economia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/mortalidade , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Fusão Vertebral/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos , Vertebroplastia/economia , Vertebroplastia/mortalidade
14.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 25(5): 577-83, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22914353

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cement bone augmentation has become very popular worldwide in treating painful noncomplicated spine fractures. Controversy about the effectiveness was raised by two randomized trials in 2009. Recent new evidence contradicts those findings giving credit to vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty. RECENT FINDINGS: Well designed prospective clinical trials in cancer and noncancer vertebral fractures as well as an excellent meta-analysis showed that painful vertebral compression fractures have better and faster pain relief, better functional outcomes, and with low complication rate when treated with percutaneous cement than conservatively. SUMMARY: The saga is unfinished. The treatment of vertebral compression fractures with cement augmentation is still in its infancy. The potential for development with new materials and the injection of biologic and active bone cements or anticancer products, in metastatic disease, will revolutionize the treatment of this condition.


Assuntos
Cifoplastia/métodos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Anestesia , Cimentos Ósseos , Contraindicações , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Cifoplastia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/complicações , Osteoporose/complicações , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos
15.
Age Ageing ; 41(4): 450-5, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22417981

RESUMO

Vertebral compression fractures are a common clinical problem and the incidence of them will increase with the ageing population. Traditionally management has been conservative; however, there has been a growing trend towards vertebroplasty as an alternative therapy in patients with persisting severe pain. NICE produced guidance in 2003 recommending the procedure after 4 weeks of conservative management. Recent high-quality studies have been contradictory and there is currently a debate surrounding the role of the procedure with no agreement in the literature. We examine the evidence in both osteoporotic and malignant vertebral compression fractures; we also describe the benefits and side effects, alternative treatment options and the cost of the procedure. Finally, we recommend when vertebroplasty is most appropriately used based on the best available evidence.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão/terapia , Osteoporose/complicações , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/terapia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Vertebroplastia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Fraturas por Compressão/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Compressão/economia , Fraturas por Compressão/etiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Radiografia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/economia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos , Vertebroplastia/economia , Vertebroplastia/normas
17.
Zhongguo Gu Shang ; 23(10): 734-8, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21137281

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effects and safety of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the senile osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. METHODS: From December 2004 to June 2008, 28 patients (40 vertebrae) with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP group), there were 11 males (14 vertebrae) and 17 females (26 vertebrae), with an average age of 72 years (ranged, 70 to 91 years). The fracture site of vertebral body was from T5 to L5. Other 31 patients (43 vertebrae) were treated with percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP group), there were 13 males (18 vertebrae) and 18 females (25 vertebrae), with an average age of 74 years (ranged, 70 to 92 years). The fracture site of vertebral body was from T4 to L5. Theapeutic effects of all the patients were observed after operation, the item included visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry score, Cobb angle, the height of anterior and middle column vertebra, and the incidence of cement leakage. RESULTS: There was significant decrease in VAS score and Oswestry score after operation in both groups, there was significant difference between preoperative and postoperative (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in VAS score and Oswestry score between two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in Cobb angles and the height of anterior and middle column vertebra between two groups before and after operation (P > 0.05). Among them, there were 3 vertebrae cement leakage in PVP group (7.5%) and 2 in PKP group (4.7%), but no clinical sympton occurred. There was no significant difference in the incidence of cement leakage between two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are safe and effective methods in treating senile osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, which can restore the height of fractured vertebra, relieve pain and improve function as well as minimize the incidence of cement leakage.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Cifoplastia/métodos , Osteoporose/cirurgia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cimentos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fraturas Espontâneas/cirurgia , Humanos , Cifoplastia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Coluna Vertebral , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos
19.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 30(2): 227-31, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19001542

RESUMO

SUMMARY: Percutaneous vertebroplasty has been deferred due to potential complications from urinary tract infections (UTIs). Our aim was to help sort out the types of treatment needed for percutaneous vertebroplasty patients and the length delay for performing the procedure. We searched for information regarding the ramifications of infection from the literature and devised a plan of treatment for the various infectious problems that may occur in patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty. We devised a plan of action for the screening, testing, diagnosis and treatment of patients with a potential UTI who are presenting for a percutaneous vertebroplasty.


Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/terapia , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/terapia , Humanos , Incidência , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA