Guided and unguided internet-based vestibular rehabilitation versus usual care for dizzy adults of 50†years and older: a protocol for a three-armed randomised trial.

INTRODUCTION: Dizziness is a common symptom in general practice with a high prevalence among older adults. The most common cause of dizziness in general practice is peripheral vestibular disease. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is a safe and effective treatment for peripheral vestibular disease that entails specific exercises to maximise the central nervous system compensation for the effects of vestibular pathology. An internet-based VR intervention has recently been shown to be safe and effective. Online interventions are low cost and easily accessible, but prone to attrition and non-adherence. A combination of online and face-to-face therapy, known as blended care, may balance these advantages and disadvantages. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-blind, three-arm, randomised controlled trial among patients aged 50 years and over presenting with dizziness of vestibular origin in general practice will be performed. In this study, we will compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of stand-alone internet-based VR and internet-based VR with physiotherapeutic support ('blended care') with usual care during 6 months of follow-up. We will use a translated Dutch version of a British online VR intervention. Randomisation will be stratified by dizziness severity. The primary outcome measure is the Vertigo Symptoms Scale-Short Form. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed, adjusting for confounders. The economic evaluation will be conducted from a societal perspective. We will perform an additional analysis on the data to identify predictors of successful treatment in the same population to develop a clinical decision rule for general practitioners. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ethical committee of the VU University Medical Center approved ethics and dissemination of the study protocol. The insights and results of this study will be widely disseminated through international peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pre-results, NTR5712.

Using core sets of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) to measure disability in vestibular disorders: study protocol.

Symptom frequency and severity in vestibular disorders often do not correlate well with patients' restrictions of activities of daily living and limitations of participation. Due to the lack of appropriate patient reported outcome measures (PRO), the extent of limitations and restrictions is mostly unknown. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is a conceptual framework and classification to evaluate all aspects of health and disability. An ICF-based measure, the Vestibular and Participation Measure (VAP), was recently proposed. Also, an ICF Core Set for vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders was developed to describe what aspects of functioning should be measured. This study protocol describes the development and cross-cultural validation of a new measure, the VAP-extended (VAP-e), based on VAP and ICF Core Set on three continents. To determine objectivity and cross-cultural validity of the VAP and to find potentially redundant items, Rasch models will be used. The VAP-e will be created by modifying or adding items from the Activities and Participation and Environmental Factors component of the ICF Core Set. Reliability, objectivity and responsiveness of the VAP-e will be tested.

The role of the vestibular assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of vestibular assessment in the management of the dizzy patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of case notes and vestibular assessment reports of 100 consecutive patients referred for vestibular assessment. RESULTS: Sixty of the 100 patients had an abnormal vestibular assessment. Eleven patients had benign paroxysmal positional vertigo as the sole diagnosis, of whom nine had not had a Dix-Hallpike manoeuvre performed before referral. Of patients referred for vestibular rehabilitation, 76 per cent had an abnormal electrophysiological assessment. After vestibular assessment, 35 patients were discharged with no further follow-up appointments in the ENT department. CONCLUSIONS: All patients should have a Dix-Hallpike manoeuvre performed prior to referral for vestibular assessment. The majority of our patients undergoing vestibular rehabilitation had abnormal test results, although a significant number did not. Prior to referral, it is worth considering the implication of a 'normal' and 'abnormal' result for the management of the patient. Careful consideration should be given to the development of dedicated dizziness clinics run by practitioners with a specialist interest in balance disorders, in order to ensure appropriate requests for vestibular assessment.

Laboratory-free measurement of gait rhythmicity in the assessment of the degree of impairment and the effectiveness of rehabilitation in patients with vertigo resulting from vestibular hypofunction.

A portable system for measurement of stride time rhythmicity was developed using the technique of Hausdorff et al (2001a Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82 1050-6). Measurement was performed for an extended period of walking of 256 steps for each foot outside of the laboratory on 18 normal individuals and 20 patients referred with symptomatic vestibular impairment. Ten of the patients were reassessed following vestibular therapy. Gait rhythmicity measured by standard deviation (SD) stride time was found to be significantly higher in patients with vestibular impairment than in normal volunteers (mean +/- SD 60.3 +/- 39.8 ms versus 21.9 +/- 4.9 ms respectively, P < 0.001, t-test). The ten patients who returned following a course of vestibular rehabilitation displayed significant improvement in SD stride time following therapy (mean +/- SD 57.3 +/- 44.6 ms prior to and 40.9 +/- 23 ms following therapy, P = 0.01, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Gait rhythmicity measurement, specifically measurement of stride time variability, appears to be a powerful assessment tool for objective measurement of extent of impairment and response to therapy in patients with vestibular hypofunction.

[Comparative assessment of results in cervical vertigo pharmacotherapy vs physiotherapy treatment]. / Porównawcza ocena wyników leczenia zawrotów glowy pochodzenia szyjnego za pomoca farmakoterapii lub fizjoterapii.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy and physiotherapy in cervical vertigo treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 80 patients with cervical vertigo (41 women and 39 men), aged 20 to 85, were treated by pharmacotherapy or physiotherapy. There were two groups: group I was treated by pharmacotherapy and group II was treated by physiotherapy and kinesitherapy. The effects of vertigo treatment were assessed by positional nystagmus testing according to Cawthorne and Rosen; cervical nystagmus testing in neck rotation test; by everyday task self-control cards and vertigo staging system according to Silvoniemi (0-4 points). The effects of treatment were assessed before therapy, 6 and 12 weeks after therapy. Patients from group I were treated by Nootropil and Betaserc; group II received magnetic Fidel, laserotherapy, massage and kinesitherapy exercises. RESULTS: The obtained results showed that the most useful methods of cervical vertigo diagnosis were neck rotation test and Rose method. The average number of points (according to Silvoniemi scale) on the basis of ten everyday activities, was lower after 6 weeks of treatment than before the treatment and the lowest after 12 weeks of treatment. The difference was higher in group II than in group I. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated by physiotherapy (group II) performed better in everyday activities than the patients treated by pharmacotherapy (group I). Cervical vertigo treatment by physiotherapy is cheap and underestimated method.

Vertigo after head injury--a five year follow-up.

Three hundred and twenty-one head injury patients investigated at the Workmen's Compensation Board Hospital and Rehabilitation Centre were studied. The patients were classified into two groups, minor and moderate according to the duration of post-traumatic amnesia. Post-traumatic vertigo was a significant symptom in 34 per cent and 50 per cent of the minor and moderate groups respectively. Based on the findings of full otoneurologic and vestibular examination, objective vestibular disorder was noted in 40 per cent and 65 per cent of the two vertiginous groups respectively. An approach to the interpretation of vestibular and oculomotor abnormalities is outlined in order to assign a peripheral (end organ or nerve), central (brainstem or cerebellar) or undertermined localization. Hearing loss occurred in 20 per cent of the minor and 72 per cent of th e moderate head injury patients tested. A five-year post head injury follow-up was available with respect to recovery of vertigo and work rehabilitation. The results of this follow-up are discussed.