How does cholesterol burden change the case for investing in familial hypercholesterolaemia? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to ascertain how the long-term benefits and costs of diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) vary by prognostic factors and 'cholesterol burden', which is the effect of long-term exposure to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. METHODS: A new cost-effectiveness model was developed from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS), informed by routine data from individuals with FH. The primary outcome was net health gain (i.e., health benefits net of the losses due to costs), expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at the £15,000/QALY threshold. Prognostic factors included pre-treatment LDL-C, age, gender, and CVD history. RESULTS: If cholesterol burden is considered, diagnosis resulted in positive net health gain (i.e., it is cost-effective) in all individuals with pre-treatment LDL-C ≥ 4 mmol/L, and in those with pre-treatment LDL-C ≥ 2 mmol/L aged ≥50 years or who have CVD history. If cholesterol burden is not considered, diagnosis resulted in lower net health gain, but still positive in children aged 10 years with pre-treatment LDL-C ≥ 6 mmol/L and adults aged 30 years with pre-treatment LDL-C ≥ 4 mmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis and treatment of most people with FH results in large net health gains, particularly in those with higher pre-treatment LDL-C. Economic evaluations of FH interventions should consider the sensitivity of the study conclusions to cholesterol burden, particularly where interventions target younger patients, and explicitly consider prognostic factors such as pre-treatment LDL-C, age, and CVD history.

The Assessment of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque among Young Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Objective Few data exist regarding when atherosclerotic changes occur among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Carotid ultrasonography is a non-invasive method of evaluating this issue. The present study (1) compared the clinical utilities of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque score (cPS) and (2) estimated the onset and progression of carotid atherosclerosis among patients with heterozygous FH (HeFH). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 511 patients under 30 years old who underwent carotid ultrasonography at our hospital from 2006 to 2019. We classified them into the HeFH group (n=78, 21.4±5.9 years old) and non-FH group (n=433, 23.4±6.0 years old) based on the clinical diagnosis and compared their cIMT and cPS values. In addition, we estimated the onset and progression of carotid atherosclerosis among young HeFH patients. Results There was no significant difference in the cIMT between the HeFH and non-FH groups (0.44 mm vs. 0.42 mm, p=0.25). In contrast, the cPS was significantly higher in the HeFH group than in the non-FH group (1.11 vs. 0.26, p=0.002). The regression equation for cPS of HeFH group was Y=-2.05+0.15X (r=0.37, p<0.001). Conclusion An assessment based on the cPS rather than the cIMT appears to be better to capture the progress of carotid atherosclerosis among young HeFH patients. Carotid atherosclerosis may start to develop at 14 years old in patients with HeFH.

Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Health Technology Assessment.

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder characterized by abnormally elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol serum levels from birth, which increases the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Genetic testing is a type of a medical test that looks for changes in genes or chromosome structure to discover genetic differences, anomalies, or mutations that may prove pathological. It is regarded as the gold standard for screening and diagnosing FH. We conducted a health technology assessment on genetic testing for people with FH and their relatives (i.e., cascade screening). The assessment included an evaluation of clinical utility (the ability of a test to improve health outcomes), the diagnostic yield (ability of a test to identify people with FH), cost-effectiveness, the budget impact of publicly funding genetic testing for FH, and patient preferences and values. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. For evaluation of clinical utility, we assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the ROBINS-I tool and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria.We performed a systematic economic literature search and conducted a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis with a lifetime horizon from a public payer perspective. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of using genetic testing both for confirming a FH clinical diagnosis and for cascade screening in relatives of genetically confirmed cases. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of cascade screening strategies with genetic testing, sequential testing, and lipid testing approaches. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding genetic testing in Ontario. Results: We included 11 studies in the clinical evidence review. Overall, our review found that genetic testing to diagnose FH improves several health outcomes (GRADE: Moderate) compared with clinical evaluation without a genetic test. We also found that genetic cascade screening leads to a high diagnostic yield of FH.According to our primary economic evaluation, genetic testing is a dominant strategy (more effective and less costly) compared with no genetic testing for individuals with a FH clinical diagnosis. It reduced the number of FH diagnoses, led to fewer cardiovascular events, and improved QALYs. For first-degree relatives of genetically confirmed cases, all cascade screening strategies (genetic testing, sequential testing, and lipid testing) were cost-effective when compared with no cascade screening in a pairwise fashion. The ICERs of cascade screening with genetic, sequential, and lipid testing compared with no cascade screening were $58,390, $50,220, and $45,754 per QALY gained, respectively. When comparing all screening strategies together, cascade screening with lipid testing was the most cost-effective strategy. At commonly used willingness-to-pay values of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY gained, the probability of lipid cascade screening being cost-effective was 53.5% and 71.5%, respectively.The annual budget impact of publicly funding genetic testing for individuals with a clinical FH diagnosis in Ontario ranged from a cost saving of $2 million in year 1 to $64 million in year 5, for a total of $141 million saved over the next 5 years, assuming the cost of genetic testing remains at $490 per person. If only testing-related costs were considered, the budget impact was estimated to be an additional cost of $7 million in year 1, increasing to $20 million in year 5, for a total cost of $64 million over the next 5 years. For relatives of genetically confirmed cases, publicly funding genetic cascade screening would lead to an additional cost of $5 million in year 1, increasing to $27 million in year 5, for a total cost of $73 million over the next 5 years. If only testing-related costs were considered, the budget impact was estimated to be an additional of $66 million. Conclusions: Genetic testing for FH has a higher clinical utility than clinical evaluation without a genetic test. It also results in a high diagnostic yield of FH through cascade screening. For individuals with a clinical diagnosis of FH, genetic testing would be a cost-saving and more effective diagnostic strategy. For relatives of index cases confirmed through genetic testing, genetic and lipid cascade screening are both cost-effective compared with no screening, but genetic cascade screening is less cost-effective than lipid cascade screening. We estimated that publicly funding genetic testing for individuals with a clinical diagnosis of FH in Ontario would save $141 million, and publicly funding genetic testing in a cascade screening program for relatives would cost an additional $73 million over the next five years.Most people with a positive genetic test perceived the screening, diagnosis, and treatment for FH more positively. The discovery of the condition can lead people to adhere to relevant treatments in an effort to control their cholesterol levels. People we spoke with felt that greater awareness and education would allow for more efficient uptake of cascade screening.

Cost-effectiveness of population-wide genomic screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Population genomic screening for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in unselected individuals can prevent premature cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the clinical and economic outcomes of population-wide FH genomic screening versus no genomic screening. METHODS: We developed a decision tree plus 10-state Markov model evaluating the identification of patients with an FH variant, statin treatment status, LDL-C levels, MI, and stroke to compare the costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness of population-wide FH genomic screening. FH variant prevalence (0.4%) was estimated from the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative (MyCode). Genomic test costs were assumed to be $200. Age and sex-based estimates of MI, recurrent MI, stroke, and recurrent stroke were obtained from Framingham risk equations. Additional outcomes independently associated with FH variants were derived from a retrospective analysis of 26,025 participants screened for FH. Sensitivity and threshold analyses were conducted to evaluate model assumptions and uncertainty. RESULTS: FH screening was most effective at younger ages; screening unselected 20-year-olds lead to 111 QALYs gained per 100,000 individuals screened at an incremental cost of $20 M. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for 20-year-olds was $181,000 per QALY, and there was a 38% probability of cost-effectiveness at a $100,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. If genomic testing cost falls to $100, the ICER would be $91,000 per QALY. CONCLUSION: Population FH screening is not cost-effective at current willingness to pay thresholds. However, reducing test costs, testing at younger ages, or including FH within broader multiplex screening panels may improve clinical and economic value.

Familial hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review of modeling studies on screening interventions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: FH is still underdiagnosed. Cost-effectiveness results of preventive screening strategies vary. We aimed at systematically assessing the benefits, harms and cost effectiveness of screening for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and at providing an overview of the main characteristics and methodological approaches of applied decision-analytic models. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EconLit, CRD-databases and the CEA-registry for FH screening starting 2012. Earlier studies were included from a published systematic review. Results were reported in standardized semi-quantitative evidence tables. Costs were converted to current euros. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were recalculated according to economic guidelines. RESULTS: Out of our 211 retrieved studies, eight were included in the review in addition to six studies from an earlier review. Studies were conducted in Europe (UK, The Netherlands, Spain, Poland), USA and Australia evaluating cascade (CS), opportunistic (OS), universal screening (UniS), or combinations using genetic testing, clinical criteria or combinations. Studies evaluating only CS identified strategies with an ICER of up to 37,100 EUR/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) but some strategies were dominated depending on test combinations. UniS of newborns in combination with CS had an ICER≤15,000 EUR/QALY for sequential cholesterol-genetic screening. In other studies, UniS was dominated by OS/CS. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review demonstrates the values of FH screening and provides an overview of potentially relevant screening strategies to be tested using a decision-analytic model for the respective country or region. Future research is needed on the transferability of results to other countries and modeling spillover effects to newborns.

Cost impact of undertaking detection and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia in Australian general practice.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) can be effectively detected and managed in primary care, but the health economic evidence for this is scarce. The aim of this study was to examine management pathways and cost implications of FH screening and management in Australian general practice. METHOD: Cost-effectiveness outcomes were projected using a life table model. Data was used from 133 patients in 15 Australian general practice clinics from an earlier screening and management study. Costing and mortality data were sourced from governmental sources and published literature. RESULTS: Most patients had a regular general practice consultation at baseline (82%), though the proportion seen under a chronic disease management item at follow-up increased to 23%. The median cost of management was $275 per annum in the first year of management. Managing patients with statins up to the age of 60 years yielded an increase of 248,954 life-years at a cost of $759 million, representing a cost per life-year gained of $3047. DISCUSSION: Screening and management of FH in general practice has the potential for substantial health benefits while requiring relatively modest investments from the health system.

Population genomic screening of young adults for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the impact and cost-effectiveness of offering population genomic screening to all young adults in Australia to detect heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). METHODS AND RESULTS: We designed a decision analytic Markov model to compare the current standard of care for heterozygous FH diagnosis in Australia (opportunistic cholesterol screening and genetic cascade testing) with the alternate strategy of population genomic screening of adults aged 18-40 years to detect pathogenic variants in the LDLR/APOB/PCSK9 genes. We used a validated cost-adaptation method to adapt findings to eight high-income countries. The model captured coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity/mortality over a lifetime horizon, from healthcare and societal perspectives. Risk of CHD, treatment effects, prevalence, and healthcare costs were estimated from published studies. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), discounted 5% annually. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to explore the impact of key input parameters on the robustness of the model. Over the lifetime of the population (4 167 768 men; 4 129 961 women), the model estimated a gain of 33 488years of life lived and 51 790 QALYs due to CHD prevention. Population genomic screening for FH would be cost-effective from a healthcare perspective if the per-test cost was ≤AU$250, yielding an ICER of

Assessment of practical applicability and clinical relevance of a commonly used LDL-C polygenic score in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels vary in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and can be explained by a single deleterious genetic variant or by the aggregate effect of multiple, common small-effect variants that can be captured in a polygenic score (PS). We set out to investigate the contribution of a previously published PS to the inter-individual LDL-C variation and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk in patients with a clinical FH phenotype. METHODS: First, in a cohort of 628 patients referred for genetic FH testing, we evaluated the distribution of a PS for LDL-C comprising 12 genetic variants. Next, we determined its association with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk using UK Biobank data. RESULTS: The mean PS was higher in 533 FH-variant-negative patients (FH/M-) compared with 95 FH-variant carriers (1.02 vs 0.94, p < 0.001). 39% of all patients had a PS equal to the top 20% from a population-based reference cohort and these patients were less likely to carry an FH variant (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.48) compared with patients in the lowest 20%. In UK Biobank data, the PS explained 7.4% of variance in LDL-C levels and was associated with incident CAD. Addition of PS to a prediction model using age and sex and LDL-C did not increase the c-statistic for predicting CAD risk. CONCLUSIONS: This 12-variant PS was higher in FH/M- patients and associated with incident CAD in UK Biobank data. However, the PS did not improve predictive accuracy when added to the readily available characteristics age, sex and LDL-C, suggesting limited discriminative value for CAD.

Effectiveness of cascade testing strategies in relatives for familial hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cascade testing in relatives of index cases is the most cost-effective approach to identifying people with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH); however, it is currently unclear which strategy to contact relatives would be the most effective. A systematic review was performed to quantify the effectiveness of different strategies in cascade testing of FH. METHODS: Comprehensive searches of three electronic databases and grey literature sources were done (from inception to May 2020). Screening, data extraction and assessments of methodological quality were made independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed using random effects models. Effect measures are reported as percentages with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: 24 non-comparative studies were included, of which 11 used a direct, 8 used an indirect, and 5 used a combination of both direct and indirect cascade strategies. The median number of new relatives with FH per known index case was approximately 1. The combination strategy resulted in the largest yields of relatives tested for FH out of those contacted (40%, 95% CI 37%-42%, 1 study) and relatives responding to testing out of those contacted (54%, 1 study); however, the direct strategy had the largest yield of index cases participating in cascade testing out of those with FH confirmed (94%, 8 studies) compared to other strategies (p ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is limited; however, a combination strategy, which allows the index case to decide on method of contacting relatives, appears to lead to better yields compared to using the direct or indirect strategy.

Racial Disparities in Modifiable Risk Factors and Statin Usage in Black Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Background Black men and women are at higher risk for, and suffer greater morbidity and mortality from, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared with adults of European Ancestry (EA). Black patients with familial hypercholesterolemia are at particularly high risk for ASCVD complications because of lifelong exposure to elevated levels of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol. Methods and Results This retrospective study analyzed ASCVD prevalence and risk factors in 808 adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia from 5 US-based lipid clinics, and compared findings in Black versus EA patients. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the strongest predictors of ASCVD as a function of race. No significant difference was noted in the prevalence of ASCVD in Black versus EA patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (39% versus 32%, respectively; P=0.15). However, Black versus EA patients had significantly greater prevalence of modifiable risk factors, including body mass index (mean, 32±7 kg/m2 versus 29±6 kg/m2; P<0.001), hypertension (82% versus 50%; P<0.001), diabetes (39% versus 15%; P<0.001), and current smoking (16% versus 8%; P=0.006). Black versus EA patients also had significantly lower usage of statins (61% versus 73%; P=0.004) and other lipid-lowering agents. In a fully adjusted multivariate model, race was not independently associated with ASCVD (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.60-1.49; P=0.72). Conclusions The strongest predictors of ASCVD in Black patients with familial hypercholesterolemia were hypertension and cigarette smoking. These data support wider usage of statins and other lipid-lowering therapies and greater attention to modifiable risk, specifically blood pressure management and smoking cessation.

Assessment of microvascular function and pharmacological regulation in genetically confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic lipid disorder leading to accelerated atherosclerosis, premature cardiovascular disease and death. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction is one of the earliest vascular pathology manifestations and may precede symptomatic atherosclerosis. METHODS: In this paper, microvascular endothelial function was assessed in FH patients and healthy controls using flow mediated skin fluorescence (FMSF), based on measurements of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide fluorescence intensity during brachial artery occlusion (ischemic response, IR) and immediately after occlusion (hyperemic response, HR). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) were used to assess its relation with microvascular parameters evaluated in vivo. RESULTS: LDL-C levels were significantly correlated to both HRmax (r = -0.548, p = 0.001) and HRindex (r = -0.514, p = 0.003). Similarly, there was a significant inverse correlation of TC levels and both HRmax (r = -0.538, p = 0.002) and HRindex (r = -0.512, p = 0.003). All FMSF parameters were found lower in FH patients compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Hyperemic response (HRmax) was significantly higher in FH patients examined on statins compared to those without any lipid-lowering treatment (19.9 ± 3.1 vs. 16.4 ± 4.2 respectively, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, in patients with FH, microvascular endothelial-dependent hyperemic response is impaired and inversely correlated to plasma cholesterol levels. Microvascular function was found better in FH patients receiving statins.

Perceptions and Barriers on the Use of Proprotein Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (From a Survey of Primary Care Physicians and Cardiologists).

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) results in significant elevations in LDL-C and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Current guidelines recommend add-on proprotein subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) therapy for additional LDL-C lowering beyond statins. Data are sparse, however, regarding treatment patterns and barriers relating to PCSK9i in HeFH patients. We examined physician attitudes, use, and barriers for treatment in patients with HeFH. We surveyed 1,000 physicians (500 primary care providers [PCPs] and 500 cardiologists in the US regarding their preferred treatments, experience and barriers associated with using PCSK9is. Cardiologists compared to PCPs were more likely to rank a PCSK9i as most important for an HeFH patient needing additional LDL-C lowering (68.6% vs. 64.8%; p <0.05), as well as prescribing and having a patient on a PCSK9i. PCPs vs. cardiologists were less likely (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 0.46 [0.34-0.63]), private vs. academic practice more likely (OR = 1.53 [1.02-2.28]), and those who would prescribe a PCSK9i in an HeFH patient with (OR = 3.86 [2.57-5.78]) or without (OR = 1.96 [1.40-2.72]) ASCVD needing additional LDL-C reduction beyond a statin were more likely to actually prescribe a PCSK9i. Those practicing in an urban vs. rural setting were less likely (OR = 0.56 [0.34-0.93]), and those indicating they would prescribe a PCKS9i in an HeFH patient with (OR = 2.80 [1.74-4.49]) or without (OR = 1.43 [1.02-2.02]) ASCVD needing additional LDL-C lowering beyond a statin were more likely to face difficulty prescribing a PCSK9i (all p <0.05 to p <0.01). Greater physician education and assistance among both cardiologists and PCPs are needed to address the gaps in understanding and treatment regarding PCSK9is.

Application of the MCDA method for assessing new technologies for familial hypercholesterolaemia treatment / Aplicação do método MCDA para avaliar novas tecnologias para o tratamento da hipercolesterolemia familiar

Objective: Familial hypercholesterolaemia is a hereditary disease characterized by very high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and an elevated risk of early-onset cardiovascular disorders. New drugs provide alternatives for the treatment of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. The study aims to explore a practical application of multiple-criteria decision analysis on prioritization of new and emerging technologies for familial hypercholesterolaemia. Methods: The decision model was constructed using the MACBETH method. There were three stages: structuring the problem, measuring the performance of alternatives, and building the model. The weights for alternatives and levels were obtained by indirect comparisons, which evaluated the attractiveness of the performance levels of the criteria using the swing weights technique. Results: The drugs lomitapide, ezetimibe, evolocumab, and mipomersen were selected as alternatives for decision-making. "Cardiovascular Death", "Stroke" and "Acute Myocardial Infarction" had the three most significant weights. The criteria with the lowest weights were "Comfort" and "LDL-C Reduction". The top-ranked technology was evolocumab, with an overall score of 59.87, followed by ezetimibe, with a score of 37.21. Conclusion: How to apply the result of a higher score in the actual decisionmaking process still requires further studies. The case in question showed that evolocumab has more performance benefits than other drugs but with a cost approximately 50 times higher

Objetivo: A hipercolesterolemia familiar é uma doença hereditária caracterizada por níveis muito elevados de lipoproteína de baixa densidade (LDL-colesterol) e um risco elevado de doenças cardiovasculares de início precoce. Novos medicamentos oferecem alternativas para o tratamento de pacientes com hipercolesterolemia familiar homozigótica. Esse estudo tem como objetivo explorar uma aplicação prática da análise de decisão multicritério na priorização de tecnologias novas e emergentes para hipercolesterolemia familiar. Métodos: O modelo de decisão foi construído usando o método MACBETH. Três etapas foram criadas: estruturação do problema, mensuração do desempenho das alternativas e construção do modelo. Os pesos para alternativas e níveis foram obtidos por comparações indiretas, que avaliaram a atratividade dos níveis de desempenho dos critérios usando a técnica de pesos de balanço. Resultados: Os medicamentos lomitapida, ezetimiba, evolocumabe e mipomersen foram selecionados como alternativas para a tomada de decisão. "Morte Cardiovascular", "Acidente vascular cerebral" e "Infarto Agudo do Miocárdio" tiveram os três pesos mais significativos. Os critérios com os menores pesos foram "Conforto" e "Redução do LDL-C". A tecnologia mais bem avaliada foi o evolocumabe, com pontuação geral de 59,87, seguido da ezetimiba, com pontuação de 37,21. Conclusão: Ainda são necessários estudos para determinar como aplicar o resultado de uma pontuação mais alta no processo de tomada de decisão. O caso em questão demonstrou que o evolocumabe tem benefícios mais significativos em relação aos outros medicamentos, mas com um custo cerca de 50 vezes maior

Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Asia Pacific: A Review of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management in the Region.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common genetic disease that is estimated to affect at least 15 million people in the Asia Pacific region. Affected individuals are at significantly increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. A literature review was undertaken to provide an overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of FH across the region.Currently, epidemiological data relating to FH are lacking across the Asia Pacific. Of the 15 countries and regions considered, locally conducted studies to determine FH prevalence were only identified for Australia, China, India, and Japan. Although practically all national clinical guidelines for dyslipidemia include some commentary on FH, specific guidelines on the management of FH are available for only one third of the countries and regions evaluated. Estimates of current FH diagnosis rates suggest that most affected individuals remain undiagnosed and untreated. Although innovative medications such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors have been approved and are available in most countries and regions considered, they are currently reimbursed in only one quarter.Despite these shortcomings, there is cause for optimism. Early experience with cascade screening in Hong Kong, India, and Vietnam has proven an effective means of identifying family members of probands, as has a reverse screening of family members of children with FH in China. FH registries are gaining momentum across the region, with registries now established in almost half of the countries and regions evaluated. This review concludes with a Call to Action on FH for Asia Pacific to engage healthcare professionals, improve public awareness, and form national FH alliances, comprising all relevant healthcare professional organizations, as a platform to expedite national quality improvement programs in the management of FH.

Awareness, diagnosis and treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) - Results of a US national survey.

BACKGROUND: HeFH is a common inherited disorder that leads to markedly elevated LDL-cholesterol from birth and premature cardiovascular disease. HeFH is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. OBJECTIVE: To compare how well primary care physicians and cardiologists recognize and treat HeFH. METHODS: The National Lipid Association surveyed 500 primary care physicians and 500 cardiologists in the US who have patients with baseline LDL-cholesterol ≥ 190 mg/dL. The survey was conducted between August 29 and September 30, 2019. RESULTS: For a hypothetical case of HeFH, 57% of cardiologists versus 43% of primary care physicians made the correct diagnosis (P<0.001). Among respondents, 21% of cardiologists versus 29% of primary care physicians have never made a diagnosis of HeFH in a patient with an LDL-cholesterol ≥ 190 mg/dL (P<0.004). Only 7% of cardiologists versus 5% of primary care physicians would refer to a lipid specialist (P=0.05). For additional LDL-cholesterol lowering after statins, 58% of cardiologists versus 48% of primary care physicians would prescribe a PCSK9 inhibitor (P=0.004); however, 30% of cardiologists versus 53% of primary care physicians have never prescribed a PSCK9 inhibitor in an HeFH patient (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although cardiologists compared to primary care physicians are somewhat more likely to recognize and treat HeFH patients according to guidelines, both physician specialties do not adequately recognize or treat HeFH. There is a need for more education and training in recognizing and treating HeFH, greater access to lipid specialists, and fewer barriers for PCSK9 inhibitor use.

Awareness, treatment rates, and compliance to treatment in patients with serum LDL cholesterol higher than 250 mg/dL, and possible, probable, or definite familial hypercholesterolemia.

PURPOSE: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disease characterized by increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). It is underdiagnosed and undertreated despite relatively high prevalance and significant association with increased mortality. We aimed to determine treatment status and compliance in patients with LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL and FH. DESIGN: Patients older than 18 years old and have a serum LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL between January 2010 to December 2016 were identified from the hospital database. A phone survey was performed. Demographic features, smoking status, alcohol use, exercise, cardiovascular disease (CVD), use of medication for dyslipidemia, and CVD and high cholesterol levels in the family were questioned. Dutch Lipid Clinical Network Criteria was used to classify patients. The study was registered to Clinicaltrials.gov in July 2020 (NCT04494464). RESULTS: 1365 patients with a LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL were identified. Patients that could not be reached and who refused to interview were excluded and the data of 367 patients were analyzed. There were 248 (67.6%) female and 119 (32.4%) male patients and mean age was 50.52 ± 11.66. LDL-C was ≥330 mg/dL in 50 (13.6%) and 250-329 mg/dL in 317 (86.4%) patients. Forty (10.9%) patients were classified as definite, 181 (49.3%) as probable and 146 (39.8%) as possible FH. 213 (58.0%) patients were not receiving lipid-lowering treatment, and 162 (76.1%) stated that medication was never recommended previously, 30 (14.1%) had stopped medication him/herself and 21 (9.8%) had stopped medication with the advice of the physician. Among patients with definite/probable FH, 84 (38.0%) had CVD and the rate of lipid-lowering drug use in these patients was 58.3%. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL were not taking lipid-lowering drugs. Similar with many other studies, diagnosis, and treatment rates of FH patients were very low in our study. Further national studies are required to increase awareness of the disease in both physicians and patients.

Cost-Effectiveness of Evolocumab Therapy for Myocardial Infarction: The Chinese Healthcare Perspective.

PURPOSE: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are an indispensable lipid-lowering treatment option, but their cost-effectiveness has been questioned. This study aimed to perform a health economic evaluation of evolocumab versus placebo in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) in China. METHODS: A Markov cohort state-transition model was developed in decision analysis software to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. The simulation subjects could undergo non-fatal MI and/or stroke, or vascular or non-vascular death event. We integrated the Chinese population-specific demographics and event rates with the risk reduction of evolocumab based on the FOURIER trial and/or lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Age-related change, event costs and utilities were included from published sources. RESULTS: At its current list price [33,748 Chinese yuan (CNY) annually per person], the ICER for evolocumab therapy was 927,713 CNY per QALY gained when integrating the FOURIER trial with absolute reduction of LDL-C. The probability of cost-effectiveness of evolocumab versus placebo was 1.96%, with a generally accepted threshold of 212,676 CNY per QALY gained. A reduction in acquisition price by approximately 70% (to less than 10,255 CNY annually) was needed to be cost-effective. Alternative scenario analyses of therapeutic benefit showed that the ICER for evolocumab in MI patients with uncontrolled familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) was 187,736 CNY per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Evolocumab in patients with MI was not cost-effective based on the price in 2019 in China; however, treatment with evolocumab was more favorable in MI patients with FH.

Feasibility and cost of FH cascade screening in Belgium (BEL-CASCADE) including a novel rapid rule-out strategy.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is underdiagnosed in most countries. We report our first experience from a national pilot project of cascade screening in relatives of FH patients. METHODOLOGY: Participating specialists recruited consecutive index patients (IP) with Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score ≥6. After informed consent, the relatives were visited by the nurses to collect relevant clinical data and perform blood sampling for lipid profile measurement. FH diagnosis in the relatives was based on the DLCN and/or MEDPED FH (Make-Early-Diagnosis-to-Prevent-Early-Deaths-in-FH) criteria. RESULTS: In a period of 18 months, a total of 127 IP (90 with definite FH and 37 with probable FH) were enrolled in 15 centres. Out of the 270 relatives visited by the nurses, 105 were suspected of having FH: 31 with DCLN score >8, 33 with DLCN score 5-8 and 41 with MEDPED FH criteria. In a post-hoc analysis, another set of MEDPED FH criteria established in the Netherlands and adapted to Belgium allowed to detect FH in 51 additional relatives. CONCLUSION: In a country with no national FH screening program, our pilot project demonstrated that implementing a simple phenotypical FH cascade screening strategy using the collaboration of motivated specialists and two nurses, allowed to diagnose FH in 127 index patients and an additional 105 of their relatives over the two-year period. Newly developed MEDPED FH cut-offs, easily applicable by a nurse with a single blood sample, might further improve the sensitivity of detecting FH within families.