Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Complementary and alternative medicine use and cost in functional bowel disorders: a six month prospective study in a large HMO.
van Tilburg, Miranda A L; Palsson, Olafur S; Levy, Rona L; Feld, Andrew D; Turner, Marsha J; Drossman, Douglas A; Whitehead, William E.
Afiliação
  • van Tilburg MA; Center for Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. tilburg@med.unc.edu
BMC Complement Altern Med ; 8: 46, 2008 Jul 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18652682
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Functional Bowel Disorders (FBD) are chronic disorders that are difficult to treat and manage. Many patients and doctors are dissatisfied with the level of improvement in symptoms that can be achieved with standard medical care which may lead them to seek alternatives for care. There are currently no data on the types of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) used for FBDs other than Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), or on the economic costs of CAM treatments. The aim of this study is to determine prevalence, types and costs of CAM in IBS, functional diarrhea, functional constipation, and functional abdominal pain.

METHODS:

1012 Patients with FBD were recruited through a health care maintenance organization and followed for 6 months. Questionnaires were used to ascertain Utilization and expenditures on CAM, symptom severity (IBS-SS), quality of life (IBS-QoL), psychological distress (BSI) and perceived treatment effectiveness. Costs for conventional medical care were extracted from administrative claims.

RESULTS:

CAM was used by 35% of patients, at a median yearly cost of $200. The most common CAM types were ginger, massage therapy and yoga. CAM use was associated with female gender, higher education, and anxiety. Satisfaction with physician care and perceived effectiveness of prescription medication were not associated with CAM use. Physician referral to a CAM provider was uncommon but the majority of patients receiving this recommendation followed their physician's advice.

CONCLUSION:

CAM is used by one-third of FBD patients. CAM use does not seem to be driven by dissatisfaction with conventional care. Physicians should discuss CAM use and effectiveness with their patients and refer patients if appropriate.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais / Financiamentos_gastos Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapias Complementares / Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde / Satisfação do Paciente / Síndrome do Intestino Irritável Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Complement Altern Med Assunto da revista: TERAPIAS COMPLEMENTARES Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais / Financiamentos_gastos Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapias Complementares / Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde / Satisfação do Paciente / Síndrome do Intestino Irritável Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Complement Altern Med Assunto da revista: TERAPIAS COMPLEMENTARES Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos