Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characteristics, healthcare utilization and costs of bipolar disorder type I patients with and without frequent psychiatric intervention in a Medicaid population.
Durden, Emily; Bagalman, Erin; Muser, Erik; Choi, Jiyoon C; Crivera, Concetta; Dirani, Riad; Macfadden, Wayne; Haskins, J Thomas.
Afiliação
  • Durden E; Thomson Reuters, Washington, DC, USA.
J Med Econ ; 13(4): 698-704, 2010.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21073403
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare characteristics, healthcare resource utilization and costs of Medicaid bipolar disorder (BPD) type I (BP-I) patients with and without frequent psychiatric intervention (FPI).

METHODS:

Adults with BP-I, ≥ 1 prescription claim for a mood stabilizer/atypical antipsychotic and 24 months' continuous medical/prescription coverage were identified (MarketScan* Medicaid database). Patients with ≥ 2 clinically significant events (CSEs) during a 12-month identification period had FPI. CSEs included emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of BPD, addition of a new medication to the first observed treatment regimen or ≥ 50% increase in BPD medication dose. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated for the identification period, and healthcare utilization and costs for the 12-month follow-up. Multivariate generalized linear modeling and multivariate logistic regression, respectively, were used to evaluate the impact of FPI on all-cause and psychiatric-related costs and risk of psychiatric-related hospitalization and ED visit during follow-up.

RESULTS:

Of 5,527 BP-I patients, 53% had FPI. Relative to patients without FPI, those with FPI were younger and more likely to be female, had higher adjusted all-cause (+US$3,232, p < 0.001) and psychiatric-related (+US$2,519, p < 0.001) costs and higher risk of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.681, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.85-4.75) and ED visit (OR = 3.094, 95% CI = 2.55-3.76).

LIMITATIONS:

Analysis used a convenience sample of Medicaid enrollees in several geographically dispersed states, limiting generalizability. Analyses of administrative claims data depend on accurate diagnoses and data entry.

CONCLUSION:

BP-I patients with FPI incurred significantly higher healthcare resource utilization and costs during the follow-up period than those without FPI.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais / Financiamentos_gastos Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtorno Bipolar / Medicaid / Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Implementation_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Med Econ Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais / Financiamentos_gastos Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtorno Bipolar / Medicaid / Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Implementation_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Med Econ Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos