Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge and opinions about the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) committee, the Women's Health Amendment, and the Affordable Care Act: national study after the release of the USPSTF 2009 Breast Cancer Screening Recommendation Statement.
Anderson, Britta L; Urban, Renata R; Pearlman, Mark; Schulkin, Jay.
Afiliação
  • Anderson BL; Department of Research, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, USA. Electronic address: banderson@acog.org.
  • Urban RR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, USA.
  • Pearlman M; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Schulkin J; Department of Research, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, USA.
Prev Med ; 59: 79-82, 2014 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24246966
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Investigate the knowledge and opinions of obstetrician and gynecologists (ob-gyns) regarding the USPSTF committee and statement, and to assess their reactions to healthcare legislation.

METHODS:

A national cross-sectional survey study of ob-gyns was conducted six months after a controversial USPSTF recommendation statement was released in November 2009. Ob-gyns' opinions about the Women's Health Amendment (WHA) and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were also assessed.

RESULTS:

A total of 54% of ob-gyns knew that the USPSTF recommendations do not represent the position of the U.S. government and 40% knew that the USPSTF is not comprised of federal employees. A majority (60%) thought that the USPSTF was influenced by potential costs more than guidelines should be. When examining ob-gyns opinions about new national health policies, 88% support the mammography coverage provided by the WHA but support for the ACA varied.

CONCLUSION:

This study provides a snapshot of ob-gyns' knowledge and opinions about the USPSTF and breast cancer screening guidelines at a controversial point in time. Our findings are a unique contribution to larger efforts to understand health and political policy as the culture of medicine continues to evolve.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Programas de Rastreamento / Saúde da Mulher / Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Ginecologia / Obstetrícia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Programas de Rastreamento / Saúde da Mulher / Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Ginecologia / Obstetrícia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article