Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
De-Deus, Gustavo André; Nogueira Leal Silva, Emmanuel João; Moreira, Edson Jorge; de Almeida Neves, Aline; Belladonna, Felipe Gonçalves; Tameirão, Michele.
Afiliação
  • De-Deus GA; Department of Endodontology, Grande Rio University, Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Electronic address: endogus@gmail.com.
  • Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Department of Endodontology, Grande Rio University, Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Moreira EJ; Department of Endodontology, Grande Rio University, Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • de Almeida Neves A; Department of Endodontology, Grande Rio University, Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Belladonna FG; Department of Endodontology, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Tameirão M; Department of Endodontology, Grande Rio University, Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Endod ; 40(4): 526-9, 2014 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24666904
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This study was designed to quantitatively evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris by the Self-Adjusting-File system (SAF; ReDent-Nova, Ra'anana, Israel). Hand and rotary instruments were used as references for comparison.

METHODS:

Sixty mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 20). The root canals were instrumented with hand files using a crown-down technique. The ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and SAF systems were used according to the manufacturers' instructions. Sodium hypochlorite was used as an irrigant, and the apically extruded debris was collected in preweighted glass vials and dried afterward. The mean weight of debris was assessed with a microbalance and statistically analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey multiple comparison test.

RESULTS:

Hand file instrumentation produced significantly more debris compared with the ProTaper and SAF systems (P < .05). The ProTaper system produced significantly more debris compared with the SAF system (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Under the conditions of this study, all systems caused apical debris extrusion. SAF instrumentation was associated with less debris extrusion compared with the use of hand and rotary files.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Camada de Esfregaço / Preparo de Canal Radicular / Ápice Dentário / Cavidade Pulpar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endod Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Camada de Esfregaço / Preparo de Canal Radicular / Ápice Dentário / Cavidade Pulpar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endod Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article