Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Zargar, Homayoun; Espiritu, Patrick N; Fairey, Adrian S; Mertens, Laura S; Dinney, Colin P; Mir, Maria C; Krabbe, Laura-Maria; Cookson, Michael S; Jacobsen, Niels-Erik; Gandhi, Nilay M; Griffin, Joshua; Montgomery, Jeffrey S; Vasdev, Nikhil; Yu, Evan Y; Youssef, David; Xylinas, Evanguelos; Campain, Nicholas J; Kassouf, Wassim; Dall'Era, Marc A; Seah, Jo-An; Ercole, Cesar E; Horenblas, Simon; Sridhar, Srikala S; McGrath, John S; Aning, Jonathan; Shariat, Shahrokh F; Wright, Jonathan L; Thorpe, Andrew C; Morgan, Todd M; Holzbeierlein, Jeff M; Bivalacqua, Trinity J; North, Scott; Barocas, Daniel A; Lotan, Yair; Garcia, Jorge A; Stephenson, Andrew J; Shah, Jay B; van Rhijn, Bas W; Daneshmand, Siamak; Spiess, Philippe E; Black, Peter C.
Afiliação
  • Zargar H; Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Espiritu PN; Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Fairey AS; USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Mertens LS; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dinney CP; Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Mir MC; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Krabbe LM; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Cookson MS; Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
  • Jacobsen NE; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Gandhi NM; Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Griffin J; Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
  • Montgomery JS; Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Vasdev N; Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Yu EY; Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Youssef D; Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Xylinas E; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • Campain NJ; Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
  • Kassouf W; Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Dall'Era MA; Department of Urology, University of California at Davis, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Seah JA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ercole CE; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Horenblas S; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Sridhar SS; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • McGrath JS; Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
  • Aning J; Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
  • Shariat SF; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
  • Wright JL; Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Thorpe AC; Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Morgan TM; Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Holzbeierlein JM; Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
  • Bivalacqua TJ; Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • North S; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Barocas DA; Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Lotan Y; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Garcia JA; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Stephenson AJ; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Shah JB; Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • van Rhijn BW; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Daneshmand S; USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Spiess PE; Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Black PC; Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: pblack@mail.ubc.ca.
Eur Urol ; 67(2): 241-9, 2015 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25257030
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) was established primarily with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), with complete response rates (pT0) as high as 38%. However, because of the comparable efficacy with better tolerability of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with metastatic disease, GC has become the most commonly used regimen in the neoadjuvant setting.

OBJECTIVE:

We aimed to assess real-world pathologic response rates to NAC with different regimens in a large, multicenter cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Data were collected retrospectively at 19 centers on patients with clinical cT2-4aN0M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who received at least three cycles of NAC, followed by radical cystectomy (RC), between 2000 and 2013. INTERVENTION NAC and RC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS:

The primary outcome was pathologic stage at cystectomy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine factors predictive of pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 stages. RESULTS AND

LIMITATIONS:

Data were collected on 935 patients who met inclusion criteria. GC was used in the majority of the patients (n=602; 64.4%), followed by MVAC (n=183; 19.6%) and other regimens (n=144; 15.4%). The rates of pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 pathologic response were 22.7% and 40.8%, respectively. The rate of pT0N0 disease for patients receiving GC was 23.9%, compared with 24.5% for MVAC (p=0.2). There was no difference between MVAC and GC in pT0N0 on multivariable analysis (odds ratio 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.34]; p=0.6).

CONCLUSIONS:

Response rates to NAC were lower than those reported in prospective randomized trials, and we did not discern a difference between MVAC and GC. Without any evidence from randomized prospective trials, the best NAC regimen for invasive BCa remains to be determined. PATIENT

SUMMARY:

There was no apparent difference in the response rates to the two most common presurgical chemotherapy regimens for patients with bladder cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá