Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of an Inexpensive Growth Medium for Direct Detection of Escherichia coli in Temperate and Sub-Tropical Waters.
Bain, Robert E S; Woodall, Claire; Elliott, John; Arnold, Benjamin F; Tung, Rosalind; Morley, Robert; du Preez, Martella; Bartram, Jamie K; Davis, Anthony P; Gundry, Stephen W; Pedley, Stephen.
Afiliação
  • Bain RE; UNICEF, New York, United States of America.
  • Woodall C; School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Elliott J; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
  • Arnold BF; Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America.
  • Tung R; CPI International, Santa Rosa, CA, United States of America.
  • Morley R; Public Health England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • du Preez M; Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Bartram JK; The Water Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
  • Davis AP; School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Gundry SW; Brightwater Diagnostics Limited, Bath, United Kingdom.
  • Pedley S; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 10(10): e0140997, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26495983
The cost and complexity of traditional methods for the detection of faecal indicator bacteria, including E. coli, hinder widespread monitoring of drinking water quality, especially in low-income countries and outside controlled laboratory settings. In these settings the problem is exacerbated by the lack of inexpensive media for the detection of E. coli in drinking water. We developed a new low-cost growth medium, aquatest (AT), and validated its use for the direct detection of E. coli in temperate and sub-tropical drinking waters using IDEXX Quanti-Tray®. AT was compared with IDEXX Colilert-18® and either EC-MUG or MLSB for detecting low levels of E. coli from water samples from temperate (n = 140; Bristol, UK) and subtropical regions (n = 50, Pretoria/Tshwane, South Africa). Confirmatory testing (n = 418 and 588, respectively) and the comparison of quantitative results were used to assess performance. Sensitivity of AT was higher than Colilert-18® for water samples in the UK [98.0% vs. 86.9%; p<0.0001] and South Africa [99.5% vs. 93.2%; p = 0.0030]. There was no significant difference in specificity, which was high for both media (>95% in both settings). Quantitative results were comparable and within expected limits. AT is reliable and accurate for the detection of E. coli in temperate and subtropical drinking water. The composition of the new medium is reported herein and can be used freely.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Microbiologia da Água / Água Potável / Monitoramento Ambiental / Escherichia coli Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa / Europa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Microbiologia da Água / Água Potável / Monitoramento Ambiental / Escherichia coli Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa / Europa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos