Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Infant Robotic Cleft Palate Surgery: A Feasibility Assessment Using a Realistic Cleft Palate Simulator.
Podolsky, Dale J; Fisher, David M; Wong Riff, Karen W Y; Looi, Thomas; Drake, James M; Forrest, Christopher R.
Afiliação
  • Podolsky DJ; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Fisher DM; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto; the Center for Image-Guided Innovation and Therapeutic Intervention; and the Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children.
  • Wong Riff KWY; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Looi T; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto; the Center for Image-Guided Innovation and Therapeutic Intervention; and the Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children.
  • Drake JM; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Forrest CR; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto; the Center for Image-Guided Innovation and Therapeutic Intervention; and the Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 139(2): 455e-465e, 2017 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28121879
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A surgical robot offers enhanced precision, visualization, and access and the potential to improve outcomes in cleft palate surgery. The goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using the da Vinci robot for cleft palate repair in infants using a cleft palate simulator test bed.

METHODS:

A high-fidelity cleft palate simulator was developed that allows performance of a robotic cleft palate repair procedure. A complete cleft palate repair was performed with the da Vinci Si with 5-mm instruments and the da Vinci Xi with 8-mm instruments. The advantages of the robotic approach were assessed in comparison with using standard instruments. For each system, arm repositioning, collisions, instrument and endoscope excursion, wrist orientation, and vision were compared for 12 steps of the repair.

RESULTS:

The cleft palate simulator provided a reproducible platform for testing robotic cleft palate surgery. The advantages of the robotic approach were the ability to articulate a miniature wrist intraorally with superior visualization, increased ambidexterity, and improved ergonomics compared with using standard instruments. Cleft palate repair with the Xi was superior to the Si with respect to arm repositioning, instrument collisions and excursion, and wrist orientation. However, Xi performance remained suboptimal because of the larger instruments.

CONCLUSIONS:

Robotic cleft palate repair using the da Vinci system offers advantages compared with the traditional approach. Cleft palate repair is more feasible with the Xi and 8-mm instruments. However, performance is limited by the instrumentation, which requires modification to ensure safety and efficacy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, V.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fissura Palatina / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Limite: Humans / Infant Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fissura Palatina / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Limite: Humans / Infant Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá