Large care gaps in primary care management of asthma: a longitudinal practice audit.
BMJ Open
; 9(1): e022506, 2019 01 29.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30696669
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
Care gaps in asthma may be highly prevalent but are poorly characterised. We sought to prospectively measure adherence to key evidence-based adult asthma practices in primary care, and predictors of these behaviours.DESIGN:
One-year prospective cohort study employing an electronic chart audit.SETTING:
Three family health teams (two academic, one community-based) in Ontario, Canada.PARTICIPANTS:
884 patients (72.1% female; 46.0±17.5 years old) (4199 total visits; 4.8±4.8 visits/patient) assigned to 23 physicians (65% female; practising for 10.0±8.6 years). MAIN OUTCOMEMEASURES:
The primary outcome was the proportion of visits during which practitioners assessed asthma control according to symptom-based criteria. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who had asthma control assessed at least once; visits during which a controller medication was initiated or escalated; and patients who received a written asthma action plan. Behavioural predictors were established a priori and tested in a multivariable model.RESULTS:
Primaryoutcome:
Providers assessed asthma control in 4.9% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing assessment included clinic site (p=0.019) and presenting symptom, with providers assessing control more often during visits for asthma symptoms (35.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (18.8%) relative to other visits (1.6%) (p<0.01). SECONDARYOUTCOMES:
Providers escalated controller therapy in 3.3% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing escalation included clinic site, presenting symptom and prior objective asthma diagnosis. Escalation occurred more frequently during visits for asthma symptoms (21.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (11.9%) relative to other visits (1.5%) (p<0.01) and in patients without a prior objective asthma diagnosis (3.5%) relative to those with (1.3%) (p=0.025). No asthma action plans were delivered.CONCLUSIONS:
Major gaps in evidence-based asthma practice exist in primary care. Targeted knowledge translation interventions are required to address these gaps, and can be tailored by leveraging the identified behavioural predictors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01070095; Pre-results.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Temas:
ECOS
/
Gestao
Bases de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Visita a Consultório Médico
/
Atenção Primária à Saúde
/
Asma
/
Padrões de Prática Médica
/
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
País/Região como assunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Revista:
BMJ Open
Ano de publicação:
2019
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Canadá