Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of Heat Stress Exposure among Construction Workers in the Hot Desert Climate of Saudi Arabia.
Al-Bouwarthan, Mohammed; Quinn, Margaret M; Kriebel, David; Wegman, David H.
Afiliação
  • Al-Bouwarthan M; Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA.
  • Quinn MM; Department of Environmental Health, College of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
  • Kriebel D; Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA.
  • Wegman DH; Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 63(5): 505-520, 2019 05 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31051037
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Excessive heat exposure poses significant risks to workers in hot climates. This study assessed the intensity and duration of heat stress exposure among workers performing residential construction in southeastern Saudi Arabia (SA) during the summer, June-September 2016. Objectives were to identify work factors related to heat stress exposure; measure environmental heat exposure at the construction sites; assess the heat stress risk among workers using the wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) index; and determine if temperature-humidity indices can be appropriate alternatives to WBGT for managing heat stress risk at the construction sites.

METHODS:

Worksite walkthrough surveys and environmental monitoring were performed, indoors and outdoors, at 10 construction sites in Al-Ahsa Province. A heat stress exposure assessment was conducted according to the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH®) guidelines, which uses the WBGT index. WBGT measurements from two instruments were compared. Alternative heat stress indices were compared to the WBGT the heat index (HI) and humidex (HD) index.

RESULTS:

Construction workers were exposed to excessive heat stress, indoors and outdoors over a large part of the work day. Complying with a midday outdoor work ban (12-3 p.m.) was not effective in reducing heat stress risk. The highest intensity of exposure was outdoors from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.; a period identified with the highest hourly mean WBGT values (31-33°C) and the least allowable working time according to ACGIH® guidelines. Comparison of the alternative indices showed that the HI is more reliable than the HD as a surrogate for the WBGT index in the climate studied.

CONCLUSION:

The extreme heat exposure represents a serious risk. The severity of heat stress and its impact are projected to increase due to climate change, emphasizing the need for immediate improvement of the current required protective measures and the development of occupational heat stress exposure guidelines in SA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Indústria da Construção / Exposição Ocupacional / Transtornos de Estresse por Calor Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Ann Work Expo Health Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Indústria da Construção / Exposição Ocupacional / Transtornos de Estresse por Calor Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Ann Work Expo Health Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos