Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
UK tobacco price increases: driven by industry or public health?
Hiscock, Rosemary; Branston, J Robert; Partos, Timea R; McNeill, Ann; Hitchman, Sara C; Gilmore, Anna B.
Afiliação
  • Hiscock R; Tobacco Control Research Group, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
  • Branston JR; School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK J.R.Branston@bath.ac.uk.
  • Partos TR; Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
  • McNeill A; Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
  • Hitchman SC; Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
  • Gilmore AB; Tobacco Control Research Group, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Tob Control ; 28(e2): e148-e150, 2019 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31346068
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Tobacco companies claim that higher taxes will force smokers into buying illicit tobacco, but if they were truly concerned about increasing illicit sales with higher prices they would only increase retail prices in line with changes in taxation. In this paper, we explore UK pricing of both factory-made cigarettes (FM) and roll-your-own tobacco (RYO) to explore the extent to which price increases were due to government tax rises or industry strategies to increase profit per pack.

METHOD:

Nielsen commercial data on UK tobacco sales data (2010-2015) were combined with official UK data on inflation and tax rates, to identify the source of real price increases.

RESULTS:

Between 2010 and 2012, when there were unexpected large tax increases, industry driven price changes were small (16% of the price rise in FM and 20% in RYO), and changes were similar between market segments. Between 2013 and 2015, when tax increases were smaller and expected, industry behaviour generally accounted for a larger share of price rises (33% FM, 48% RYO), but changes varied considerably by segment.

CONCLUSION:

The industry has increased its prices beyond that required by tax changes, even when tax rises were larger and unexpected, although were notably smaller in such conditions. This suggests (1) that the industry is not actually concerned by the threat of illicit, especially since RYO had the highest levels of industry driven price increases despite higher levels of illicit, and (2) there remains scope for further tax increases, which should be relatively large and unexpected.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais / Financiamentos_gastos Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Pública / Comércio / Indústria do Tabaco / Produtos do Tabaco Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Tob Control Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais / Financiamentos_gastos Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Pública / Comércio / Indústria do Tabaco / Produtos do Tabaco Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Tob Control Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido