Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Criteria for item selection for a preference-based measure for use in economic evaluation.
Peasgood, Tessa; Mukuria, Clara; Carlton, Jill; Connell, Janice; Brazier, John.
Afiliação
  • Peasgood T; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. Tessa.Peasgood@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Mukuria C; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Tessa.Peasgood@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Carlton J; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Connell J; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Brazier J; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Qual Life Res ; 30(5): 1425-1432, 2021 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33289063
ABSTRACT
Preference-based measures allow patients to report their level of health, and the responses are then scored using preference weights from a representative general population sample for use in cost utility analysis. The development process of new preference-based measures should ensure that valid items are selected to reflect the constructs of interest included in the measure and that are suitable for use in preference-elicitation exercises. Existing criteria on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) development were reviewed, and additional considerations were taken into account in order to generate criteria to support development of new preference-based measures. Criteria covering 22 different aspects related to item selection for preference-based measures are presented. These include criteria related to how items are phrased to ensure accurate completion, the coverage of items in terms of range of domains as well as focus on current outcomes and whether items are suitable for valuation. The criteria are aimed at supporting the development of new preference-based measures with discussion to ensure that even where there is conflict between criteria, issues have been considered at the item selection stage. This would minimize problems at valuation stage by harmonizing established criteria and expanding lists to reflect the unique characteristics of preference-based measures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais / Avaliacao_economica Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Análise Custo-Benefício / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Qual Life Res Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais / Avaliacao_economica Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Análise Custo-Benefício / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Qual Life Res Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido