Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy.
Cold, Kristoffer Mazanti; Svendsen, Morten Bo Søndergaard; Bodtger, Uffe; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy; Clementsen, Paul Frost; Konge, Lars.
Afiliação
  • Cold KM; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, kristoffer.mazanti.cold@regionh.dk.
  • Svendsen MBS; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Bodtger U; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.
  • Nayahangan LJ; Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Clementsen PF; Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Konge L; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Respiration ; 100(4): 347-355, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33550311
BACKGROUND: Motor skills have been identified as a useful measure to evaluate competency in bronchoscopy. However, no automatic assessment system of motor skills with a clear pass/fail criterion in flexible bronchoscopy exists. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to develop an objective and automatic measure of motor skills in bronchoscopy and set a pass/fail criterion. METHODS: Participants conducted 3 bronchoscopies each in a simulated setting. They were equipped with a Myo Armband that measured lower arm movements through an inertial measurement unit, and hand and finger motions through electromyography sensors. These measures were composed into an objective and automatic composite score of motor skills, the motor bronchoscopy skills score (MoBSS). RESULTS: Twelve novices, eleven intermediates, and ten expert bronchoscopy operators participated, resulting in 99 procedures available for assessment. MoBSS was correlated with a higher diagnostic completeness (Pearson's correlation, r = 0.43, p < 0.001) and a lower procedure time (Pearson's correlation, r = -0.90, p < 0.001). MoBSS was able to differentiate operator performance based on the experience level (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). Using the contrasting groups' method, a passing score of -0.08 MoBSS was defined that failed 30/36 (83%) novice, 5/33 (15%) intermediate, and 1/30 (3%) expert procedures. CONCLUSIONS: MoBSS can be used as an automatic and unbiased assessment tool for motor skills performance in flexible bronchoscopy. MoBSS has the potential to generate automatic feedback to help guide trainees toward expert performance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Broncoscopia / Competência Clínica / Avaliação Educacional / Destreza Motora Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Respiration Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Broncoscopia / Competência Clínica / Avaliação Educacional / Destreza Motora Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Respiration Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article