Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of Mammography Screening Guideline Changes in a Universally Insured Population.
Bytnar, Julie A; Byrne, Celia; Olsen, Cara; Witkop, Catherine; Martin, Mary Beth; Banaag, Amanda; Koehlmoos, Tracey.
Afiliação
  • Bytnar JA; Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Byrne C; Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Olsen C; Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Witkop C; Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Martin MB; Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Banaag A; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular and Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Koehlmoos T; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 30(12): 1720-1728, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33600239
ABSTRACT

Background:

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) modified breast cancer screening guidelines in November 2009. The impact has been studied among privately and Medicare insured populations, but not among universally insured women. Materials and

Methods:

This study compared the proportion of TRICARE beneficiaries aged 40-64 receiving mammograms from fiscal years 2006 to 2015 using an interrupted time series analysis to determine the impact of the 2009 USPSTF guideline changes. Stratified analyses evaluated differences by age (ages 40-49, 50-64), race, care setting, beneficiary type, and military status.

Results:

The proportion of women receiving mammograms increased from October 2005 through September 2009. A small, but significant decrease of 65-66 fewer women screened per 10,000 occurred in the first quarter of 2010 (October 1 to December 31) following the screening guideline update publication. The proportion screened then remained unchanged through 2015. Comparative analysis revealed no differences in impact between age groups, blacks and whites, or military dependents and active-duty/retirees.

Conclusions:

This study determined that the USPSTF guideline updates had a small, but immediate and lasting impact that was not different across age groups, beneficiary type, or race. No racial disparities in the proportion screened or in the impact of the guideline change were noted in our universally insured population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Medicare Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / SAUDE DA MULHER Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Medicare Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / SAUDE DA MULHER Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos