Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The association between three key social determinants of health and life dissatisfaction: A 2017 behavioral risk factor surveillance system analysis.
Lund, Julia J; Chen, Tiffany T; LaBazzo, Gabriella E; Hawes, Stephen E; Mooney, Stephen J.
Afiliação
  • Lund JJ; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, United States of America. Electronic address: jlund48@uw.edu.
  • Chen TT; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
  • LaBazzo GE; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
  • Hawes SE; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
  • Mooney SJ; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Prev Med ; 153: 106724, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34271074
Poor health outcomes disproportionately impact certain populations in the United States owing to the inequitable distribution of social determinants of health (SDOH). Using the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), we estimated the association of three adverse SDOH (housing insecurity, food insecurity, and financial instability) with life dissatisfaction. Participants were from Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Ohio, the only states that included the SDOH and Emotional Support and Life Satisfaction modules (n = 25,850). Six percent of respondents reported life dissatisfaction. Those who reported housing insecurity (Prevalence difference (PD) = 14.2 per 100, 95% CI [7.6, 20.7]), food insecurity (PD = 10.9 [7.1, 14.7]), and financial instability (PD = 5.6 [4.9, 6.3]) had higher prevalence of life dissatisfaction. The differences in prevalence of life dissatisfaction, comparing those with and without an adverse SDOH, decreased with increased emotional support (for housing insecurity, food insecurity, and financial instability, respectively: low support, PD = 30.2 [11.6, 48.8], 22.1 [11.6, 32.6], 16.4 [12.0, 20.8]; high support, PD = 4.8 [-2.9, 12.6], 4.8 [0.0, 9.7], 1.7 [1.1, 2.3]). Participants with frequent mental distress (FMD) had greater prevalence differences than those without FMD (for housing insecurity, food insecurity, and financial instability, respectively: with FMD, PD = 15.4 [7.5, 23.3], 10.7 [4.7, 16.7], 14.4 [9.6, 19.3]; without FMD, PD = 6.1 [-0.5, 12.5], 5.3 [1.6, 9.0], 2.5 [2.0, 3.0]). Social determinants may not only influence physical health but also have an impact on psychological well-being. This impact may be altered by levels of emotional support and FMD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Equidade_desigualdade Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Determinantes Sociais da Saúde / Instabilidade Habitacional Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Equidade_desigualdade Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Determinantes Sociais da Saúde / Instabilidade Habitacional Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article