Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying high-risk surgical patients: A study of older adults whose code status changed to Do-Not-Resuscitate.
Kazaure, Hadiza S; Truong, Tracy; Kuchibhatla, Maragatha; Lagoo-Deenadayalan, Sandhya; Wren, Sherry M; Johnson, Kimberly S.
Afiliação
  • Kazaure HS; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Truong T; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Kuchibhatla M; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Lagoo-Deenadayalan S; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Wren SM; Department of Surgery, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Johnson KS; Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical and Clinical Center, Durham, Virginia, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 69(12): 3445-3456, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34331702
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is a paucity of data on older adults (age ≥65 years) undergoing surgery who had an inpatient do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order, and the association between timing of DNR order and outcomes.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective analysis of 1976 older adults in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program geriatric-specific database (2014-2018). Patients were stratified by institution of a DNR order during their surgical admission ("new-DNR" vs. "no-DNR"), and matched by age (±3 years), frailty score (range 0-1), and procedure. The main outcome of interest was occurrence of death or hospice transition (DoH) ≤30 postoperative days; this was analyzed using bivariate and multivariable methods.

RESULTS:

One in 36 older adults had a new-DNR order. After matching, there were 988 new-DNR and 988 no-DNR patients. Median age and frailty score were 82 years and 0.2, respectively. Most underwent orthopedic (47.6%), general (37.6%), and vascular procedures (8.4%). Overall DoH rate ≤30 days was 44.4% for new-DNR versus 4.0% for no-DNR patients (p < 0.001). DoH rate for patients who had DNR orders placed in the preoperative, day of surgery, and postoperative setting was 16.7%, 23.3%, and 64.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, compared to no-DNR patients, those with a new-DNR order had a 28-fold higher adjusted odds of DoH (odds ratio [OR] 28.1, 95% confidence interval 13.0-60.1, p < 0.001); however, odds were 10-fold lower if the DNR order was placed preoperatively (OR 5.8, p = 0.003) versus postoperatively (OR 52.9, p < 0.001). Traditional markers of poor postoperative outcomes such as American Society of Anesthesiologists class and emergency surgery were not independently associated with DoH.

CONCLUSIONS:

An inpatient DNR order was associated with risk of DoH independent of traditional markers of poor surgical outcomes. Further research is needed to understand factors leading to a DNR order that may aid early recognition of high-risk older adults undergoing surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Equidade_desigualdade Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios / Ordens quanto à Conduta (Ética Médica) / Assistência Perioperatória / Pacientes Internados Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Equity_inequality / Ethics Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Am Geriatr Soc Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Equidade_desigualdade Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios / Ordens quanto à Conduta (Ética Médica) / Assistência Perioperatória / Pacientes Internados Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Equity_inequality / Ethics Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Am Geriatr Soc Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos