Rehabilitation for torture survivors: Six evidence myths and their implications for future research.
Torture
; 32(1,2): 227-250, 2022.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35950436
Whilst it is established that torture survivors suffer from complex, multiple and often severe and enduring physical, psychological, social, welfare and many other difficulties; and that rehabilitation as reparation should be holistic, interdisciplinary and specialist, majority of the research on rehabilitation focuses increasingly and almost exclusively on psychological interventions. Further, as-sumptions that this research provides evi-dence of which are effective psychological interventions may underpin and skew ser-vices funded and provided to torture sur-vivors. In this paper we challenge some of those assumptions, and discuss the concep-tual, theoretical, epistemological and meth-odological limitations of this research and implications for future research.
Texto completo:
1
Temas:
ECOS
/
Estado_mercado_regulacao
Bases de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Refugiados
/
Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos
/
Tortura
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Torture
Assunto da revista:
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS
/
REABILITACAO
/
TRAUMATOLOGIA
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article