Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implantable Penile Prosthesis for Erectile Dysfunction: Insurance Coverage in the United States.
Khera, Mohit; Langston, Joshua P; Pollard, Matthew E; Asafu-Adjei, Denise; Edwards, Natalie C; Nitschelm, Krista D; Patel, Mital; Bhattacharyya, Samir K.
Afiliação
  • Khera M; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
  • Langston JP; Urology of Virginia/Eastern Virginia Medical School, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
  • Pollard ME; Posterity Fertility, PC, Denver, Colorado.
  • Asafu-Adjei D; Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.
  • Edwards NC; Health Services Consulting Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts.
  • Nitschelm KD; Health Economics & Market Access, Pelvic Floor & Prosthetic Urology, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
  • Patel M; Global Value & Outcomes, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
  • Bhattacharyya SK; Health Economics & Market Access, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Urol Pract ; 10(5): 501-510, 2023 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37594033
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A manufacturer's benefit verification database was evaluated to ascertain United States health plan insurance coverage for implantable penile prostheses for erectile dysfunction.

METHODS:

All-payer and employer-sponsored health plan benefit verification databases were queried to determine implantable penile prosthesis approval status. For the all-payer analysis, data by payer were available and presented for 2019-2021 to assess approval status varied by payer and over time. For the employer-sponsored health plan analysis, data by payer were available from 2018-2021.

RESULTS:

Benefit verification records for the all-payer database were available for 3,167 patients in 2019, 3,016 in 2020, and 2,837 in 2021. Insurance type was preferred provider organization (27.5%), Medicare Advantage (26.9%), Medicare (15.9%), or point-of-service (10.5%). Most patients were approved or verified for implantable penile prosthesis coverage (79.4% in 2019, 79.6% in 2020, and 78.4% in 2021). Coverage was most extensive for government-based insurance (Medicare 98.7%, Medicare Advantage 97.1%, Tricare 100%, and Veterans Affairs 80.0%) but was also favorable for commercial insurance (75.0%). The most common reason for lack of coverage was employer exclusion; the proportion of patients with no coverage due to exclusion increased from 13.5% in 2019 to 17.5% in 2021. Analyses of the employer-sponsored health plan database (n=3,083 patients) showed that 63.1% of patients were approved or verified for coverage and 34.2% did not have coverage due to health plan exclusions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Approximately 80% of patients had implantable penile prosthesis coverage. Employer exclusion was the most common reason for lagging coverage; rates of employer exclusion increased 29.3% from 2019-2021.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prótese de Pênis / Disfunção Erétil Limite: Aged / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Urol Pract Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prótese de Pênis / Disfunção Erétil Limite: Aged / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Urol Pract Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article