Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low energy contact X-ray brachytherapy for treatment of rectal cancer: a health technology appraisal by Health Technology Wales.
Bennett, Hayley; Rao, Christopher; Batten, Leona; Hasler, Elise; Jarrom, David; Prettyjohns, Matthew; Barrington, Craig; Sun Myint, Arthur.
Afiliação
  • Bennett H; Health Technology Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Rao C; Department of Colorectal Surgery, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, UK.
  • Batten L; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Hasler E; Health Technology Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Jarrom D; Health Technology Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Prettyjohns M; Health Technology Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Barrington C; Health Technology Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Sun Myint A; South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(5): 1053-1058, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467574
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Health Technology Wales sought to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) for early-stage rectal cancer.

METHODS:

Relevant studies were identified through systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus. A cost-utility model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CXB in National Health Service Wales, using results of the Organ Preservation in Early Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPERA) trial. Patient perspectives were obtained through the Papillon Patient Support group and All-Wales Cancer Network.

RESULTS:

The OPERA randomized controlled trial showed that CXB improved complete response and organ preservation rates compared with external-beam boost for people with T2-3b, N0-1, M0 rectal cancer who are fit for surgery. Managing more of this population non-operatively after CXB was estimated to provide 0.2 quality-adjusted life years at an additional cost of £887 per person. CXB was cost effective compared with external-beam boost at a cost of £4463 per quality-adjusted life year gained. This conclusion did not change in scenario analysis and CXB was cost effective in 91% of probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Patients valued receiving clear information on all available options to support their individual treatment choices. The detrimental impact of a stoma on quality of life led some patients to reject the idea that surgery was their only option.

CONCLUSION:

This evidence review and cost-utility analysis indicates that CXB is likely to be clinically and cost effective, as part of a watch and wait strategy for adults fit for surgery. Wider access to CXB is supported by patient testimonies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais / Avaliacao_tecnologia Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica / Braquiterapia / Análise Custo-Benefício / Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais / Avaliacao_tecnologia Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica / Braquiterapia / Análise Custo-Benefício / Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido