Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of disease control rate and safety of sorafenib in targeted therapy for advanced liver cancer.
Zeng, Daolin; Yu, Chunlin; Chen, Shiyao; Zou, Long; Chen, Junjun; Xu, Linlong.
Afiliação
  • Zeng D; Minimally Invasive Intervention Department, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, China.
  • Yu C; Minimally Invasive Intervention Department, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, China.
  • Chen S; Jiangxi Institute of Applied Science and Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330012, China.
  • Zou L; Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Jiangxi Province Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330029, China.
  • Chen J; Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, National Health Commission (NHC), Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330029, China.
  • Xu L; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Jiujiang First People's Hospital, 48 Taling South Road Jiujiang, Jiujiang, Jiangxi, 332000, China. xulinlong0917@163.com.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 93, 2024 Apr 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605359
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The clinical efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced liver cancer (ALC) were evaluated based on transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS:

92 patients with ALC admitted to our hospital from May 2020 to August 2022 were randomly rolled into a control (Ctrl) group and an observation (Obs) group, with 46 patients in each. Patients in the Ctrl group received TACE treatment, while those in the Obs group received sorafenib molecular targeted therapy (SMTT) on the basis of the treatment strategy in the Ctrl group (400 mg/dose, twice daily, followed by a 4-week follow-up observation). Clinical efficacy, disease control rate (DCR), survival time (ST), immune indicators (CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+), and adverse reactions (ARs) (including mild fatigue, liver pain, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), diarrhea, and fever) were compared for patients in different groups after different treatments.

RESULTS:

the DCR in the Obs group (90%) was greatly higher to that in the Ctrl group (78%), showing an obvious difference (P < 0.05). The median ST in the Obs group was obviously longer and the median disease progression time (DPT) was shorter, exhibiting great differences with those in the Ctrl group (P < 0.05). Moreover, no great difference was observed in laboratory indicators between patients in various groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the Obs group exhibited better levels in all indicators. Furthermore, the incidence of ARs in the Obs group was lower and exhibited a sharp difference with that in the Ctrl group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

SMTT had demonstrated good efficacy in patients with ALC, improving the DCR, enhancing the immune response of the body, and reducing the incidence of ARs, thereby promoting the disease outcome. Therefore, it was a treatment method worthy of promotion and application.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quimioembolização Terapêutica / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas / Antineoplásicos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Aspectos_gerais Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quimioembolização Terapêutica / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas / Antineoplásicos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China