Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Critical appraisal of the Colombian clinical practice guide for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of suicidal ideation and/or behaviour (adoption).
Restrepo, Diana; Zapata-Barco, Ana M; Escobar, Juan A; Mejía-Rodríguez, David; Parra-Dunoyer, Daniela; Vargas, Oscar; Vélez, Luis Miguel; Buriticá, Iris T; Vélez, Isabel; Estrada, Sebastián; Rojas-Gualdrón, Diego.
Afiliação
  • Restrepo D; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia. Electronic address: drestrepob@ces.edu.co.
  • Zapata-Barco AM; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Escobar JA; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Mejía-Rodríguez D; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Parra-Dunoyer D; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Vargas O; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Vélez LM; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Buriticá IT; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Vélez I; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Estrada S; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Rojas-Gualdrón D; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 53(1): 85-92, 2024.
Article em En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670823
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Suicide is a complex, global public health problem. The Colombian clinical practice guideline provides relevant input for its prevention, diagnosis and treatment. The objective was to evaluate the methodological quality, credibility and applicability of the Colombian clinical practice guideline for suicidal behaviour.

METHODS:

An academic group of 12 evaluators was established to assess the guide and its recommendations in a standardised way, using the AGREE-II and AGREE-REX instruments. The evaluations were given in the range of 0.0-1.0 with 0.7 as a cut-off point for appropriate quality.

RESULTS:

The global assessment of the AGREE-II was greater than 0.7 in the dimensions "scope and objective" (0.86), "clarity of presentation" (0.89), "applicability" (0.73) and "editorial independence" (0.89). The lowest scores were for "participation of those involved" (0.67) and "rigour in preparation" (0.69). With the AGREE-REX, the results in all dimensions were below 0.70, which indicates lower quality and suitability for use.

CONCLUSIONS:

The adoption process of the Colombian guideline for suicidal behaviour was a rigorous methodological process, while the practice recommendations were valued as of low applicability due to low support in local evidence. It is necessary to strengthen the generation and synthesis of evidence at the national level to give greater support and applicability to the practice recommendations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Avaliacao_tecnologia Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Ideação Suicida Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Colombia Idioma: En / Es Revista: Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Avaliacao_tecnologia Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Ideação Suicida Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Colombia Idioma: En / Es Revista: Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article