Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chronic kidney disease and transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device infection-is there an impact on healthcare utilization, costs, disease progression, and mortality?
Wright, David J; Trucco, María Emilce; Zhou, Jiani; Wolff, Claudia; Holbrook, Reece; Margetta, Jamie; El-Chami, Mikhael F.
Afiliação
  • Wright DJ; Cardiology Division, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
  • Trucco ME; Arrhythmia Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Doctor Josep Trueta and Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain.
  • Zhou J; Cardiac Rhythm Management, Medtronic plc, 8200 Coral Sea Street, MVC71 Mounds View, MN 55112, USA.
  • Wolff C; Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.
  • Holbrook R; Cardiac Rhythm Management, Medtronic plc, 8200 Coral Sea Street, MVC71 Mounds View, MN 55112, USA.
  • Margetta J; Cardiac Rhythm Management, Medtronic plc, 8200 Coral Sea Street, MVC71 Mounds View, MN 55112, USA.
  • El-Chami MF; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Europace ; 26(7)2024 Jul 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890126
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are a burden to hospitals and costly for healthcare systems. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of CIED infections, but its differential impact on healthcare utilization, costs, and outcomes is not known. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

This retrospective analysis used de-identified Medicare Fee-for-Service claims to identify patients implanted with a CIED from July 2016 to December 2020. Outcomes were defined as hospital days and costs within 12 months post-implant, post-infection CKD progression, and mortality. Generalized linear models were used to calculate results by CKD and infection status while controlling for other comorbidities, with differences between cohorts representing the incremental effect associated with CKD. A total of 584 543 patients had a CIED implant, of which 26% had CKD and 1.4% had a device infection. The average total days in hospital for infected patients was 23.5 days with CKD vs. 14.5 days (P < 0.001) without. The average cost of infection was $121 756 with CKD vs. $55 366 without (P < 0.001), leading to an incremental cost associated with CKD of $66 390. Infected patients with CKD were more likely to have septicaemia or severe sepsis than those without CKD (11.0 vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001). After infection, CKD patients were more likely to experience CKD progression (hazard ratio 1.26, P < 0.001) and mortality (hazard ratio 1.89, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Cardiac implantable electronic device infection in patients with CKD was associated with more healthcare utilization, higher cost, greater disease progression, and greater mortality compared to patients without CKD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Financiamentos_gastos Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Desfibriladores Implantáveis / Progressão da Doença / Insuficiência Renal Crônica Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Europace Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Financiamentos_gastos Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Desfibriladores Implantáveis / Progressão da Doença / Insuficiência Renal Crônica Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Europace Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido