Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians.
Song, Jia; Chen, Gang; Khadka, Jyoti; Milte, Rachel; Ratcliffe, Julie.
Afiliação
  • Song J; Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia. Electronic address: jia.song@flinders.edu.au.
  • Chen G; Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Caulfield East, VIC, Australia.
  • Khadka J; Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia; Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Milte R; Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
  • Ratcliffe J; Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Soc Sci Med ; 353: 117054, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38908090
ABSTRACT
The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Avaliacao_economica Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde / Preferência do Paciente Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Soc Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Temas: ECOS / Avaliacao_economica Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde / Preferência do Paciente Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Soc Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article