Analysis of Treatment Strategies and Outcomes in Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Insights From a Multi-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the demographic," clinicopathologic, and prognostic characteristics of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM), as well as the treatment options for the rare and heterogeneous MPeM population. METHODS: A retrospective multi-center observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate patients with MPeM. Due to the heterogeneity of the study population, the study divided them into two main groups in terms of treatments, follow-up periods, and prognostic features. The first group comprised the patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and the second group included the patients with metastatic disease for whom curative intent surgery was not possible. The patients' diagnostic procedures and treatments were identified from medical records. Patients older than 18 years old were included in the study regardless of asbestos exposure. Well-differentiated papillary and multicystic mesothelioma histologic types were not included in the study. RESULTS: The study evaluated 118 patients from five centers. Survival times, prognosis, and treatment responses were analyzed in both groups. The study showed that CRS-HIPEC was associated with longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Perioperative therapy was evaluated in subgroup analyses of this population and shown to provide survival benefits. The patients treated with chemotherapy (metastatic and medically inoperable patients and those for whom complete cytoreduction was not achievable) had a poorer prognosis than the surgery group. The study showed that life expectancy decreased significantly for the patients not suitable to undergo surgery for any reason. CONCLUSIONS: According to data from experienced centers, CRS-HIPEC is a treatment option recognized as effective, cost-effective, and safe, with better OS and PFS , as well as low morbidity and mortality rates similar to those in the literature. In addition, the platinum-pemetrexed combination continues to be an effective and acceptable treatment option for metastatic patients, those who are medically inoperable, and those for whom complete or near-complete cytoreduction is not achievable.

COVID-19 in cancer patients: patient characteristics and outcomes in the post-COVID-19 vaccination period.

Background/aim: It wasaimed herein to investigate coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in cancer patients and compare hematological and solid organ cancer patients in terms of the course and outcome of this disease. Materials and methods: Data from cancer patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection were analyzed retrospectively. Risk factors for poor prognosis and the effect of vaccination on the clinical outcomes of the patients were evaluated. Results: A total of 403 cancer patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 1st, 2021, and November 30th, 2022, were included, of whom 329 (81.6%) had solid and 74 (18.4%) had hematological cancers. Hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates were significantly higher in the hematological cancer patients compared to the solid organ cancer patients (73.0% vs. 35.9%, p< 0.001 and 25.7% vs. 14.0%, p= 0.013, respectively). The COVID-19-related case fatality rate (CFR) was defined as 15.4%, and it was higher in the hematologicalcancer patientsthan inthe solid organ cancer patients (23.0% vs. 13.7%, p= 0.045) and was higher in patients with metastatic/advanced disease compared to the other cancer stages (p< 0.001). In the solid organ cancergroup, hospitalization, ICU admission, and the COVID-19 CFR were higher in patients with respiratory and genitourinary cancers (p< 0.001). A total of 288 (71.8%) patients had receivedCOVID-19 vaccination; 164 (56.94%) had≤2 doses and 124 (43.06%) had≥3 doses. The hospitalization rate was higher in patients with ≤2 doses of vaccine compared to those with ≥3 doses (48.2% vs. 29.8%,p= 0.002). Patients with COVID-19-related death had higher levels of leucocyte, neutrophil, D-dimer, troponin, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and ferritin and lower levels of lymphocyte than the survivors. In the logistic regression analysis,the risk of COVID-19-related mortality was higher in the hematological cancer patients(OR:1.726), those who were male (OR:1.757), and with the Pre-Delta/Delta variants (OR:1.817). Conclusion: This study revealed that there is an increased risk of COVID-19-related serious events (hospitalization, ICU admission, or death) in patients with hematological cancerscompared with those who have solid organ cancers. It wasalso shown that receiving ≥3 doses of COVID-19 vaccine is more protective against severe illness and the need for hospitalization than ≤2 doses.

Examination of family caregivers of advanced cancer patients within the scope of the cancer family caregiving experience model: An embedded mixed-methods design.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the stressors and contextual factors that affect the quality of life (QoL) of caregivers of advanced cancer patients and to address their caregiving experiences. METHODS: The study had an embedded mixed-methods design and was conducted in the medical oncology unit of a training and research hospital in Turkey. In the quantitative phase, 125 patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers were included. In the qualitative phase, 21 family caregivers were included. The analysis of quantitative data was carried out using SPSS 25.0 statistical program, and qualitative data were carried out using Collaizi's seven-step descriptive analysis approach. QoL was determined as the dependent variable and evaluated with Caregiver QoL Index-Cancer (CQOLC). RESULTS: The symptoms, care dependency of patients, and preparedness to the care of caregivers showed a direct impact on the CQOLC. Income level, employment status, and daily caregiving hours demonstrated a direct effect on the CQOLC. Four themes emerged from the interviews: Understanding the dynamics of the caregiving process, losing control of life during the caregiving process, limitation of socio-economic freedom in the caregiving process, and the effort to hold on to life in the caregiving process. CONCLUSION: The cancer family caregiving experience model is a useful model for evaluating the QoL of caregivers from a multidimensional perspective. Health care professionals should not forget that the QoL of family caregivers should be evaluated in multiple ways, and education programmes for family members should be structured.

Clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with solid tumors: Turkish National Registry Data.

We present demographic, clinical, laboratory characteristics and outcomes of the patients with solid malignancies and novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) collected from the National COVID-19 Registry of Turkey. A total of 1523 patients with a current or past diagnosis of solid tumors and diagnosed with COVID-19 (confirmed with PCR) between 11 March and 20 May 2020 were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Median age was 61 (range: 18-94), and 752 (49%) were male. The most common types of cancers were breast (19.8%), prostate (10.9%) and colorectal cancer (10.8%). 65% of the patients had at least one comorbidity. At least one COVID-19-directed therapy was given in 73% of the patients.. Hospitalization rate of the patients was 56.6% and intensive care unit admission rate was 11.4%. Seventy-seven (5.1%) patients died within 30 days of diagnosis. The first multivariate model which included only the demographic and clinical characteristics showed older age, male gender and presence of diabetes and receipt of cytotoxic therapy to be associated with increased 30-day mortality, while breast and prostate cancer diagnoses were associated with lower 30-day mortality. In the second set, we further included laboratory parameters. The presence of leukocytosis (OR 6.7, 95% CI 3.3-13.7, P < .001), lymphocytopenia (OR 3,1, 95% CI 1,6-6,1, P = .001) and thrombocytopenia (OR 3,4 95% CI 1,5-8,1, P = .005) were found to be associated with increased 30-day mortality. Relatively lower mortality compared to Western countries and China mainly results from differences in baseline risk factors but may also implicate the importance of intensive supportive care.

Immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac vaccine in patients with cancer receiving active systemic therapy.

Aim: To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac vaccine in patients with cancer receiving active systemic therapy. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted with 47 patients receiving active systemic therapy for cancer. CoronaVac was administered as two doses (3 µg/day) on days 0 and 28. Antibody level higher than 1 IU/ml was defined as 'immunogenicity.' Results: The immunogenicity rate was 63.8% (30/47) in the entire patient group, 59.5% (25/42) in those receiving at least one cytotoxic drug and 100% (five of five) in those receiving monoclonal antibody or immunotherapy alone. Age was an independent predictive factor for immunogenicity (odds ratio: 0.830; p = 0.043). Conclusion: More than half of cancer patients receiving active systemic therapy developed immunogenicity.

"Swords and Shields" against COVID-19 for patients with cancer at "clean" and "pandemic" hospitals: are we ready for the second wave?

PURPOSE: COVID-19 will continue to disrupt the diagnosis-treatment process of cancer patients. Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Hospital has been considered as a 'non-pandemic' center ('clean') in Ankara, the capital city of Turkey. The other state hospitals that also take care of cancer patients in Ankara were defined as 'pandemic' centers. This study aimed to evaluate hospital admission changes and the precautionary measures in clean and pandemic centers during the pandemic. The effect of these measures and changes on COVID-19 spreading among cancer patients was also evaluated. METHODS: The patients admitted to the medical oncology follow-up, new diagnosis, or chemotherapy (CT) outpatient clinics during the first quarter of pandemic period (March 15-June 1, 2020) of each center were determined and compared with the admissions of the same frame of previous year (March 15-June 1, 2019). COVID-19 PCR test results in clean and pandemic centers were compared with each other. Telemedicine was preffered in the clean hospital to keep on follow-up of the cancer patients as 'noninfected'. RESULTS: In the clean hospital, COVID-19-infected patients that needed to be hospitalized were referred to pandemic hospitals. COVID-19 test positivity rate was eight-fold higher for outpatient clinic admissions in pandemic hospitals (p < 0.001). The number of patients admitted new diagnosis outpatient clinics in both clean and pandemic hospitals decreased significantly during the pandemic compared with the previous year. CONCLUSION: We consider that local strategic modifications and defining 'clean' hospital model during infectious pandemic may contribute to protect and treat cancer patients during pandemic.

Can Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Create a New Perspective for the IMDC Scoring System in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate impact of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) on prognosis and survival within the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score groups. METHODS: The records of 187 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were reviewed retrospectively. The SII was calculated as follows: SII = Neutrophil × Platelet/Lymphocyte. The patients were categorized into 2 groups based on a median SII of 730 (×109 per 1 L) as SII low (<730) and SII high (≥730). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and a Cox regression model was utilized to determine independent predictors of survival. RESULTS: The median age was 61 years (range: 34-86 years). Kaplan-Meier tests revealed significant differences in survival between the SII-low and SII-high levels (27.0 vs. 12.0 months, respectively, p < 0.001). The Cox regression model revealed that SII was an independent prognostic factor. The implementation of the log-rank test in the IMDC groups according to the SII level provided the distinction of survival in the favorable group (SII low 49.0 months vs. SII high 11.0 months, p < 0.001), in the intermediate group (SII low 26.0 vs. SII high 15.0 months, p = 0.007), and in the poor group (SII low 19.0 vs. SII high 6.0 months, p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: The SII was an independent prognostic factor and provided significant differences in survival for the favorable, intermediate, and poor IMDC groups. Thus, the SII added to the IMDC score may be clinically beneficial in predicting survival.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of adult's Ewing sarcoma family of tumors: single center experience.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Aim of the study was to investigate the demographics of Ewing sarcoma family of tumours (ESTF) patients, treatment alternatives, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors for survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 39 patients with ESFT who were admitted to our institute between September 2008 and September 2012. RESULTS: The patients included 32 (82.1%) males and seven (17.9%) females of median age 24 (range, 18-66) years. Among the 27 patients with a primary osseous localization, 17 (43.5%) had a central axis localization. Fifteen patients (38.5%) had metastases at the time of diagnosis. Patients were followed up for a median period of 18 (range, 2-134) months. The median event-free survival (EFS) was 23 (range, 1-64) months, and the 1- and 4-year EFS were 60% and 48%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 91 (range, 1-188) months, and the 1- and 4-year OS were 78% and 54%, respectively. Gender, age, primary tumor site, and local treatment modalities, either alone or in combination, did not have a significant effect on OS (p = 0.210, p = 0.617, p = 0.644, and p = 0.417, respectively). In contrast, osseous site of peripheral localization, limited stage, and metastasis to the bone significantly affected OS (p = 0.015, p < 0.001, and p = 0.042, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ESFTs are aggressive tumors with a high rate of relapse and metastatic potential. Patients with peripheral bone involvement and limited stage had a good prognosis. Appropriate surgical resection, radiotherapy, and aggressive chemotherapy regimens are recommended.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Real-World Study.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a promising approach for managing locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), aiming to enhance resectability, increase pathological complete response (pCR), improve treatment compliance, survival, and sphincter preservation. This study compares the clinical outcomes of TNT, with either induction or consolidation chemotherapy, to those of the standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In this retrospective multi-institutional study, patients with stage II-III LARC who underwent CRT or TNT from seven oncology centers between 2021 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The TNT group was categorized into induction or consolidation groups based on the sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Clinical and pathological data and treatment outcomes, including pCR, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS), were analyzed. Among the 276 patients, 105 received CRT and 171 underwent TNT. The TNT group showed significantly higher pCR (21.8% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001) and lower lymphatic (26.3% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.009), vascular (15.8% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.002), and perineural invasion rates (20.3% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, 16.9% of TNT patients opted for non-operative management (NOM), compared to 0.9% in the CRT group (p < 0.001). The median interval between the end of radiotherapy and surgery was longer in the TNT group (17.6 weeks vs. 8.8 weeks, p < 0.001). The 3-year EFS was 58.3% for CRT and 71.1% for TNT (p = 0.06). TNT is associated with higher pCR, lower lymphatic and vascular invasion rates, and higher rates of NOM compared to CRT. This supports the use of TNT as a viable treatment strategy for LARC, offering potential benefits in quality of life.

The prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of treatment sequencing.

The prognosis of patients with advanced HCC can vary widely depending on factors such as the stage of the cancer, the patient's overall health, and treatment regimens. This study aimed to investigate survival outcomes and associated factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this retrospective study, data from 23 medical oncology clinics were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) values were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors associated with survival which were identified in univariate analysis were subsequently evaluated in a multivariate Cox-regression survival analysis was conducted using the backward stepwise (Conditional LR) method to determine the independent predictors of PFS and OS. Of 280 patients, 131 received chemotherapy and 142 received sorafenib, 6 received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 1 received nivolumab for first-line setting. The median follow-up time was 30.4 (95%CI 27.1-33.6) months. For-first line, median PFS was 3.1 (95%CI2.7-3.5) months, and it was significantly longer in patients who received sorafenib or atezolizumab-bevacizumab or nivolumab (PFS 5.8 (95%CI 4.2-7.5) than in those received chemotherapy (PFS 2.1 (95%CI 1.9-2.3) in the first-line setting (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that male gender (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.53-4.94, p = 0.01), poor ECOG performance score (HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.10-3.21, p = 0.02), higher baseline AFP level (HR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.54-3.67, p < 0.001) and upfront sorafenib treatment (HR,0.38; 95% CI: 0.23-0.62, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. The median OS was 13.2 (95%CI 11.1-15.2) months. It was significantly longer in patients who received sorafenib or atezolizumab-bevacizumab or nivolumab in the first-line setting followed by TKIs (sorafenib or regorafenib, OS 18.6 (95%CI 13.8-23.5)) compared to those who received chemotherapy (OS 10.3 (95%CI 6.6-14.1)) in the first-line setting. The multivariate analysis revealed that upfront chemotherapy treatment approach, male gender (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.07-2.94, p = 0.02), poor ECOG performance score (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.24-3.09, p = 0.004) and Child-Pugh score, presence of extrahepatic disease (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.09-2.18, p = 0.01), and higher baseline AFP value (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.03-2.19, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Additionally, regarding of treatment sequence, upfront sorafenib followed by regorafenib showed a significantly lower risk of mortality (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25-0.66, p < 0.001). Sorafenib followed by regorafenib treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality rather than upfront sorafenib followed by BSC group or upfront chemotherapy followed by TKIs. These findings underscore the importance of the optimal treatment sequences to improve survival in patients with advanced HCC.

Isolated ovarian metastasis of gastric cancer: Krukenberg tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer, one of the most common cancers in the world, rarely metastasizes to the ovaries. Ovarian metastases of gastric signet ring cell cancer (SRCC) are referred to as Krukenberg tumors and account for 1-2% of all ovarian cancers. Here, we analyze the characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of patients with Krukenberg tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the demographic characteristics, treatment modalities, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of patients who were diagnosed with Krukenberg tumors of gastric cancer origin and who underwent treatment and follow-up between January 2005 and January 2012 in the Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital. RESULTS: Among 1755 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer between January 2005 and January 2012, eight patients (0.45%) with histopathologically identified Krukenberg tumors were enrolled. The median age of the eight patients was 42.2 years (range, 32-69 years). Two (25%) of the patients were stage 3A, two (25%) were stage 3C, and four (50%) were stage 4 at the time of diagnosis. The median PFS was 13.2 months (1-25 months), the median OS after the original diagnosis was 16.7 months (1-41 months), and the median OS after ovarian metastasis was 3.6 months (1-10 months). DISCUSSION: Krukenberg tumors were seen particularly in young patients and more frequently during the premenopausal period. The prognosis was poor. When only the ovaries were affected, metastasectomy prolonged the survival time.

Assessment of general characteristics of patients with primary metastatic breast carcinoma: single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease. Several subgroups have been identified, according to the clinical presentation and radiographic, pathological, biological, and molecular characteristics of the tumor. Intrinsic genetic heterogeneity may be responsible for these differences. To date, little is known about the clinical features and outcome of patients with primary metastatic BC (PMBC) defined as those presenting with stage IV disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between September 2007 and May 2011, BC patients who were admitted to a clinic were assessed. Patients with PMBC were included in this retrospective analysis. The patients' demographic characteristics, treatment schedules, and survival data were recorded. RESULTS: Of 2478 BC patients, 102 (4.1%) with PMBC were included in the analysis. The median age of the patients was 50 (26-90) years. Only four patients (3.9%) had previously undergone mammography. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30 and 66 months, respectively. The PFS and OS were unaffected by age, menopausal status, ECOG, histology, or tumor grade. Both PFS and OS were affected by HR status (log rank p = 0.006, log rank p = 0.04), HER2 status (p = 0.001, p = 0.005), site of metastasis (p = 0.01, p = 0.04), radiotherapy (p = 0.04, OS p = 0.03), and bisphosphonate treatment (p = 0.02, p = 0.006). PFS was greater in the hormone therapy group (43 months, p = 0.03) while OS was greater in the patients that received chemotherapy (76 months, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Mammography should be given greater emphasis, considering its importance in the prevention of PMBC. As a treatment option for bone and soft tissue metastatic PMBC patients, hormone therapy should be effective as a first-line treatment.

Adjuvant Capecitabine after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of complete pathological response (pCR) on prognosis in patients with axillary lymph node-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the efficiency of adjuvant capecitabine. STUDY DESIGN: Analytical study. Place and Duration of the Study: University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, between March 2015 and December 2021. METHODOLOGY: The study included 92 patients with TNBC with enlarged axillary lymph nodes and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patients were classified as those with and without postoperative pCR and compared in terms of survival. Subsequently, the patients who did not achieve pCR were classified as receiving and not receiving adjuvant capecitabine and were compared for DFS (disease-free survival) and OS (overall survival). Parameters that showed statistical significance were re-evaluated with Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The 5-year DFS rate was 84.3% in those who achieved pCR, while it was 55.1% in those who did not (p=0.026). The 5-year OS rate was 82.8% in the pCR arm, while it was 51.0% in the non-pCR arm (p=0.070). The 5-year DFS rate was 66.3% in adjuvant capecitabine-receiving patients, while it was 40.8% in the non-capecitabine arm (HR=0.40, p=0.031). The 5-year OS rate was 68.9% in adjuvant capecitabine-receiving patients, while it was 29.6% in the non-capecitabine arm (HR= 0.40, p=0.062).  Conclusion: Obtaining pCR following NAC in a locally advanced TNBC is an independent prognostic marker for DFS and OS. In the presence of residual disease, improvement in DFS and OS with adjuvant capecitabine was demonstrated by the real-life data. KEY WORDS: Triple-negative breast cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Capecitabine, Survival.

GLIM criteria as a valid tool for nutrition assessment and mortality prediction in treatment-naïve patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Clinical care of patients with cancer mostly focuses on medical management with less attention on disease-related malnutrition. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) released new criteria for diagnosing malnutrition, but the validation of these criteria in treatment-naïve patients with cancer is not well documented. This study aimed to investigate the application of the GLIM criteria in nutrition assessment and mortality prediction in treatment-naïve patients with cancer. METHODS: A total of 267 patients newly diagnosed with different types of cancer were enrolled. Nutrition status was assessed with the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) at outpatient clinic admission during the data collection period. Furthermore, after the GLIM criteria publication, nutrition status was assessed retrospectively using the GLIM criteria in the same cohort to assess validity. The agreement between the tools was calculated using kappa statistics, and the association of malnutrition according to each tool and mortality was analyzed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 58.06 ± 12.6 years, and 42.7% were women. The prevalence of malnutrition was 60.3% with GLIM criteria and 53.6% with PG-SGA. Agreement between tools was moderate (κ = 0.483, P < 0.001). During a median follow-up period of 23.6 months, 99 deaths occurred. Both GLIM-defined and PG-SGA-defined malnutrition was independently associated with 2-year mortality after adjusting for age, sex, presence of comorbidities, and stage of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the validation of GLIM in diagnosing malnutrition and predicting 2-year mortality among treatment-naïve patients with cancer.

Clinicopathological Features and First-Line Treatment Outcomes of Geriatric Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study.

Introduction The geriatric patient population diagnosed with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is underrepresented in clinical studies. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, first-line treatment patterns and treatment outcomes of patients aged 65 years or older with extensive stage SCLC. Material and methods In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, patients aged 65 years or older, diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC, between January 2009 and December 2021 were included. Patients who were under 65 years of age at the time of diagnosis and did not develop progression after curative treatment and patients with a second malignancy were excluded from the study. The clinicopathological characteristics, first-line treatment patterns and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Results A total of 132 patients were included in the study. The median age was 70 years (range:65-91), and 118 (89.4%) patients were male. There were 77 (58.3%) patients with eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-1. There were 26 (19.7%) patients in the limited stage disease and 106 (80.3%) patients in the extensive stage disease at the time of diagnosis. First-line chemotherapy was given to 86 (65.2%) patients. Of the patients who could not receive treatment, 18 patients (13.6%) due to patient refusal, and 28 patients (21.2%) due to comorbid diseases and poor performance status with organ dysfunctions. The most common treatment regimen used as first-line treatment was cisplatin+etoposide (n=47, 54.7%), and followed by carboplatin+etoposide (n=39, 45.3%). First-line chemotherapy responses were complete response in 4 (4.7%) patients, partial response in 35 (40.7%) patients, stable disease in 13 (15.1%) patients, and progressive disease in 34 (39.5%) patients. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events was neutropenia in 33 (38.4%) patients. Forty nine patients (57.0%) completed the planned first-line treatment. The mPFS was 6.1 months and the mOS was 8.2 months with first-line treatment. We found that ECOG PS status was the most important negative prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. There was no difference between carboplatin+etoposide and cisplatin+etoposide regimens in terms of PFS, OS, adverse events and treatment compliance. Conclusion Thus, it may be an appropriate approach not to give up chemotherapy treatment easily in elderly patients with a diagnosis of extensive stage SCLC. It should be kept in mind that finding factors that might affect the prognosis and tailoring the tretment precisely on case-by-case basis in geriatric cancer patients have an impact on survival.

Uncommon variants detected via hereditary cancer panel and suggestions for genetic counseling.

OBJECTIVE: Hereditary cancer syndromes constitute 5-10% of all cancers. The development of next-generation sequencing technologies has made it possible to examine many hereditary cancer syndrome-causing genes in a single panel. This study's goal was to describe the prevalence and the variant spectrum using NGS in individuals who were thought to have a hereditary predisposition for cancer. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Analysis was performed for 1254 who were thought to have a familial predisposition for cancer. We excluded 46 patients who were carrying BRCA1/2 variants in this study, for focusing on the rare gene mutations. Sequencing was performed using the Sophia Hereditary Cancer Solution v1.1 Panel and the Qiagen Large Hereditary Cancer Panel. The Illumina MiSeq system was used for the sequencing procedure. The software used for the data analyses was Sophia DDM and QIAGEN Clinical Insight (QCITM) Analyze. The resulting genomic changes were classified according to the current guidelines of ACMG/AMP. RESULTS: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were detected in 172 (13.7%) of 1254 patients. After excluding the 46 BRCA1/2-positive patients, among the remaining 126 patients; there were 60 (4.8%) breast cancer, 33 (2.6%) colorectal cancer, 9 (0.7%) ovarian cancer, 5 (0.4%) endometrium cancer, 5 (0.4%) stomach cancer, 3 (0.2%) prostate cancer patients. The most altered genes were MUTYH in 27 (2.1%) patients, MMR genes (MLH1, MSH6, MSH, MSH2, PMS2 and EPCAM) in 26 (2%) patients, and ATM in 25 (2%) patients. We also examined the genotype-phenotype correlation in rare variants. Additionally, we identified 11 novel variations. CONCLUSION: This study provided significant information regarding rare variants observed in the Turkish population because it was carried out with a large patient group. Personalized treatment options and genetic counseling for the patients are therefore made facilitated.

Retrospective Evaluation of the Efficacy of Gemcitabine-Based Therapies After FOLFIRINOX Failure in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer, Multi-Center Real-Life Data.

OBJECTIVE: Combination therapies such as FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (GnP) are recommended for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine-based second-line therapies in patients whose disease progressed on FOLFIRINOX. METHOD: Patients diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer in 7 tertiary hospitals in Turkey were included. Patients were divided into 3 different groups according to their treatment regimens: GnP, gemcitabine doublet (gemcitabine-cisplatin or gemcitabine-capecitabine), and gemcitabine monotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included in the study. In the second-line treatment, 65% of patients were given GnP, 20% were given gemcitabine doublet, and 15% were given gemcitabine monotherapy. The median exposure of the patients to gemcitabine-based therapy was 3 cycles, whereas the median progression-free survival was calculated as 3.4 months. The median overall survival for patients who received GnP was 4.6 months, 6.4 months for patients who received gemcitabine doublet therapy, and 3.7 months for patients who received gemcitabine monotherapy ( P = 0.248). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, it has been shown that gemcitabine-based second-line treatments contribute to survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, there was no difference in efficacy between gemcitabine monotherapy or combination treatments.

Concomitant Use of Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine and Imatinib in a Patient of CML and Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Imatinib is a CYP3A4 inhibitor, while ado-trastuzumab is a CYP3A4 substrate. Imatinib can interact with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and can increase T-DM1 concentrations, leading to T-DM1-related toxicity. There is no trial or case report in the literature on the concomitant use of Imatinib and T-DM1. Herein, we report a case in which T-DM1 was used effectively with imatinib in a patient with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and metastatic Her-2-positive breast cancer. A 37-year female using imatinib for CML was diagnosed with breast cancer and a modified radical mastectomy was performed. Skin metastasis occurred within one year after adjuvant therapy was completed. Lung metastasis occurred after Trastuzumab + vinorelbine treatment and T-DM1 and imatinib were given to the patient. No side effects were observed except for grade 1 fatigue. This case report is the first to report the concomitant use of T-DM1 and imatinib in a patient of CML and metastatic breast cancer. Key Words: Imatinib, Ado-trastuzumab emtansine, Breast cancer, Chronic myeloid leukaemia.