Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
J Med Liban ; 63(2): 87-93, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26164977

ABSTRACT

Vitamin D is well known for its effects on bone metabolism, calcium and phosphorus homeostasis. Recently, a worldwide focus has been made on the extraskeletal effects of this liposoluble vitamin. The New York Times even called it the "wonder drug". Vitamin D is a liposoluble vitamin and acts via an intracellular receptor. This article reviews the extra-skeletal effects of vitamin D focusing on cardiovascular effects, regulation of glucose, antitumoral properties, and effect on the immune system and the skeletal muscle and attempts to offer possible molecular explanations to these effects.


Subject(s)
Vitamin D Deficiency/complications , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Autoimmune Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Humans , Hypertension/prevention & control , Muscle Weakness/etiology , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Obesity/blood , Risk Factors , Vitamin D/blood
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(4): e125-e141, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195892

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fractureamong people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, andsubcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficaciousandcanreduce risk of future fracture.Patientsneededucation,however, about thebenefitsandrisks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive butmay be beneficial for selected patients at high risk.Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the risk for second fractures is highest in the earlypost-fractureperiod,prompt treatment is recommended.Adequate dietary or supplemental vitaminDand calciumintake shouldbe assured. Individuals beingtreatedfor osteoporosis shouldbe reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, includingvia patienteducationabout osteoporosisandfracturesandmonitoringfor adverse treatment effects.Patients shouldbestronglyencouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol inmoderation atmost, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease).


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Bone Diseases, Metabolic , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Consensus , Diphosphonates , Humans , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control
3.
J Bone Miner Res ; 35(1): 36-52, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31538675

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fracture among people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, and subcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficacious and can reduce risk of future fracture. Patients need education, however, about the benefits and risks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive but may be beneficial for selected patients at high risk. Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the risk for second fractures is highest in the early post-fracture period, prompt treatment is recommended. Adequate dietary or supplemental vitamin D and calcium intake should be assured. Individuals being treated for osteoporosis should be reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, including via patient education about osteoporosis and fractures and monitoring for adverse treatment effects. Patients should be strongly encouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol in moderation at most, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease). © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Alendronate , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Consensus , Diphosphonates , Humans , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Risedronic Acid
7.
Arch Osteoporos ; 14(1): 20, 2019 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30761432

ABSTRACT

The first step to achieve a world without fragility fractures is to devise a strategic plan to improve research and planning, and assisting member states to acquire the required financial, technical, and other resources. This article aims to outline the first strategic plan devised for the Middle East and North Africa region proposed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation's (IOF) Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Regional Advisory Council (RAC). PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is no exception in this rising tide of non-communicable diseases, not only sharing common risk factors but also contributing substantially to a heavy social and economic burden on society. During the past decade and after the establishment of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), a goal-directed movement has started to achieve a world without fragility fractures. In order to achieve this goal, regional councils were formed to maximize the effectiveness of national osteoporosis societies in raising awareness of effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: The first step to achieve this goal is to devise a strategic plan to improve the research and planning, assisting all member states to acquire the financial, technical, and other resources needed in order to achieve a world-class program in the fight against osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: This article therefore aims to outline the first strategic plan devised by the IOF's MENA RAC for the Middle East and North Africa region.


Subject(s)
Global Health , Health Planning , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Africa, Northern , Humans , Middle East
8.
Mediterr J Rheumatol ; 28(1): 27-32, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32185251

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis is the most common bone disease in humans. With its related fragility fracture, it represents a major public health problem in our region, with a significant medical and socio-economic burden. The high prevalence rate of vitamin D deficiency, the increase in life expectancy, the low socioeconomic level and the significant restriction to access to health care in some countries represent the major causes for the increasing prevalence of osteoporosis and incidence of fragility fractures in the Arabic countries. Bone mineral density (BMD) assessment is the gold standard to diagnose osteoporosis. However, a clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis may be made in the presence of a fragility fracture, without BMD measurement. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the preferred method for screening bone mineral density. For screening site of measurement, DXA of hip and spine is suggested. BMD assessment is recommended in all women 65 years of age and older and men 70 and older regardless of risk factors. Younger subjects with clinical risk factors and persons with clinical evidence of osteoporosis or diseases leading to osteoporosis should also be screened. These guidelines are aimed to provide to health care professionals in the region of an updated process for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. It includes risk factors for osteoporosis and the indications for screening, diagnosis of osteoporosis, treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal and premenopausal women, and men; in addition to prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL