Efficacy of daily and monthly high-dose calciferol in vitamin D-deficient nulliparous and lactating women.

BACKGROUND: We previously found a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and low medication regimen compliance in Arab and East Indian women residing in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The appropriate dosing regimen for improving vitamin D status in this population is not known. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the efficacy of daily and monthly supplementation with vitamin D2, the only high-dose calciferol available in the UAE, in lactating and nulliparous women. DESIGN: Healthy lactating (n = 90) and nulliparous (n = 88) women were randomly assigned to consume 2000 IU vitamin D2/d or 60,000 IU vitamin D2/mo for 3 mo. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay at baseline and every month. RESULTS: Most women had vitamin D deficiency [ie, 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/L] at study entry. Mean +/- SD 25(OH)D concentrations at 3 mo were significantly higher than baseline in both lactating (39.8 +/- 12.4 and 25.2 +/- 10.7 nmol/L, respectively) and nulliparous (40.4 +/- 23.4 and 19.3 +/- 12.2 nmol/L, respectively) women (P < 0.001 for both). In total, vitamin D supplementation was effective in achieving serum 25(OH)D concentrations of >or=50 nmol/L in 21 (30%) of 71 women at endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Oral vitamin D2 supplementation with 2000 IU/d or 60,000 IU/mo for 3 mo was safe, and it increased serum 25(OH)D concentrations significantly; however, only a small proportion of the women studied achieved concentrations of >or=50 nmol/L. This suggests that, when sunlight exposure is limited, doses of vitamin D2 higher than those currently studied may be needed. Monthly dosing appears to be a safe and effective alternative to daily dosing.

Impact of Ramadan fasting on glucose levels in women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated with diet alone or diet plus metformin: a continuous glucose monitoring study.

OBJECTIVE: Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are categorized as at high risk for adverse events during Ramadan fasting. However, this is largely based on clinical opinion. In this study, we shed some light on what happens to glucose levels during Ramadan fasting. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study. A total of 32 patients with GDM were recruited; 10 patients, treated with diet only (group 1), to observe their glucose levels before fasting and 22 patients who insisted on fasting the month of Ramadan, 13 treated with diet only (group 2) and nine treated with diet plus metformin 500 mg twice daily (group 3), to evaluate their glucose levels during fasting. Interstitial glucose was monitored in all by using the iPro2 Professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system. RESULTS: Mean glucose level was 116±21 mg/dL (6.16±1.16 mmol/L), 106±9 mg/dL (5.88±0.49 mmol/L) and 99±7 mg/dL (5.49±0.34 mmol/L) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Patients in group 1 had the lowest rate of hypoglycemia (50%), followed by patients in group 2 (60%), whereas patients in group 3 had the highest rate of hypoglycemia (78%). CONCLUSIONS: CGM data indicates that Ramadan fasting in women with GDM treated with diet alone or with diet plus metformin was associated with lower mean glucose levels and higher rates of hypoglycemia when compared with non-fasting glucose levels. Women with GDM should be advised against fasting during Ramadan until further data is available.