KIT expression in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: comparative immunohistochemical analysis of KIT expression in different renal cell neoplasms.

The overexpression of c-Kit in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) has been described by comparative gene expression analyses and has been proposed as a possible specific hallmark of this neoplasm. The aim of our study was to establish its immunohistochemical expression in a large series of ChRCC and to compare it with other renal neoplasms. In our study, immunohistochemical characterization of KIT was performed in 87 renal neoplasms including 25 cases of ChRCC, 13 cases of renal oncocytoma, and 39 renal cell carcinomas (21 cases of conventional RCC [CRCC], 8 cases of CRCC with granular cell differentiation, and 10 cases of papillary RCC [PRCC]). Eighty-eight percent ChRCC and 71% oncocytomas showed immunohistochemical expression of KIT, while the other types of RCC studied were all negative. The meaning of immunohistochemical expression of KIT in ChRCC and oncocytomas is still unknown, but its immunohistochemical staining appears to be useful in distinguishing ChRCC from PRCC, CRCC, and its granular cell variant. Moreover, our findings support current models that consider that there is a histopathogenic relationship between oncocytoma and ChRCC. Finally, it should be determined whether KIT plays a role in the tumorigenesis of ChRCC and oncocytoma and whether targeted therapy with STI-571, an inhibitor of KIT, could be effective in exceptional cases of ChRCC with metastatic extension or recurrence.

C-kit expression in sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: potential therapy with imatinib.

PURPOSE: Sarcomatoid (S) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an uncommon subtype of RCC with a poor prognosis because of its local aggressiveness and high metastatic rate. Currently, there is no specific, effective treatment for it. A relatively nontoxic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib (STI-571) has been approved as a target therapy in neoplasms that express c-Kit. We investigated c-Kit expression in this type of tumor, which to our knowledge has not been previously described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 215 cases of RCC diagnosed at our department from 1995 to 2002. Of the cases 20 (9.3%) were SRCC. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded material was available in 19 cases. We performed immunohistochemical staining against c-Kit using rabbit polyclonal antihuman antibody (CD117, Dako Corp., Carpinteria, California), diluted 1:100. Its expression was evaluated in the epithelial and the spindle components. RESULTS: Two of the 20 SRCC cases (10%) showed no epithelial differentiation. The epithelial component was conventional RCC in 10 cases (50%), papillary RCC in 5 (25%) and chromophobe RCC in 3 (15%). A total of 16 cases (80%) presented at an advanced stage at diagnosis, namely T3 or T4 and/or metastatic disease. Immunohistochemical study showed positivity in the epithelial component only in the 3 chromophobe SRCCs. The sarcomatoid component was positive for c-Kit in 18 cases (94.7%). CONCLUSIONS: High c-Kit expression in SRCC in our series and the existence of a target therapy, imatinib (STI-571), against cells that express this receptor open the possibility of using this treatment for these tumors, especially in cases of advanced disease.