COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity Reduces Hospitalization and Critical Care Needs Related to COVID-19: a USIDNET Report.

BACKGROUND: The CDC and ACIP recommend COVID-19 vaccination for patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Not much is known about vaccine safety in IEI, and whether vaccination attenuates infection severity in IEI. OBJECTIVE: To estimate COVID-19 vaccination safety and examine effect on outcomes in patients with IEI. METHODS: We built a secure registry database in conjunction with the US Immunodeficiency Network to examine vaccination frequency and indicators of safety and effectiveness in IEI patients. The registry opened on January 1, 2022, and closed on August 19, 2022. RESULTS: Physicians entered data on 1245 patients from 24 countries. The most common diagnoses were antibody deficiencies (63.7%). At least one COVID-19 vaccine was administered to 806 patients (64.7%), and 216 patients received vaccination prior to the development of COVID-19. The most common vaccines administered were mRNA-based (84.0%). Seventeen patients were reported to seek outpatient clinic or emergency room care for a vaccine-related complication, and one patient was hospitalized for symptomatic anemia. Eight hundred twenty-three patients (66.1%) experienced COVID-19 infection. Of these, 156 patients required hospitalization (19.0%), 47 required ICU care (5.7%), and 28 died (3.4%). Rates of hospitalization (9.3% versus 24.4%, p < 0.001), ICU admission (2.8% versus 7.6%, p = 0.013), and death (2.3% versus 4.3%, p = 0.202) in patients who had COVID-19 were lower in patients who received vaccination prior to infection. In adjusted logistic regression analysis, not having at least one COVID-19 vaccine significantly increased the odds of hospitalization and ICU admission. CONCLUSION: Vaccination for COVID-19 in the IEI population appears safe and attenuates COVID-19 severity.

Late-Onset Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome in a Costa Rican Woman.

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) is a primary immune regulatory disorder (PIRD). This disease usually develops during childhood. However, atypically, some cases may have their onset in adulthood. We report the case of a 44-year-old woman with a history of autoimmune hemolytic anemia at 33 years old. The patient presented due to asthenia and a large, painful lymph node in the left axillary region for the last four months. Enlargement of the axillary and inguinal lymph nodes was found by mammography, breast, and abdominal ultrasounds. An excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph node conglomerate did not document immunophenotypical alterations of T or B lymphocytes but showed progressive transformation of germinal centers with reactive follicular hyperplasia. The lymph node cytometry did not show a malignant phenotype. The immunological work-up documented IgG and IgA hypergammaglobulinemia and slightly decreased IgM; the B cell immunophenotype documented a slight increase in CD21low B cells and decreased memory B cells. The blood count was normal. The T cell compartment evidenced 27% CD3+/αß+/γδ-/CD4-/CD8- of the total T CD3+ cells and 15% of the total lymphocytes. A pathogenic heterozygous variant in the FAS gene, exon 9, c.785T>A (p.Ile262Asn), was documented. This variant has not been previously described. This case highlights the importance of considering the diagnosis of ALPS even in adulthood. Genetic conditions such as incomplete penetrance or variable expressivity that depend on factors that are not entirely clear in ALPS, such as epigenetics and environmental factors, among others, could generate the onset of this disease in adulthood in a smaller number of patients.

[Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19, the same or different entities?] / Linfohistiocitosis hemofagocítica secundaria y síndrome de liberación de citoquinas en COVID-19, ¿entidades iguales o diferentes?

BACKGROUND: Excessive release of cytokines in severe COVID-19 resembles secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH). AIM: To compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics between sHLH and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in COVID-19. METHODS: A review of articles in the PubMed database was performed, using the following keywords "HLH and COVID", "HScore in COVID". Articles available until July 16, 2020 were included. RESULTS: A comparative table was prepared based on the diagnostic criteria of the HLH 2004 protocol, HScore and characteristics of the CRS-COVID-19. Eighteen variables are used for comparison. DISCUSSION: The CRS in COVID-19 presented similarity with the CRS of sHLH; however, it cannot be stated that they are the same entity. Case reports of sHLH in COVID-19 are small. HScore is a tool that could guide the diagnosis of sHLH in the context of CRS-COVID-19, in a more practical way than the classic criteria described in HLH-2004; however, its application in COVID-19 is limited due to the absence of key features of the hyperinflammatory state of COVID-19 that are included in HLH. CONCLUSIONS: CRS-COVID-19 is not synonymous with sHLH. Although this last entity may or may not be present in the severe COVID-19.

[Hereditary angioedema in Costa Rica]. / Angioedema hereditario en Costa Rica.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema is classified as a primary immunodeficiency of the complement system because it is characterized by the absence of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) and by the periodic edema of any region of the body that involves soft tissue. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hereditary angioedema who have been treated in the Clinical Allergology Department of Hospital México de la Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social. METHODS: The study was retrospective and observational. The information was obtained from the clinical records of the patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hereditary angioedema that were being controlled in the Allergology Department of the "Hospital México de la Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social". RESULTS: A total of 14 patients; seven men and seven women, were identified. The average was of 36.6 years of age. The most frequent clinical manifestations were peripheral edema and abdominal pain. Only three patients presented laryngeal edema at some point in their evolution. 12 cases corresponded to hereditary angioedema type I. CONCLUSION: The clinical characteristics of all the documented cases corresponded to those described for this pathology, although only a few patients had a history of severe manifestations.

Antecedentes: El angioedema hereditario se encuentra clasificado como una inmunodeficiencia primaria del sistema de complemento, debido a que se caracteriza por la ausencia de C1 inhibidor esterasa y por edema periódico de cualquier región del cuerpo que involucre tejido blando. Objetivo: Caracterizar a los pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de angioedema hereditario atendidos en el Servicio de Alergología Clínica del Hospital México de la Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo. Los datos fueron obtenidos de los expedientes clínicos de los pacientes con diagnóstico confirmado de angioedema hereditario que estaban en seguimiento en el Servicio de Alergología del Hospital México, Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social. Resultados: Se identificaron 14 pacientes, siete hombres y siete mujeres. El promedio de edad fue de 36.6 años. Las manifestaciones clínicas más frecuentes fueron edema de extremidades y dolor abdominal. Solo tres pacientes en algún momento durante su evolución presentaron edema laríngeo; 12 casos correspondieron a angioedema hereditario tipo I. Conclusión: Las características clínicas de todos los casos documentados correspondieron con las descritas para angioedema, aunque solo algunos pacientes contaban con historial de manifestaciones graves.

Linfohistiocitosis hemofagocítica secundaria y síndrome de liberación de citoquinas en COVID-19, ¿entidades iguales o diferentes? / Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19, the same or different entities?

INTRODUCCIÓN: La liberación excesiva de citoquinas en COVID-19 grave se asemeja a la linfohistiocitosis hemofagocítica secundaria (sHLH). OBJETIVO: Comparar las características clínicas y de laboratorio entre sHLH y el síndrome de liberación de citoquinas (CRS) en COVID-19. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión de artículos en la base de datos PubMed, a través de las siguientes palabras clave "HLH and COVID", "HScore in COVID". Se incluyeron las publicaciones disponibles hasta el 16 julio 2020. RESULTADOS: Se elaboró un cuadro comparativo basado en los criterios diagnósticos del protocolo HLH 2004, HScore y características del CRS-COVID-19. Se utilizaron 18 variables para la comparación. DISCUSIÓN: El CRS en COVID-19 grave presenta similitud con el CRS del sHLH; sin embargo, no se puede afirmar que se traten de la misma entidad. Los reportes de sHLH en COVID-19 son escasos. HScore es una herramienta que podría orientar el diagnóstico de HLH secundario a COVID-19 de una manera más práctica que los criterios HLH-2004; sin embargo, su aplicación en COVID-19 se encuentra limitada debido a la ausencia de características claves del estado hiperinflamatorio de COVID-19 que sí destacan en HLH. CONCLUSIONES: El CRS-COVID-19 no es sinónimo de sHLH. Aunque esta última entidad podría o no estar presente en COVID-19 grave.

BACKGROUND: Excessive release of cytokines in severe COVID-19 resembles secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH). AIM: To compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics between sHLH and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in COVID-19. METHODS: A review of articles in the PubMed database was performed, using the following keywords "HLH and COVID", "HScore in COVID". Articles available until July 16, 2020 were included. RESULTS: A comparative table was prepared based on the diagnostic criteria of the HLH 2004 protocol, HScore and characteristics of the CRS-COVID-19. Eighteen variables are used for comparison. DISCUSSION: The CRS in COVID-19 presented similarity with the CRS of sHLH; however, it cannot be stated that they are the same entity. Case reports of sHLH in COVID-19 are small. HScore is a tool that could guide the diagnosis of sHLH in the context of CRS-COVID-19, in a more practical way than the classic criteria described in HLH-2004; however, its application in COVID-19 is limited due to the absence of key features of the hyperinflammatory state of COVID-19 that are included in HLH. CONCLUSIONS: CRS-COVID-19 is not synonymous with sHLH. Although this last entity may or may not be present in the severe COVID-19.

Sangrado espontáneo masivo en adulto conocido sano / (Massive spontaneous bleeding)

ResumenSe reporta el caso de un paciente que presentó de manera espontánea diátesis hemorrágica, sin tener causa alguna aparente que lo justificase. Tal diátesis hemorrágica forja un amplio apartado de posibilidades diagnósticas en cuanto a trastornos de la coagulación del adulto se refiere, en el contexto de un paciente conocido sano que nunca ha presentado episodios de sangrado mayor y debuta con hemorragias de forma masiva. Entre las muchas posibilidades diagnósticas se encuentra una poco conocida: la hemofilia adquirida. La hemofilia adquirida es un trastorno infrecuente de la hemostasia, caracterizado por la presencia de inhibidores adquiridos de los factores de la coagulación, en el plasma del paciente enfermo. Los inhibidores adquiridos son anticuerpos que a su vez podrían ser de tipo aloanticuerpos o autoanticuerpos. Los aloanticuerpos se desarrollan en pacientes deficitarios per se de factores de la coagulación, en respuesta a la terapia de sustitución de factores, lo que complica su tratamiento. Por su parte, los autoanticuerpos se desarrollan en sujetos sin defectos previos; son anticuerpos específicos contra un factor de la coagulación, afectando o no su función, alterando una o varias etapas de las vías de la coagulación. El caso que aquí se presenta es de un paciente masculino de 58 años, quien se presentó con sangrado espontáneo masivo y a quien se diagnosticó hemofilia adquirida por la presencia de autoanticuerpo específico del factor VIII.

AbstractA patient that presented with spontaneous hemorrhagic diathesis, with no apparent cause is presented. Hemorrhagic diathesis presents a wide range of diagnosis possibilities as of coagulation disorders are referred, in the context of a healthy patient with no previous major bleeding episodes and that debuts with massive hemorrhages. Acquired hemophilia, a little known disease, is one that must be considered.Acquired hemophilia is an uncommon hemostasis disorder characterized by the presence of acquired inhibitors of coagulation factors in the plasma of the sick patient. These acquired inhibitors, are antibodies that could be alloantibodies or autoantibodies. Alloantibodies are developed in patients who have coagulation factor deficiency, in response to factor replacement therapy, thus complicating treatment.On the other hand, autoantibodies are developed in people without previous defects and are specific against a factor of coagulation, affecting or not their function, obstructing one or several stages of the coagulation pathways. We report a case of acquired hemophilia due to an autoantibody against factor VIII in a 58 years old male patient with spontaneous massive bleeding.