Epidemiology and outcomes associated with enterococcal blood stream infection among liver and kidney transplant recipients.

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) account for 18% of bacterial infections in the first year after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Enterococcus accounts for up to 20% of BSIs in this population, with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) posing a particular risk. This is a retrospective, case-control study of adult liver and kidney transplant recipients between 01/01/2016 and 06/30/2021 that characterizes the epidemiology and outcomes of enterococcal BSIs in liver and kidney transplantations at a single institution. Subjects with an enterococcal BSI within the first 6 months post-transplant were compared to those with non-enterococcal BSIs in the same period. We identified 26 subjects with enterococcal BSIs and 28 controls with non-enterococcal BSIs (n = 54; 10.3%). Cases were mostly liver transplant recipients (n = 20; 77%) with a median MELD at transplant of 33 (range 14-43); controls included 14 KT recipients (50%). Groups differed significantly (all p < .05) by factors including perioperative transfusion requirements, need for reoperation, and number of interventions post-transplant. Cases had a median time of 25.5 days to infection and controls 100.5 days (p < .0001). There were no differences in 1-year mortality between the groups. Enterococcus faecium was the predominant species of Enterococcus (n = 23; 88.5%), with a majority (91.3%) of the isolates being VRE. In our liver and kidney transplants, enterococcal BSIs occurred early among liver transplant recipients. The high incidence of VRE among E. faecium isolates in this population warrants further investigation into the optimal approach to empiric antimicrobials for bacteremia in the early post-transplant period.

Influence of induction therapy and antiretroviral regimen on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients living with human immunodeficiency.

PURPOSE: Kidney transplantation has a survival benefit for people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and end-stage kidney disease, however increased rates of rejection remain an issue. Questions remain regarding the impact of induction immunosuppression therapy and antiretroviral (ARV) choice on long-term outcomes. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of outcomes in recipients with HIV who received kidneys from donors without HIV transplanted between 2004 and 2019. The association between induction and ARV regimens and long-term outcomes including rejection, graft, and recipient survival over 5 years was investigated using Cox regression modeling. RESULTS: Seventy-eight kidney transplants (KT) performed in 77 recipients at five US transplant centers were included, with median follow up of 7.1 (4.3-10.7) years. Overall recipient and graft survival were 83% and 67%, respectively. Rejection occurred in 37% (29/78). Recipients with rejection were more likely to be younger, recipients of deceased donor organs, and Black. Receipt of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction without protease-inhibitor (PI)-based ARVs was associated with 83% lower risk of rejection (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.17 (95% CI 0.05-0.63), p =.007) and a non-statistically significantly lower risk of graft failure (aHR 0.18 (0.03-1.16), p =.07) when compared to those who received other induction and ARV combinations. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter retrospective study, we found a trend toward lower rejection and improved graft survival among those who received both rATG for induction and PI-sparing ARVs.

Single-Center Outcomes of Epstein-Barr Virus DNAemia in Adult Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Background: Immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation (SOT) increases the risk of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia, which may herald development of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Few studies have characterized the incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact of EBV DNAemia in adult SOT recipients (SOTR). Methods: A single-center, retrospective review of adult (≥18 years) SOTR between 01 January 2015 and 31 December 2019 was conducted. Patients were stratified by the primary study endpoint of development of EBV DNAemia (whole blood EBV DNA PCR > 200 copies/mL). Secondary endpoints included development of PTLD, reduction in immunosuppression (RIS), use of pre-emptive therapy, and all-cause mortality. Results: Among 442 adult SOTR, the predominant transplant organs were the kidney (258, 58%) and liver (141, 31.9%). EBV serostatus in most subjects (430, 97%) was classified as intermediate risk (R+). Eight subjects (2%) were high risk (donor (D+/R-), and 4 (1%) were low risk (D-/R-). The overall incidence of EBV DNAemia was 4.1% (18/442) with a median time to detection of 14 months (range 3-60). The highest proportion of DNAemia was observed in D+/R- subjects (37.5%; p < 0.001). Development of PTLD was significantly associated with EBV DNAemia and occurred in 3/18 patients with DNAemia (16.7%) vs. 3/424 (0.7%) without DNAemia (p < 0.001). All patients with PTLD were managed with RIS and rituximab. Conclusion: We observed that EBV D+/R- serostatus and development of sustained EBV DNAemia were high risk features associated with subsequent development of PTLD in our cohort of adult SOTR.

Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm (REBYOTA®), Among Patients Exposed to Non-Clostridioides difficile Infection Antibiotics: Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of a Phase 2 Open-Label Study.

Background: Antibiotic use is a major risk factor for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) due to the associated disruption in gut microbiota. Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (REBYOTA®; RBL, previously RBX2660), is the first microbiota-based live biotherapeutic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to prevent recurrent CDI in adults following standard-of-care antibiotic treatment. To investigate the impact of non-CDI antibiotics on the durability of RBL, a subgroup analysis was conducted on PUNCH™ Open-Label study participants who received non-CDI antibiotics during the period between RBL administration and up to 2 years after. Methods: Participants in PUNCH™ Open-Label who received non-CDI antibiotics after RBL administration were included in this subgroup analysis. Treatment response was defined as the absence of CDI diarrhea needing retreatment at the last evaluable time point (8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years) after RBL administration. Results: Among participants from PUNCH™ Open-Label, 43 received non-CDI antibiotics after RBL administration but before CDI recurrence as evaluated over a 2-year period. Across all evaluable time points, 86% (37/43) of participants had a treatment response regardless of when non-CDI antibiotic exposure occurred. Treatment response was sustained for a median 470 days (IQR, 212-648) from the first day of non-CDI antibiotic use. Most participants (5/6) with CDI recurrences received a high-risk antibiotic. Conclusions: RBL remained efficacious in participants with a history of recurrent CDI after subsequent non-CDI antibiotic exposure. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02589847 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02589847).