Assessing surgeon stress when operating using heart rate variability and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory: will surgery be the death of us?

AIM: Performance in the operating room is affected by a combination of individual, patient and environmental factors amongst others. Stress has a potential negative impact on performance with the quality of surgical practice and patient safety being affected as a result. In order to appreciate the level of stress encountered during surgical procedures both objective and subjective methods can be used. This study reports the use of a combined objective (physiological) and subjective (psychological) method for evaluating stress experienced by the operating surgeon. METHOD: Six consultant colorectal surgeons were evaluated performing eighteen anterior resections. Heart rate was recorded using a wireless chest strap at eight pre-determined operative steps. Heart Rate Variability indices were calculated offline using computerized software. Surgeon reported stress was collected using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory, a validated clinical stress scale. RESULTS: A significant increase in stress was demonstrated in all surgeons whilst operating as indicated by sympathetic tone (control: 4.02 ± 2.28 vs operative: 11.42 ± 4.63; P < 0.0001). Peaks in stress according to operative step were comparable across procedures and surgeons. There was a significant positive correlation with subjective reporting of stress across procedures (r = 0.766; P = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a significant increase in sympathetic tone in consultant surgeons measured using heart rate variability during elective colorectal resections. A significant correlation can be demonstrated between HRV measurements and perceived stress using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory. A combined approach to assessing operative stress is required to evaluate any effect on performance and outcomes.

The FIFA 11+ injury prevention program reduces the incidence of lower extremity injuries in football players: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The FIFA 11+ preventive program is designed to reduce the incidence of injury in sports. However, to gain a better understanding of its effect a systematic review and meta-analysis is needed. The current review aims to investigate the effect of the FIFA 11+ preventive program on injury incidence among male and female football players. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This study used Scopus, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, and ProQuest as data sources. The initial selection of the studies, thorough assessment of the tile, and abstract. Extraction of the necessary study data was conducted by two independent researchers. Another two independent researchers assessed the quality of each included study against 39 used criteria. These criteria were combined from several popular quality assessment scales. The incidence of injuries measured in the lower extremities in football players after addressing the FIFA11+ was the outcome of interest. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: This review included 12 trials of variable methodological quality from which 10 trials were selected for the meta-analysis. In general, the FIFA11+ program showed a significant reduction (P<0.1) in lower limb injury incidence for male young and adults in comparison to other programs. However, evidence of its effectiveness in females is lacking and more studies are needed. CONCLUSIONS: The FIFA 11+ program is recommended to be used and implemented as a preventive strategy in males. Although, the result showed a significant reduction in injury incidence in adult males, heterogeneity between studies is high which may reduce the generalizability of the results. More studies are needed to investigate the effect of the FIFA 11+ program on females.