Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Cell ; 153(5): 1134-48, 2013 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23664764

ABSTRACT

Epigenetic mechanisms have been proposed to play crucial roles in mammalian development, but their precise functions are only partially understood. To investigate epigenetic regulation of embryonic development, we differentiated human embryonic stem cells into mesendoderm, neural progenitor cells, trophoblast-like cells, and mesenchymal stem cells and systematically characterized DNA methylation, chromatin modifications, and the transcriptome in each lineage. We found that promoters that are active in early developmental stages tend to be CG rich and mainly engage H3K27me3 upon silencing in nonexpressing lineages. By contrast, promoters for genes expressed preferentially at later stages are often CG poor and primarily employ DNA methylation upon repression. Interestingly, the early developmental regulatory genes are often located in large genomic domains that are generally devoid of DNA methylation in most lineages, which we termed DNA methylation valleys (DMVs). Our results suggest that distinct epigenetic mechanisms regulate early and late stages of ES cell differentiation.


Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Epigenomics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Chromatin/metabolism , CpG Islands , Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Histones/metabolism , Humans , Methylation , Neoplasms/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Zebrafish/embryology
2.
Nature ; 518(7539): 331-6, 2015 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25693564

ABSTRACT

Higher-order chromatin structure is emerging as an important regulator of gene expression. Although dynamic chromatin structures have been identified in the genome, the full scope of chromatin dynamics during mammalian development and lineage specification remains to be determined. By mapping genome-wide chromatin interactions in human embryonic stem (ES) cells and four human ES-cell-derived lineages, we uncover extensive chromatin reorganization during lineage specification. We observe that although self-associating chromatin domains are stable during differentiation, chromatin interactions both within and between domains change in a striking manner, altering 36% of active and inactive chromosomal compartments throughout the genome. By integrating chromatin interaction maps with haplotype-resolved epigenome and transcriptome data sets, we find widespread allelic bias in gene expression correlated with allele-biased chromatin states of linked promoters and distal enhancers. Our results therefore provide a global view of chromatin dynamics and a resource for studying long-range control of gene expression in distinct human cell lineages.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly , Chromatin/chemistry , Chromatin/metabolism , Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Epigenesis, Genetic/genetics , Alleles , Allelic Imbalance/genetics , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Lineage/genetics , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Epigenomics , Gene Regulatory Networks , Humans , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Nature ; 459(7243): 108-12, 2009 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19295514

ABSTRACT

The human body is composed of diverse cell types with distinct functions. Although it is known that lineage specification depends on cell-specific gene expression, which in turn is driven by promoters, enhancers, insulators and other cis-regulatory DNA sequences for each gene, the relative roles of these regulatory elements in this process are not clear. We have previously developed a chromatin-immunoprecipitation-based microarray method (ChIP-chip) to locate promoters, enhancers and insulators in the human genome. Here we use the same approach to identify these elements in multiple cell types and investigate their roles in cell-type-specific gene expression. We observed that the chromatin state at promoters and CTCF-binding at insulators is largely invariant across diverse cell types. In contrast, enhancers are marked with highly cell-type-specific histone modification patterns, strongly correlate to cell-type-specific gene expression programs on a global scale, and are functionally active in a cell-type-specific manner. Our results define over 55,000 potential transcriptional enhancers in the human genome, significantly expanding the current catalogue of human enhancers and highlighting the role of these elements in cell-type-specific gene expression.


Subject(s)
Cell Physiological Phenomena , Gene Expression Regulation , Histones/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Binding Sites , Cell Line , Chromatin/genetics , Genome, Human/genetics , HeLa Cells , Humans , K562 Cells , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
4.
Stem Cells ; 28(4): 687-94, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20166152

ABSTRACT

Derivation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells requires the expression of defined transcription factors (among Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc, Nanog, and Lin28) in the targeted cells. Lentiviral or standard retroviral gene transfer remains the most robust and commonly used approach. Low reprogramming frequency overall, and the higher efficiency of derivation utilizing integrating vectors compared to more recent nonviral approaches, suggests that gene activation or disruption via proviral integration sites (IS) may play a role in obtaining the pluripotent phenotype. We provide for the first time an extensive analysis of the lentiviral integration profile in human iPS cells. We identified a total of 78 independent IS in eight recently established iPS cell lines derived from either human fetal fibroblasts or newborn foreskin fibroblasts after lentiviral gene transfer of Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, and Lin28. The number of IS ranged from 5 to 15 IS per individual iPS clone, and 75 IS could be assigned to a unique chromosomal location. The different iPS clones had no IS in common. Expression analysis as well as extensive bioinformatic analysis did not reveal functional concordance of the lentiviral targeted genes between the different clones. Interestingly, in six of the eight iPS clones, some of the IS were found in pairs, integrated into the same chromosomal location within six base pairs of each other or in very close proximity. Our study supports recent reports that efficient reprogramming of human somatic cells is not dependent on insertional activation or deactivation of specific genes or gene classes.


Subject(s)
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/virology , Lentivirus/physiology , Virus Integration , Base Sequence , Cell Line , Cellular Reprogramming , Computational Biology , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Kruppel-Like Factor 4
5.
Cell Res ; 21(10): 1393-409, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21876557

ABSTRACT

Pluripotency, the ability of a cell to differentiate and give rise to all embryonic lineages, defines a small number of mammalian cell types such as embryonic stem (ES) cells. While it has been generally held that pluripotency is the product of a transcriptional regulatory network that activates and maintains the expression of key stem cell genes, accumulating evidence is pointing to a critical role for epigenetic processes in establishing and safeguarding the pluripotency of ES cells, as well as maintaining the identity of differentiated cell types. In order to better understand the role of epigenetic mechanisms in pluripotency, we have examined the dynamics of chromatin modifications genome-wide in human ES cells (hESCs) undergoing differentiation into a mesendodermal lineage. We found that chromatin modifications at promoters remain largely invariant during differentiation, except at a small number of promoters where a dynamic switch between acetylation and methylation at H3K27 marks the transition between activation and silencing of gene expression, suggesting a hierarchy in cell fate commitment over most differentially expressed genes. We also mapped over 50 000 potential enhancers, and observed much greater dynamics in chromatin modifications, especially H3K4me1 and H3K27ac, which correlate with expression of their potential target genes. Further analysis of these enhancers revealed potentially key transcriptional regulators of pluripotency and a chromatin signature indicative of a poised state that may confer developmental competence in hESCs. Our results provide new evidence supporting the role of chromatin modifications in defining enhancers and pluripotency.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation/physiology , Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Epigenesis, Genetic/physiology , Pluripotent Stem Cells/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic/physiology , Cell Line , Cell Lineage/physiology , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/physiology , Genome-Wide Association Study , Humans , Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL