Proximal femoral valgus osteotomy for the treatment of developmental coxa vara: a systematic review of the literature.

Background: Developmental Coxa Vara (DCV) consists on a pathological reduction in head-shaft angle (HSA) and increased femoral retroversion. Several case series reported outcomes on proximal femoral valgus osteotomy (PFVO), but no evidence synthesis had been conducted. This systematic review aimed to (1) analyze success rate and complications, (2) report the degree of correction according to the HSA and the Hilgenreiner Epiphyseal Angle (HEA), compare success rate and degree of correction of subtrochanteric (SVO) vs intertrochanteric (IVO) osteotomy, and (4) difference in success rate and correction between patients in which an internal (IF) or external fixation (EF) technique was used. Methods: Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were searched until February 20th, 2024 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies presenting outcomes on PFVO for DCV with >2 years follow-up and >5 patients were included. Review articles, language other than English and coxa vara secondary to other conditions were excluded. Study quality was evaluated through MINORS criteria. Results: 10 case series (level of evidence IV) were located for a total of 153 patients and 192 hips. Baseline results were as follows: male/female ratio was 1.45, mean age at surgery was 6.7 ± 1.5 and follow-up 5.1 ± 5.5 years. Overall success rate was 88.8%, with failure considered as any indication to revision surgery. Complications included loss of correction (10.9%), deep (1.0%) or superficial wound infection (2.6%). Revision surgery was performed in 18 hips (9.4%). Average correction was measured through HSA (preoperative 94.6 ± 8.1, postoperative 134.4 ± 10.2, change 38.2 ± 7.5°, p < 0.001) and HEA (preoperative 71.9 ± 5.5, postoperative 31.7 ± 5.7°, change 33.7 ± 10.5°, p < 0.001). Success rate was similar between osteotomy techniques (SVO: 91.0%; IVO: 94.1%; p = 0.48) and fixation strategy (IF: 85.4%; EF 95.8%; p = 0.096). Conclusions: PFVO presented satisfactory results for the treatment of DCV, with similar outcomes concerning the osteotomy site and fixation technique used. HSA and HEA correction were correlated to PFVO success rate. However, coxa vara is a tridimensional deformity, thus other parameters such as posterior sloping angle, mechanical axial deviation and proximal femoral offset should be included in future studies.

Surgical Technique: Arthroscopic Reduction and Fixation of Partial Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures.

Partial posterior wall fractures are usually fixed with open reduction-internal fixation through an open posterolateral approach, but when the fragment may be fixed without a plate (with screws only), reduction and fixation may also be achieved via hip arthroscopy with the patient in the prone position. This article presents all the surgical steps to perform this procedure.

Arthroscopic Reduction and Fixation of a Pipkin Type-I Femoral Head Fracture.

Background: This video article describes the technique for arthroscopic reduction and fixation of Pipkin type-I fractures. Description: Surgery is performed with the patient in a supine position, with free lower limbs, on a radiolucent table. Arthroscopic superior and anterolateral portals are made similarly to the portals created to evaluate the peripheral compartment during an outside-in (ballooning) technique.1 An additional medial portal is subsequently created in order to aid in reduction and screw placement. The medial portal is created in abduction and external rotation of the hip (i.e., the figure-4 position). The adductor tendon is identified, and the portal is then safely positioned posteriorly to its margin, approximately 4 to 5 cm distal to the inguinal fold, avoiding the saphenous vein (usually identified with an ultrasound scan). The fragment is mobilized, debrided, and then reduced with use of a microfracture awl or a large Kirschner wire (used as a joystick). Following reduction, temporary fixation is performed with use of long Kirschner wires under direct visualization and fluoroscopic guidance. If reduction is satisfactory, definitive fixation can be performed with use of 4.5-mm headless screws through the medial portal. All steps of fragment reduction and fixation are performed through the medial portal, with the patient in the figure-4 position. Once the screws are placed, a final dynamic arthroscopic and fluoroscopic check is performed. Alternatives: In Pipkin type-I fractures, surgery is recommended when the femoral head fragment is large (exceeding 15% to 20% of the femoral head volume) and displaced (by >3 mm). In such cases, if untreated, spontaneous evolution to osteoarthritis may occur. For fragments smaller than 10% to 15% of the femoral head volume, arthroscopic removal is often the best choice2. Several approaches (e.g., Smith-Petersen, modified Hueter, Kocher-Langenbeck, and surgical safe dislocation) have been proposed for reduction and fixation, with surgical safe dislocation being the most versatile because of the uniquely complete visualization of the femoral head3. Rationale: The arthroscopic reduction and fixation technique for a non-comminuted Pipkin type-I fracture holds the intrinsic advantages of being less invasive than open surgery in terms of surgical exposure, and having less blood loss, infection risks, and wound complications. Arthroscopy allows direct visualization of the fragment and its reduction surface, along with removal of articular loose bodies and debridement. The surgical time is influenced by the surgeon's experience, but often is no longer than with an open procedure. In the few studies assessing the use of this technique, the rates of osteonecrosis and heterotopic ossification are lower than with open techniques. It is worth noting that the studies assessing the use of this procedure are limited both in number and quality; however, the results of these studies have been excellent. It must also be noted that patients undergoing arthroscopic fixation are mostly selected for this treatment because they have less severe injuries2-12. Expected Outcomes: Open reduction and fixation through one of a variety of approaches is the gold standard treatment for Pipkin fractures; however, it is a relatively invasive procedure, prone to increased risks of osteonecrosis of the femoral head and heterotopic ossification (from 4% to 78% of cases). In some cases, arthroscopic reduction and fixation can be as effective as open reduction, and carries with it the intrinsic advantages of a keyhole procedure. The reported 4.6% global complication rate following arthroscopic fixation demonstrates the potential advantages of this technique, with limits due to the low numbers of treated cases4. Important Tips: The operating room should be carefully set up, especially regarding the positions of the C-arm and the arthroscopy tower, which should be double-checked before starting the procedure.The medial portal should be created after identification of the saphenous vein on an ultrasound scan. The anesthesiologist or a radiologist may mark the vein on the skin preoperatively, or the surgeon may extend the arthroscopic portal and perform a superficial dissection to avoid the vessel.Visualization after creation of the portals is usually suboptimal until the hematoma is completely removed. Patience must be maintained in this phase of the procedure.A microfracture awl or a large Kirschner wire can be utilized as a joystick to aid in reduction of the fragment, from either the usual portals or the medial portal. This aid can facilitate rotation of the fragment, which is a key step in the reduction phase.Definitive fixation can be achieved with use of 4.5-mm cannulated headless screws. Large cannulated headless screws have longer and larger Kirschner wires that can also aid in reduction when used as joysticks, reducing the risk of bending or breaking during screw insertion. Additionally, a 4.5-mm screwdriver is longer, allowing easier insertion, especially in patients with a larger thigh. The large diameter should not be a concern because the head is sunk in a non-weight-bearing area of the head.To avoid the risk of misplacement or loss of the screw during its insertion, make use of a cannulated guide handle for 4.5-mm screws, such as the guide utilized in a Latarjet arthroscopic procedure.To prevent screw loss into the joint, utilize a loop-knotted wire around the proximal part of the screw; this wire is cut at the end of the procedure. Acronyms and Abbreviations: AAFF = arthroscopic-assisted fracture fixationHO = heterotopic ossificationUS = ultrasound/ultrasonographyAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed tomographyASIS = anterosuperior iliac spineGT = greater trochanterSP = Smith-PetersenIF = internal fixationK-wire = Kirschner wire.

Endoscopic Assisted Percutaneous Fixation of Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Avulsion Fracture, Surgical Technique.

Avulsion fractures of the anterior inferior iliac spine rarely occur in adolescent athletes during rectus femoris contractions or eccentric muscle lengthening while the growth plate is still open. Currently, there are no official guidelines in the literature on the treatment indications of this type of fracture or the type of surgical technique to be used. Nowadays, young and athletic patients desire a quick return to their previous activities, which makes surgical treatment a reasonable choice. Open reduction and internal fixation with an anterior approach are usually recommended when the avulsion fragment has more than 1.5-2 cm displacement on plain radiographs. However, ORIF is associated with a higher risk of heterotopic ossifications and increases the risk of damage to the LFCN. An endoscopic technique was designed to reduce these complications. This technical note describes a procedure of percutaneous fixation to AIIS through 3 endoscopic portals that could potentially minimize complications associated with an open surgical dissection, allowing anatomic reduction under direct visualization.

Experimental assessment of pelvis slipping during postless traction for orthopaedic applications.

BACKGROUND: The application of lower limb traction during hip arthroscopy and femur fractures osteosynthesis is commonplace in orthopaedic surgeries. Traditional methods utilize a perineal post on a traction table, leading to soft tissue damage and nerve neuropraxia. A postless technique, using high-friction pads, has been considered as a potential damage-free alternative. However, whether these pads sufficiently prevent patient displacement remains unknown. Thus, this study systematically assesses the efficacy of commercial high-friction pads (PinkPad and CarePad) in restraining subject displacement, for progressively increasing traction loads and different Trendelenburg angles. METHODS: Three healthy male subjects were recruited and tested in supine and Trendelenburg positions (5° and 10°), using a customized boot-pulley system. Ten load disks (5 kg) were dropped at 15s intervals, increasing gradually the traction load up to 50 kg. Pelvis displacement along the traction direction was measured with a motion capture system. The displacement at 50 kg of traction load was analyzed and compared across various pads and bed inclinations. Response to varying traction loads was statistically assessed with a quadratic function model. RESULTS: Pelvis displacement at 50 kg traction load was below 60 mm for all conditions. Comparing PinkPad and CarePad, no significant differences in displacement were observed. Finally, similar displacements were observed for the supine and Trendelenburg positions. CONCLUSIONS: Both PinkPad and CarePad exhibited nearly linear behavior under increasing traction loads, limiting displacement to 60 mm at most for 50 kg loads. Contrary to expectations, placing subjects in the Trendelenburg position did not increase adhesion.

Ganz femoral head reduction associated with coverage and containment procedures improve radiological and functional outcomes in Perthes' disease.

Aims: Ganz's studies made it possible to address joint deformities on both the femoral and acetabular side brought about by Perthes' disease. Femoral head reduction osteotomy (FHRO) was developed to improve joint congruency, along with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), which may enhance coverage and containment. The purpose of this study is to show the clinical and morphological outcomes of the technique and the use of an implemented planning approach. Methods: From September 2015 to December 2021, 13 FHROs were performed on 11 patients for Perthes' disease in two centres. Of these, 11 hips had an associated PAO. A specific CT- and MRI-based protocol for virtual simulation of the corrections was developed. Outcomes were assessed with radiological parameters (sphericity index, extrusion index, integrity of the Shenton's line, lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle), and clinical parameters (range of motion, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and EuroQol five-dimension five-level health questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)). Early and late complications were reported. Results: The mean follow-up was 39.7 months (standard deviation (SD) 26.4). The mean age at surgery was 11.4 years (SD 1.6). No major complications were recorded. One patient required a total hip arthroplasty. Mean femoral head sphericity increased from 46.8% (SD 9.34%) to 70.2% (SD 15.44; p < 0.001); mean LCEA from 19.2° (SD 9.03°) to 44° (SD 10.27°; p < 0.001); mean extrusion index from 37.8 (SD 8.70) to 7.5 (SD 9.28; p < 0.001); and mean Tönnis angle from 16.5° (SD 12.35°) to 4.8° (SD 4.05°; p = 0.100). The mean VAS improved from 3.55 (SD 3.05) to 1.22 (1.72; p = 0.06); mean Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score from 14.55 (SD 1.74) to 16 (SD 1.6; p = 0.01); and mean mHHS from 60.6 (SD 18.06) to 81 (SD 6.63; p = 0.021). The EQ-5D-5L also showed significant improvements. Conclusion: FHRO associated with periacetabular procedures is a safe technique that showed improved functional, clinical, and morphological outcomes in Perthes' disease. The newly introduced simulation and planning algorithm may help to further refine the technique.

Groin Pain Syndrome Italian Consensus Conference update 2023.

Groin pain syndrome (GPS) is a controversial topic in Sports Medicine. The GPS Italian Consensus Conference on terminology, clinical evaluation and imaging assessment of groin pain in athletes was organized by the Italian Society of Arthroscopy in Milan, on 5 February 2016. In this Consensus Conference (CC) GPS etiology was divided into 11 different categories for a total of 63 pathologies. The GPS Italian Consensus Conference update 2023 is an update of the 2016 CC. The CC was based on a sequential, two-round online Delphi survey, followed by a final CC in the presence of all panelists. The panel was composed of 55 experts from different scientific and clinical backgrounds. Each expert discussed 6 different documents, one of which regarded the clinical and imaging definition of sports hernias, and the other 5 dealt with 5 new clinical situations thought to result in GPS. The panelists came to an agreement on the definition of a sports hernia. Furthermore, an agreement was reached, recognizing 4 of the 5 possible proposed pathologies as causes to GPS. On the contrary, the sixth pathology discussed did not find consensus given the insufficient evidence in the available scientific literature. The final document includes a new clinical and imaging definition of sports hernia. Furthermore, the etiology of GPS was updated compared to the previous CC of 2016. The new taxonomic classification includes 12 categories (versus 11 in the previous CC) and 67 pathologies (versus 63 in the previous CC).

The current treatment of hip arthroplasty revision: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular revision surgery is the most challenging aspect in hip prosthetic. There is lack of consensus on the optimal method of reconstructing the acetabular defects. The aim of this systematic review is to take stock of the state of the art on the options available and highlight which type of construct is the most reliable in usual clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The reporting of this systematic review was guided by the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2020 Statement.Electronic search of MEDLINE was performed from 1991 up to April 2021 to identify relevant studies for this review.  Discussion: various surgical techniques have been adopted and proposed to treat acetabular bone defects: cemented cups, large-sized non-cemented acetabular cups, higher positioned cups, reinforcement rings, cage, oblong cups, custom triflange implants, high porous metal cups and augments. Bone defect defines the type of components to be implanted and among those, outcomes are various depending on the study taken into account, the component used and the degree of initial bone defect. CONCLUSIONS: In acetabular revision surgerythe use of TM cups and augment is a valid option in presence of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuities. In clinical practice the use of TM components replaced rings, while the cup-cage implant replaced conventional cages. TM augments and cups can be considered as the most promising technique in the reconstruction of wide acetabular defects, while the use of cages can be considered as a valid option in the elderly population.