ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated ketamine to have a rapid antidepressant effect in some patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but the effect is unfortunately not sustained in the long term. In this study, we report on the clinical use of ongoing maintenance ketamine infusions in a group of patients with TRD, beyond an acute course of 6 to 8 ketamine infusions. METHODS: This retrospective case series reports on 11 patients with TRD who received maintenance ketamine infusions, defined as treatments beyond an initial series of up to 8 infusions. Charts were reviewed to collect data on response to treatment and side effects. RESULTS: All 11 patients in this case series were noted to have a reduction in their Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) score after an acute course of treatment and a lower median BDI-II during their maintenance treatments than their baseline BDI-II. At the study end point, 4 patients were continuing maintenance ketamine and 1 patient had transitioned to maintenance intranasal ketamine. Four patients discontinued ketamine due to loss of effect and 1 due to side effects, and the reason for discontinuation was not noted for the remaining 2 patients. No major adverse events were noted in these patients receiving maintenance treatments, and it was well tolerated overall. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance ketamine treatments may be an effective way of maintaining treatment response in some ketamine responders. Future research is required to determine optimal length of treatment in those who respond to ketamine and to track adverse effects over a longer time.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Ketamine/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Ketamine has gained rapid popularity as a treatment option for treatment resistant depression (TRD). Though seen only in limited contexts, ketamine is a potential drug of abuse, addiction and diversion. Clinical ketamine studies to date have not systematically evaluated factors relevant to addiction risk in patients with TRD, but in treating patients with ketamine, risks of potential harms related to addiction must be considered. As clinical access to intravenous ketamine programs is limited in much of Canada, these considerations become even more important for clinicians who elect to offer patients less supervised, non-parenteral forms of ketamine treatment. This study explores factors relevant to addiction risk in a real-world sample of 33 patients with TRD currently or previously treated with sublingual (SL) or intranasal (IN) ketamine in the community. First, patients were surveyed using a Drug Liking and Craving Questionnaire (DLCQ) to assess their level of drug liking and craving for ketamine, and to screen for symptoms of a ketamine use disorder. Second, the pharmacy records of these patients were reviewed for red flags for addiction such as dose escalation or early refills. Third, surveys were administered to the treating psychiatrists of patients who had discontinued ketamine to determine if abuse concerns contributed to reason for discontinuation. Though limited to a small sample, results indicate that ketamine is not a universally liked or craved substance in patients with TRD. Prescribers of non-parenteral ketamine should monitor patients and prescribe cautiously. Factors related to addiction (as in the DLCQ) should be explored for clinicians to consider individual risk/benefit for judicious use of ketamine in patients with TRD.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To achieve clinical validation of cutoff values for newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry through a worldwide collaborative effort. METHODS: Cumulative percentiles of amino acids and acylcarnitines in dried blood spots of approximately 2530 million normal newborns and 10,742 deidentified true positive cases are compared to assign clinical significance, which is achieved when the median of a disorder range is, and usually markedly outside, either the 99th or the 1st percentile of the normal population. The cutoff target ranges of analytes and ratios are then defined as the interval between selected percentiles of the two populations. When overlaps occur, adjustments are made to maximize sensitivity and specificity taking all available factors into consideration. RESULTS: As of December 1, 2010, 130 sites in 45 countries have uploaded a total of 25,114 percentile data points, 565,232 analyte results of true positive cases with 64 conditions, and 5,341 cutoff values. The average rate of submission of true positive cases between December 1, 2008, and December 1, 2010, was 5.1 cases/day. This cumulative evidence generated 91 high and 23 low cutoff target ranges. The overall proportion of cutoff values within the respective target range was 42% (2,269/5,341). CONCLUSION: An unprecedented level of cooperation and collaboration has allowed the objective definition of cutoff target ranges for 114 markers to be applied to newborn screening of rare metabolic disorders.
Subject(s)
Metabolic Diseases/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Amino Acids/blood , Carnitine/analogs & derivatives , Carnitine/blood , Humans , Infant, Newborn , International Cooperation , Reference Values , Sensitivity and Specificity , SoftwareABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Alberta maintains a universal screening program for congenital hypothyroidism, a condition which, when treated promptly prevents neurological impairment. Because the program relies on multiple stakeholders working in different areas, it is not known how effective the overall process is in achieving timely treatment initiation. Our objective was to analyze and describe the informatics of this program. METHODS: Data were collected from the Newborn Metabolic Screening Program and physician offices for hypothyroidism screen positive infants born between january 1, 2005 and May 31, 2008. Where data were available, times were determined for each interval: birth to sample collection, collection to receipt in central laboratory, receipt to report to the primary clinician, report to confirmatory test, and finally confirmation to thyroxin treatment. RESULTS: Complete information was found on the stages up until report generation. Although subsequent intervals had less complete data, all but 5 of the 57 newborns were followed to the endpoint of treatment initiation or diagnosis exclusion. The program was consistent and efficient in collecting, analyzing and reporting results to the primary physician by a median of 8 days (range 4-14 days). Subsequent steps resulted in a median time from birth to treatment of 11 days. There were 4 cases for which delays in clinician follow-up led to treatment initiation at 27, 34, 56 and 70 days. CONCLUSION: Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism in Alberta is efficient and consistent up until responsibility shifts to the community. Quality improvement work is needed to reduce potential delays.
Subject(s)
Congenital Hypothyroidism/prevention & control , Continuity of Patient Care , Information Dissemination , Neonatal Screening/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care , Alberta , Efficiency, Organizational , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Introduction: Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) is a common and burdensome condition with poor outcomes and few treatment options. Esketamine is the S-enantiomer of ketamine and has recently been FDA approved in the United States for treating depression that has failed to respond to trials of two or more antidepressants. Areas covered: This review will briefly discuss current treatment options for TRD, then review esketamine. Relevant literature was identified through online database searches, and clinical trial data were provided by Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Pharmacology, including kinetics and dynamics, is discussed, then clinical data regarding efficacy and safety for esketamine from Phase 2-3 trials are reviewed. Expert opinion: In the expert opinion, the authors discuss multiple factors including patient, physician, and social factors that will influence the use of esketamine. While the efficacy of esketamine compared to off-label use of racemic ketamine remains unclear, both esketamine's approval for use in TRD and longer-term safety data may position it preferentially above racemic ketamine, although factors such as cost and monitoring requirements may limit its use. While questions remain regarding duration and frequency of treatment, as well as addictive potential, esketamine is a novel treatment option offering new hope for TRD.