Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 51(3): e1-e7, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180840

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Syphilis is a curable sexually transmitted infection that, untreated, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In people living with HIV (PLWH), syphilis carries greater risks of disease progression. We estimated syphilis prevalence among PLWH in the general population in sub-Saharan Africa and compared the prevalence among PLWH and without HIV. METHODS: We searched for studies published January 1, 2011, to March 28, 2022, reporting syphilis prevalence among PLWH in sub-Saharan Africa (PROSPERO No. CRD42020167328). We excluded studies in high-risk subpopulations. We estimated pooled syphilis prevalence among PLWH using random-effects modeling and compared the prevalence with people without HIV when included in the same study. We examined influences of region, study setting, and test type in subgroup analyses. RESULTS: We identified 926 studies; 53 were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled syphilis prevalence among PLWH was 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3%-8.5%). Prevalence differed by region: 3.1% (95% CI, 2.2%-4.0%) in Southern, 5.5% (95% CI, 2.3%-9.3%) in West/Central, and 10.5% (95% CI, 8.0%-13.1%) in Eastern Africa. Prevalence also differed by study setting: 13.8% (95% CI, 5.7%-23.0%) in sexual and reproductive health/sexually transmitted infection care, 8.7% (95% CI, 5.0%-12.8%) in HIV care, 7.1% (95% CI, 5.8%-8.5%) in antenatal care, and 3.8% (95% CI, 2.0%-5.8%) in household/community-based settings. Syphilis prevalence was higher among PLWH than without HIV (relative risk, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.8-4.5). CONCLUSIONS: Syphilis is highly prevalent among PLWH in sub-Saharan Africa and is more common among PLWH than without HIV. Integration of syphilis screening and management into HIV care may reduce complications of HIV-syphilis coinfection among PLWH in sub-Saharan Africa.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Syphilis , Syphilis/epidemiology , Humans , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology , Prevalence , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/complications , Female , Male , Adult
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39036365

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In 2021, Jamaica's maternal mortality ratio doubled as a result of COVID-19-related deaths. Yet, COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant Jamaican women remained low. In the United States, COVID-19 vaccination is lower among pregnant women who have had multiple pregnancies (multigravidas) versus women who were pregnant for the first time (primigravidas). We examined whether this pattern exists in Jamaica. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of 79 pregnant Jamaican women recruited from a teaching hospital (May-July 2022) was used to assess self-reported COVID-19 vaccination and medical mistrust beliefs-operationalized as low vaccine confidence, government mistrust, and race-based mistrust-by gravidity. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for vaccination by gravidity, adjusting for age, education, and comorbidities. Results: Thirty-nine (49%) of the participants were multigravidas. Socioeconomic status was similar between multigravidas and primigravidas. COVID-19 vaccination was lower in multigravidas (46%) than primigravidas (75%) after adjusting for age, education, and comorbidities (aPR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.46-0.99; p = 0.044). Vaccine confidence was lower in multigravidas (p = 0.044). Government mistrust and race-based mistrust did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion: In Jamaica, multigravidas may have lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake and lower vaccine confidence compared with primigravidas. Understanding the distinct needs of pregnant subpopulations is essential for crafting effective maternal vaccination campaigns.

3.
J Perinatol ; 2024 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914748

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate feasibility and impact of "Tracheostomy Team" on survival and length of stay (LOS) at a level IV NICU. METHODS: Plan-do-study-act cycles targeted five Global Tracheostomy Collaborative "key drivers". From January 2017 to December 2022 multidisciplinary, bimonthly bedside rounds were conducted. RESULTS: After 3 cycles, in-hospital survival among 39 patients with tracheostomy improved and sustained from 67% to 100% (baseline 18/27; 66.7%; QI 35/39, 89.7%; p = 0.03). Median LOS (days [IQR]) did not significantly differ between baseline and QI (237 [57-308] vs. 217 [130-311]; p = 0.9). Among patients with BPD, median LOS was higher after QI interventions (baseline 248 [222-308] vs. QI 332.5 [283.5-392]; p = .02). Special cause variation resulted from peak increase in LOS during the COVID19 pandemic (2021). Tracheitis/pneumonia was treated significantly more frequently in QI BPD patients. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary approach is feasible, resulting in improved survival without a sustained increase in LOS. Future QI efforts should address post-operative infectious complications.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL