Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Clin J Sport Med ; 33(1): 45-51, 2023 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36205927

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: : Assess the relationships between wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and physiologic equivalent temperature (PET) at the start of a northern latitude marathon and their associations with medical stress and transfers to the emergency room (ER) when the race environment is unexpectedly warm, and participants are not acclimatized. DESIGN: : Retrospective review. SETTING: : Twin Cities Marathon from 1990 to 2019. PARTICIPANTS: : Runners competing in the Twin Cities Marathon. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: : Start WBGT (prospectively collected) and PET (retrospectively calculated). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: : Marathon race starters and finishers and race day medical data (eg, medical stress, number of medical encounters, and number of ER visits). RESULTS: : The mean WBGT was 7.4°C (range -1.7°C to 22.2°C), and the meant PET was 5.2°C (range -16.7°C to 25.9°C). PET was not determined to be a significant predictor of medical stress (P = 0.71); however, a significant quadratic association between WBGT and medical stress was found (P = 0.006). WBGT (P = 0.002), but not PET (P = 0.07), was a significant predictor of the number of ER visits. CONCLUSIONS: Start WBGT was a better predictor of medical stress and ER visits than PET at the Twin Cities Marathon over a 30-year period. The start WBGT may be a better tool to predict race day environment medical safety.


Subject(s)
Marathon Running , Running , Humans , Temperature , Cities , Retrospective Studies , Hot Temperature
2.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 21(3): 100-104, 2022 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35245245

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Coronavirus disease (COVID) has become a global pandemic that has widely impacted athletes at all levels of competition. For many athletes infected with COVID, the course is mild or asymptomatic, and most athletes are able to return to play in a matter of weeks. However, 10% to 15% of people infected with COVID will go on to have prolonged COVID symptoms that last for weeks to months and impact their ability to function and exercise. Not much is known about why certain people become "COVID long-haulers," nor are there any predictive tools to predetermine who may have prolonged symptoms. However, many athletes will suffer from prolonged symptoms that may require further evaluation and may prolong their return to exercise, training, and competition. The purpose of this article is to discuss a framework in which sports medicine and primary care physicians can use to evaluate COVID long-haulers and help them return to sport.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sports , Athletes , Humans , Pandemics , Return to Sport , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 20(10): 540-544, 2021 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34622819

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The 2019 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has dramatically changed the sports landscape, compelling sports medical providers to adapt to evolving scientific discoveries and adopt ever-changing guidelines that protect our athletes, ourselves, and our staff. To best serve our athletes, providers need to be proactive and anticipate potential complications in providing care for athletes as athletic events resume.


Subject(s)
Death, Sudden, Cardiac , Sports Medicine/methods , COVID-19 , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
4.
Clin J Sport Med ; 30(4): 315-320, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29952837

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the available infrastructure for secondary testing after preparticipation cardiovascular screening of collegiate athletes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletic programs PARTICIPANTS:: Team physicians. INTERVENTIONS: Online survey distributed by the NCAA and American Medical Society for Sports Medicine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Availability of secondary cardiovascular diagnostic testing and services. RESULTS: Team physicians from 235 schools completed the assessment, representing 21% of all NCAA schools. Ninety (38.3%) NCAA team physicians reported screening athletes using electrocardiogram (ECG). Division I schools were more likely than Division II and III schools to perform both screening ECG (RR, 2.38, P < 0.0001) and echocardiogram (RR, 2.83, P = 0.01). More than 97% of schools had access to resting echocardiogram, stress ECG/echocardiogram, and Holter monitoring within 25 miles with no significant variability between divisions, regions, or size of undergraduate student body. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiology studies were available within 25 miles of more than 80% of schools, and genetics testing was available within 25 miles for 64.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary testing for cardiovascular abnormalities seems to be readily available for NCAA athletes, regardless of division, region, or school size.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Mass Screening , Sports Medicine/organization & administration , Sports , Universities/organization & administration , Cross-Sectional Studies , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Echocardiography , Electrocardiography , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Health Surveys , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mass Screening/methods , Medical History Taking , Physical Examination , United States
5.
Eur Heart J ; 39(16): 1466-1480, 2018 04 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28329355

ABSTRACT

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of mortality in athletes during sport. A variety of mostly hereditary, structural, or electrical cardiac disorders are associated with SCD in young athletes, the majority of which can be identified or suggested by abnormalities on a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Whether used for diagnostic or screening purposes, physicians responsible for the cardiovascular care of athletes should be knowledgeable and competent in ECG interpretation in athletes. However, in most countries a shortage of physician expertise limits wider application of the ECG in the care of the athlete. A critical need exists for physician education in modern ECG interpretation that distinguishes normal physiological adaptations in athletes from distinctly abnormal findings suggestive of underlying pathology. Since the original 2010 European Society of Cardiology recommendations for ECG interpretation in athletes, ECG standards have evolved quickly over the last decade; pushed by a growing body of scientific data that both tests proposed criteria sets and establishes new evidence to guide refinements. On 26-27 February 2015, an international group of experts in sports cardiology, inherited cardiac disease, and sports medicine convened in Seattle, Washington, to update contemporary standards for ECG interpretation in athletes. The objective of the meeting was to define and revise ECG interpretation standards based on new and emerging research and to develop a clear guide to the proper evaluation of ECG abnormalities in athletes. This statement represents an international consensus for ECG interpretation in athletes and provides expert opinion-based recommendations linking specific ECG abnormalities and the secondary evaluation for conditions associated with SCD.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Electrocardiography , Heart/physiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Electrocardiography/standards , Heart/physiopathology , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Humans
6.
Br J Sports Med ; 51(3): 153-167, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27660369

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular screening in young athletes is widely recommended and routinely performed prior to participation in competitive sports. While there is general agreement that early detection of cardiac conditions at risk for sudden cardiac arrest and death (SCA/D) is an important objective, the optimal strategy for cardiovascular screening in athletes remains an issue of considerable debate. At the centre of the controversy is the addition of a resting ECG to the standard preparticipation evaluation using history and physical examination. The American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) formed a task force to address the current evidence and knowledge gaps regarding preparticipation cardiovascular screening in athletes from the perspective of a primary care sports medicine physician. The absence of definitive outcome-based evidence at this time precludes AMSSM from endorsing any single or universal cardiovascular screening strategy for all athletes, including legislative mandates. This statement presents a new paradigm to assist the individual physician in assessing the most appropriate cardiovascular screening strategy unique to their athlete population, community needs and resources. The decision to implement a cardiovascular screening programme, with or without the addition of ECG, necessitates careful consideration of the risk of SCA/D in the targeted population and the availability of cardiology resources and infrastructure. Importantly, it is the individual physician's assessment in the context of an emerging evidence base that the chosen model for early detection of cardiac disorders in the specific population provides greater benefit than harm. AMSSM is committed to advancing evidenced-based research and educational initiatives that will validate and promote the most efficacious strategies to foster safe sport participation and reduce SCA/D in athletes.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Cardiovascular System , Mass Screening/standards , Physical Examination , Sports Medicine/standards , Advisory Committees , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Societies, Medical , Sports , United States
7.
Br J Sports Med ; 51(9): 704-731, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28258178

ABSTRACT

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of mortality in athletes during sport. A variety of mostly hereditary, structural or electrical cardiac disorders are associated with SCD in young athletes, the majority of which can be identified or suggested by abnormalities on a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Whether used for diagnostic or screening purposes, physicians responsible for the cardiovascular care of athletes should be knowledgeable and competent in ECG interpretation in athletes. However, in most countries a shortage of physician expertise limits wider application of the ECG in the care of the athlete. A critical need exists for physician education in modern ECG interpretation that distinguishes normal physiological adaptations in athletes from distinctly abnormal findings suggestive of underlying pathology. Since the original 2010 European Society of Cardiology recommendations for ECG interpretation in athletes, ECG standards have evolved quickly, advanced by a growing body of scientific data and investigations that both examine proposed criteria sets and establish new evidence to guide refinements. On 26-27 February 2015, an international group of experts in sports cardiology, inherited cardiac disease, and sports medicine convened in Seattle, Washington (USA), to update contemporary standards for ECG interpretation in athletes. The objective of the meeting was to define and revise ECG interpretation standards based on new and emerging research and to develop a clear guide to the proper evaluation of ECG abnormalities in athletes. This statement represents an international consensus for ECG interpretation in athletes and provides expert opinion-based recommendations linking specific ECG abnormalities and the secondary evaluation for conditions associated with SCD.


Subject(s)
Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Electrocardiography/standards , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Sports Medicine/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Athletes , Child , Consensus , Humans , Mass Screening , Washington , Young Adult
8.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 16(4): 280-288, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28696992

ABSTRACT

Interest and participation in triathlon has grown rapidly over the past 20 yr and with this growth, there has been an increase in the number of new events. To maximize the safety of participation, triathlons require medical directors to plan and oversee medical care associated with event participation. Provision of proper medical care requires knowledge of staffing requirements, common triathlon medical conditions, impact of course design, communication skill, and a familiarity of administrative requirements. These guidelines serve as a tool for triathlon medical and race directors to improve race safety for athletes.


Subject(s)
Bicycling , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Physician Executives , Running , Sports Medicine/organization & administration , Swimming , Anniversaries and Special Events , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
9.
Br J Sports Med ; 50(22): 1360-1366, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26941276

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent reports from triathlon and competitive open-water swimming indicate that these events have higher rates of death compared with other forms of endurance sport. The potential causal mechanism for swimming-related death is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine available studies on the hypothesised mechanisms of swimming-related death to determine the most likely aetiologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1950 to present) were searched, yielding 1950 potential results, which after title and citation reviews were reduced to 83 possible reports. Studies included discussed mechanisms of death during swimming in humans, and were Level 4 evidence or higher. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies (366 total swimmers) were included for further analysis: 5 investigating hyperthermia/hypothermia, 7 examining cardiac mechanisms and responses, and 5 determining the presence of pulmonary edema. The studies provide inconsistent and limited-quality or disease-oriented evidence that make definitive conclusions difficult. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence is limited but may suggest that cardiac arrhythmias are the most likely aetiology of swimming-related death. While symptoms of pulmonary edema may occur during swimming, current evidence does not support swimming-induced pulmonary edema as a frequent cause of swimming-related death, nor is there evidence to link hypothermia or hyperthermia as a causal mechanism. Further higher level studies are needed.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Cause of Death , Pulmonary Edema/epidemiology , Swimming , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Humans , Pulmonary Edema/etiology
10.
Clin J Sport Med ; 26(5): 347-61, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27598018

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular (CV) screening in young athletes is widely recommended and routinely performed before participation in competitive sports. While there is general agreement that early detection of cardiac conditions at risk for sudden cardiac arrest and death (SCA/D) is an important objective, the optimal strategy for CV screening in athletes remains an issue of considerable debate. At the center of the controversy is the addition of a resting electrocardiogram (ECG) to the standard preparticipation evaluation using history and physical examination. The American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) formed a task force to address the current evidence and knowledge gaps regarding preparticipation CV screening in athletes from the perspective of a primary care sports medicine physician. The absence of definitive outcomes-based evidence at this time precludes AMSSM from endorsing any single or universal CV screening strategy for all athletes including legislative mandates. This statement presents a new paradigm to assist the individual physician in assessing the most appropriate CV screening strategy unique to their athlete population, community needs, and resources. The decision to implement a CV screening program, with or without the addition of ECG, necessitates careful consideration of the risk of SCA/D in the targeted population and the availability of cardiology resources and infrastructure. Importantly, it is the individual physician's assessment in the context of an emerging evidence base that the chosen model for early detection of cardiac disorders in the specific population provides greater benefit than harm. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine is committed to advancing evidenced-based research and educational initiatives that will validate and promote the most efficacious strategies to foster safe sport participation and reduce SCA/D in athletes.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Electrocardiography/standards , Mass Screening/standards , Physical Examination/standards , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Societies, Medical , Sports Medicine , United States
11.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 15(2): 81-5, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26963014

ABSTRACT

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young athletes is publicly remarkable and tragic because of the loss of a seemingly healthy young person. Because many of the potential etiologies may be identified with a preparticipation electrocardiogram (ECG), the possible use of an ECG as a screening tool has received much attention. A good screening test should be cost-effective and should influence a disease or health outcome that has a significant impact on public health. The reality is that the prevalence of SCD is low and no outcome-based data exist to determine whether early detection saves lives. Further, there is insufficient screening infrastructure, and the risk of screening and follow-up may be higher than that of the actual disease. Until outcomes data demonstrate a benefit with regard to SCD, universal screening cannot be recommended.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Electrocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Electrocardiography/economics , Electrocardiography/standards , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/standards , Physical Examination/economics , Physical Examination/standards , Physical Examination/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors
12.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 15(5): 359-75, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27618246

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular screening in young athletes is widely recommended and routinely performed prior to participation in competitive sports. While there is general agreement that early detection of cardiac conditions at risk for sudden cardiac arrest and death (SCA/D) is an important objective, the optimal strategy for cardiovascular screening in athletes remains an issue of considerable debate. At the center of the controversy is the addition of a resting electrocardiogram (ECG) to the standard preparticipation evaluation using history and physical examination. The American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) formed a task force to address the current evidence and knowledge gaps regarding preparticipation cardiovascular screening in athletes from the perspective of a primary care sports medicine physician. The absence of definitive outcomes-based evidence at this time precludes AMSSM from endorsing any single or universal cardiovascular screening strategy for all athletes, including legislative mandates. This statement presents a new paradigm to assist the individual physician in assessing the most appropriate cardiovascular screening strategy unique to their athlete population, community needs, and resources. The decision to implement a cardiovascular screening program, with or without the addition of ECG, necessitates careful consideration of the risk of SCA/D in the targeted population and the availability of cardiology resources and infrastructure. Importantly, it is the individual physician's assessment in the context of an emerging evidence-base that the chosen model for early detection of cardiac disorders in the specific population provides greater benefit than harm. AMSSM is committed to advancing evidenced-based research and educational initiatives that will validate and promote the most efficacious strategies to foster safe sport participation and reduce SCA/D in athletes.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Eligibility Determination/standards , Exercise Test/standards , Mass Screening/standards , Sports Medicine/standards , Sports/standards , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States
13.
J Electrocardiol ; 48(3): 311-5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25669141

ABSTRACT

The addition of an electrocardiogram (ECG) to the current United States athlete preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) as a screening tool has dominated the PPE discussion over the past decade despite the lack of demonstrable outcomes data supporting the routine use of the diagnostic study for reduction of sudden cardiac death (SCD). A good screening test should influence a disease or health outcome that has a significant impact on public health and the population screened must have a high prevalence of the disease to justify the screening intervention. While SCD is publicly remarkable and like any death, tragic, the prevalence of SCD in young athletes is very low and the potential for false positive results is high. While ECG screening appears to have made an impact on SCD in Italian athletes, the strategy has made no impact on Israeli athletes, and the overall impact of ECG screening on American athletes is unclear. Until outcomes studies show substantial SCD reduction benefit, the addition of routine ECG PPE screening in young athletes should not be instituted.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/epidemiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Electrocardiography/standards , Mandatory Testing/statistics & numerical data , Sports Medicine/methods , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Electrocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Physical Examination/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology
14.
Clin J Sport Med ; 25(5): 437-42, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26340737

ABSTRACT

Exertional heat illness can be a serious consequence of sports or exercise in hot environments. Participants can possess intrinsic or face extrinsic risk factors that may increase their risk for heat-related illness. Knowledge of the physiology and pathology of heat illness, identification of risk factors, and strategies to combat heat accumulation will aid both the practitioner and the participant in preparing for activities that occur in hot environments. Through preparation and mitigation of risk, safe and enjoyable wilderness adventure can be pursued.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure , Physical Examination/methods , Wilderness Medicine , Heat Stroke/prevention & control , Hot Temperature , Humans , Risk Assessment , Sports , Wilderness
15.
Clin J Sport Med ; 25(5): 396-403, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26340731

ABSTRACT

Participation in wilderness and adventure sports is on the rise, and as such, practitioners will see more athletes seeking clearance to participate in these events. The purpose of this article is to describe specific medical conditions that may worsen or present challenges to the athlete in a wilderness environment.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease , Physical Examination , Safety , Sports , Wilderness Medicine , Wilderness , Humans , Risk Assessment/methods
16.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 26(4 Suppl): S69-75, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26617381

ABSTRACT

Exertional heat illness can be a serious consequence of sports or exercise in hot environments. Participants can possess intrinsic or face extrinsic risk factors that may increase their risk for heat-related illness. Knowledge of the physiology and pathology of heat illness, identification of risk factors, and strategies to combat heat accumulation will aid both the practitioner and the participant in preparing for activities that occur in hot environments. Through preparation and mitigation of risk, safe and enjoyable wilderness adventure can be pursued.


Subject(s)
Heat Stress Disorders/prevention & control , Hot Temperature/adverse effects , Physical Examination/methods , Exercise/physiology , Heat Stress Disorders/epidemiology , Heat Stress Disorders/etiology , Humans , Medical History Taking/methods , Physical Exertion/physiology , Risk Factors , Sports/physiology , Wilderness
17.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 26(4 Suppl): S20-9, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26617375

ABSTRACT

Participation in wilderness and adventure sports is on the rise, and as such, practitioners will see more athletes seeking clearance to participate in these events. The purpose of this article is to describe specific medical conditions that may worsen or present challenges to the athlete in a wilderness environment.


Subject(s)
Physical Examination/methods , Risk Assessment , Sports Medicine/methods , Sports , Wilderness , Athletes , Chronic Disease , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Mental Disorders , Physician-Patient Relations , Risk Factors
18.
Clin J Sport Med ; 24(4): 275-9, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24451693

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Determine the cardiovascular screening practices of college team physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Electronic mail with a link to a 9-item survey. PARTICIPANTS: American Medical Society for Sports Medicine college team physicians. INTERVENTIONS: Screening practices survey administered to college team physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiovascular preparticipation screening practices including noninvasive cardiac screening (NICS) such as electrocardiogram (ECG) or echocardiogram. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-four of 613 AMSSM members identifying themselves as college team physicians (36.5%) responded: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I: 146, Division II: 41, Division III: 27, National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics: 8, and Junior College: 2. The majority (78%) of schools conducted the American Heart Association (AHA) 12-element history and physical examination. Division I institutions were more likely to add an ECG and/or echocardiogram (30%) to their preparticipation examination (PPE) compared with lower divisions (P < 0.0001). Those Division I schools using NICS were more likely to do so for all athletes (P < 0.001) or revenue generating sports (P < 0.001), whereas other institutions did so only for high-risk subgroups (P < 0.01). Lower division schools would consider adding ECG if it cost less (P = 0.01) or if there were more local expertise in athlete-specific interpretation standards (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Many National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes Division I programs already use NICS to screen athletes, whereas a significant portion of lower division schools add ECG for athletes deemed high risk. Increased use of these modalities suggests limitations of traditional PPE screening methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This is the first study to assess cardiac screening practices across all collegiate divisions and broadens our understanding of cardiac screening in high-level athletes.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Sports Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Universities/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Humans
19.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 13(6): 361-4, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25391090

ABSTRACT

Regular moderate exercise confers many cardiovascular and health benefits. Because of this, endurance sports events have become very popular with participation increasing tremendously over the past few years. In conjunction with this increase in popularity and participation, people also have increased the amount that they exercise with many training for and competing in ultraendurance events such as ultradistance running events, iron distance triathlons, or multiday races. This excess endurance activity may appear to increase the risk of cardiac abnormalities, which may increase the risk for long-term morbidity or mortality. While it is known that moderate exercise has benefits to cardiovascular health, ultimately, the long-term cardiac effects of excessive endurance activity are unclear. What is clear, however, is that moderate exercise is beneficial, and to date, the evidence does not support recommending against physical activity.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological , Exercise/physiology , Myocardium/pathology , Physical Conditioning, Human/adverse effects , Physical Endurance/physiology , Ventricular Function/physiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Biomarkers/blood , Cardiomegaly, Exercise-Induced/physiology , Fibrosis , Heart Ventricles/anatomy & histology , Humans
20.
Br J Sports Med ; 47(3): 125-36, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23303759

ABSTRACT

Electrocardiographic changes in athletes are common and usually reflect benign structural and electrical remodelling of the heart as a physiological adaptation to regular and sustained physical training (athlete's heart). The ability to identify an abnormality on the 12-lead ECG, suggestive of underlying cardiac disease associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD), is based on a sound working knowledge of the normal ECG characteristics within the athletic population. This document will assist physicians in identifying normal ECG patterns commonly found in athletes. The ECG findings presented as normal in athletes were established by an international consensus panel of experts in sports cardiology and sports medicine.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Electrocardiography , Sports/physiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Black People , Cardiomegaly, Exercise-Induced/physiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/diagnosis , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/physiopathology , Male , Reference Values
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL