Poor outcomes of fusion with Trabecular Metal implants after failed total ankle replacement: Early results in 11 patients.

INTRODUCTION: One of the reasons for revision of total ankle replacement (TAR) implants is loosening due to subchondral cysts. Reconstruction and fusion of the ankle is often the first choice for revision procedures due to the large bone defects, which are typically filled with autograft and/or allograft. Filling the defect with a trabecular metal tantalum implant is a potential alternative given the biomechanical properties of this component. HYPOTHESIS: Using tantalum as a spacer provides primary stability and contributes to fusion of the ankle joint after removal of failed TAR implants. METHODS: Eleven patients underwent arthrodesis an average of 6.9 years after TAR. The mean height of the bone defect was 32mm. It was filled with a specially designed quadrangular implant (Trabecular Metal™, Zimmer/Biomet) combined with an iliac crest graft. Ten patients underwent tibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis fixed with an angled retrograde nail and one patient underwent talocrural arthrodesis fixed with two plates (anterolateral and anteromedial). The clinical, functional (AOFAS and SF36 scores) and radiological (plain X-rays and CT scan) outcomes were determined. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 19.3 months, the mean total AOFAS score was 56 (21-78) and the mean SF36 score was 60.5 (19-84). One patient was lost to follow-up and four patients still had pain. The tantalum implant was integrated in six patients. Five patients achieved fusion of the subtalar joint and 8 achieved fusion of the talocrural joint. Three patients required surgical revision. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis was not confirmed. The clinical outcomes after more than 1 year of follow-up are disappointing, as was the large number of nonunion cases and the lack of tantalum integration. These technical failures can be explained by insufficient construct stability and/or insufficient implant porosity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (retrospective cohort study).

Does using a polyethylene RM press-fit cup modify the preparation of the acetabulum and acetabular offset in primary hip arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: When performing total hip arthroplasty (THA), it is important to maintain the femoral and acetabular offsets to ensure good joint stability and to restore the function of the hip abductor muscles. In our practice, we mainly use a lateralized stem and hollow out the acetabulum to the quadrilateral plate to accommodate a press-fit polyethylene cup. However, the repercussions of this preparation method, which is driven by the cup's design, are not known. We carried out a retrospective study to assess: (1) the changes in the femoral and acetabular offset; (2) the height of the center of rotation; and (3) the repercussions on wear. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized there would be no significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative femoral and acetabular offsets. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 88 primary THA cases performed with the RM Pressfit™ cup that had a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. A lateralized self-locking Muller-type cemented femoral stem was used in 92.0% of cases and a standard stem in 8.0%. Measurements were done on plain radiographs with MHP™ and Mesurim Pro™ software. The average follow-up was 6.5 years (5-8). RESULTS: On average, the acetabular offset was reduced by 2.75mm±5.9 mm (range: -17.5 to +10.6 mm) (P<0.001) and the femoral offset was increased by 0.01mm±5.5 mm (range: -17.8 to +11.0 mm) (P=0.99). In terms of total offset, medialization of 2.74mm±7 mm (range: -17.7 to +18.2mm) was found (P=0.001). The acetabular center of rotation was on average 4.77mm±5.1 mm higher (P<0.001). The mean annual wear at the more recent follow-up (min.: 5 years) was 0.068mm (range: 0.01 to 0.25mm) per year. The wear was not impacted by having more than 5mm change in offset. DISCUSSION: Measurements of acetabular offset revealed statistically significant medialization due to the type of implant used and the surgical technique. The anatomical technique consists of positioning the cup in subchondral bone without contacting the quadrilateral plate. This preserves bone stock, which may be useful later on if the cup is revised, particularly in younger patients. Conversely, the femoral offset did not change significantly, despite the use of lateralized stems in 92.0% of cases. We measured an annual wear rate of 0.068mm per year, which is lower than in other published studies, possibly because our patient population was older. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.