ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate recovery patterns of olfactory dysfunction among recovered COVID-19 patients, both subjective and objective, and correlate this recovery to the severity of the disease. METHODS: The study recruited 200 patients and assigned them to two equal groups, one of them was a control group. The olfactory function of the study group was assessed via subjective and objective methods at baseline and then monthly for three months, with changes in smell function reported at each visit. These patients underwent chemosensory testing using the Sniffin' Sticks test and completed the validated Arabic version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS). RESULTS: Olfactory dysfunction occurred on the first day of COVID-19 symptoms in 37% of participants. Subjective reports suggested smell recovery in 55% after 3 months, but Sniffin' Sticks showed only 1% with normal function, indicating persistent deficits in others. This study revealed smell recovery for 93% of participants (median 14 days), with most (58%) recovering within 2 weeks. No significant links were found between demographics, COVID-smell loss timing, and recovery speed. CONCLUSION: Three months after COVID-19, many patients perceive smell recovery, but objective tests reveal shockingly high rates of persistent dysfunction. Further follow-up with objective tests is vital to assess the true burden and potential long-term effects of smell loss.
ABSTRACT
To record the incidence of hypothyroidism in patients after total laryngectomy, whether with or without postoperative radiation therapy and to analyze the effect of hemithyroidectomy for the development of hypothyroidism. A retrospective study included patients who underwent total laryngectomy (with or without hemithyroidectomy) between 2018 and 2021 for laryngeal carcinoma and/or received postoperative radiotherapy. Thirty-six (45%) of the 80 enrolled patients developed hypothyroidism after a median follow-up of 16 months. In this study, adjuvant radiation and central neck dissection were found to be significantly linked with developing post-operative hypothyroidism (p values: 0.001, 0.007, respectively). The incidence of hypothyroidism in patients treated for laryngeal carcinoma is high, especially after combination treatment of surgery and radiotherapy.
ABSTRACT
Rhino sinusitis, is a common inflammatory disease that affects the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses in millions of individuals. Chronic sinusitis patients complain of a combination of nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, post nasal drip and facial pain. To identify the risk factors of the recurrence of nasal polyps in chronic rhino sinusitis patients after endoscopic sinus surgery. After a review of 60 patients with chronic rhino sinusitis with failed medical treatment requiring FESS presenting in Kasr Alainy Hospital in Cairo University and October 6 University Hospital from May 2022 to March 2023. All patients were subjected to history taking, clinical examination including endoscopy, subjective evaluation of symptoms and CT-scan. Of our patients, six patients (15%) were diagnosed with recurrence of nasal polyps with chronic rhino sinusitis and needed revision surgery. There are multiple risk factors related to the recurrence of nasal polyps including smoking followed by having a history of an asthma, the presence of an allergy, septal deviation, prior sinus surgery, and turbinate hypertrophy. Other factors, as proper medical treatment such as topical steroids and treatment of allergy had a significant role in decreasing the recurrence rate. Risk factors related to the recurrence of nasal polyps should be avoided before surgery. The avoidance of risk factors protects the patients from the recurrence of nasal polyps, the hazards of anaesthesia on surgical treatment, and the financial cost of surgery. Follow up is important in the prevention of recurrence of nasal polyps and improves the symptoms.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The goal of rhinoplasty is not exclusively aesthetic and the nasal function should always be considered. Several rhinoplasty techniques can participate in nasal valve dysfunction (eg, dorsal hump reductions). Therefore, mid-nasal vault reconstruction by spreader grafts or flaps is mandatory in these cases. To date, there is a literature gap in comparing both techniques objectively. This study shows an objective comparison between spreader grafts and flaps for mid-nasal vault reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was a double-blind randomized controlled trial including 40 patients who were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (20 patients) underwent spreader grafts insertion, whereas group 2 (20 patients) underwent spreader flap placement technique. Pre-operative active anterior rhinomanometry measurements were compared to 6-month post-operative measurements. Data were summarized as mean (standard deviation) for the quantitative variables. Comparisons between the 2 groups were done using unpaired t test. RESULTS: In both groups, a significant decrease in nasal resistance was noted in both the right and left sides 6 months post-operatively (P < .001). However, the comparison between the 2 both groups showed no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Both spreader grafts and flaps, which are used for the mid-nasal vault reconstruction, have comparable and effective results in reducing the nasal resistance as evidenced by active anterior rhinomanometry measurements.
HISTORIQUE: La rhinoplastie n'a pas seulement un objectif esthétique. En effet, il faut toujours tenir compte de la fonction nasale. Plusieurs techniques de rhinoplastie peuvent entraîner une dysfonction de la valve nasale, par exemple en cas de réduction de la bosse dorsale. Dans ces situations, il faut absolument procéder à une reconstruction de la voûte nasale par greffes ou lambeaux d'extension. Jusqu'à présent, les publications scientifiques n'ont pas comparé pas objectivement les deux techniques. La présente étude contient une comparaison objective entre des greffes et des lambeaux d'extension lors de la reconstruction de la voûte nasale. OBJECTIF: La présente étude présente une comparaison objective entre les greffes et les lambeaux d'extension lors de la reconstruction de la voûte nasale. MÉTHODOLOGIE: La présente étude aléatoire et contrôlée à double insu comptait 40 patients répartis au hasard entre deux groupes. Le groupe 1 (20 patients) a subi l'insertion de greffes d'extension et le groupe 2 (20 patients), la technique d'installation de lambeaux d'extension. Les chercheurs ont comparé les mesures de rhinamométrie antérieure active obtenues avant l'opération à celles obtenues six mois après l'opération. Ils ont résumé les données relatives aux variables quantitatives à l'aide de l'écart-type moyen et standard. Ils ont comparé les deux groupes à l'aide du test de Student non apparié. RÉSULTATS: Dans les deux groupes, la résistance nasale latérale droite et gauche avait diminué considérablement six mois après l'opération (P < 0,001). Cependant, d'après la comparaison entre les deux groupes, cette différence n'était pas statistiquement significative. CONCLUSION: Les greffes et les lambeaux d'extension utilisés pour la reconstruction de la voûte nasale, donnent des résultats comparables et efficaces pour réduire la résistance nasale, tel que le démontrent les mesures de rhinamométrie antérieure active.