Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Rheumatol ; 51(5): 529-537, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428964

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Many individuals with rheumatic disease are at higher risk for severe acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to evaluate risk factors for postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) using an electronic health record (EHR)-based definition. METHODS: We identified patients with prevalent rheumatic diseases and COVID-19 within the Mass General Brigham healthcare system. PASC was defined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes, relevant labs, vital signs, and medications at least 30 days following the first COVID-19 infection. Patients were followed until the earliest of incident PASC, repeat COVID-19 infection, 1 year of follow-up, death, or February 19, 2023. We used multivariable Cox regression to estimate the association of baseline characteristics with PASC risk. RESULTS: Among 2459 patients (76.37% female, mean age 57.4 years), the most common incident PASC manifestations were cough (14.56%), dyspnea (12.36%), constipation (11.39%), and fatigue (10.70%). Serious manifestations including acute coronary disease (4.43%), thromboembolism (3.09%), hypoxemia (3.09%), stroke (1.75%), and myocarditis (0.12%) were rare. The Delta wave (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.49-0.82) and Omicron era (aHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.62) were associated with lower risk of PASC than the early pandemic period (March 2020-June 2021). Age, obesity, comorbidity burden, race, and hospitalization for acute COVID-19 infection were associated with greater risk of PASC. Glucocorticoid (GC) use (aHR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.34 compared to no use) was associated with greater risk of PASC. CONCLUSION: Among patients with rheumatic diseases, following their first COVID-19 infection, we found a decreased risk of PASC over calendar time using an EHR-based definition. Aside from GCs, no specific immunomodulatory medications were associated with increased risk, and risk factors were otherwise similar to those seen in the general population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Electronic Health Records , Rheumatic Diseases , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Rheumatic Diseases/complications , Aged , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Autoimmune Diseases/complications , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Comorbidity
2.
Curr Rheumatol Rep ; 2024 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093508

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this review paper is to summarize the main research and findings regarding air pollution and its association with the risk and progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RECENT FINDINGS: The most studied components of air pollution included particulate matter of ≤ 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), PM10, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), nitric oxide (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ozone (O3). In addition, specific occupations and occupational inhalants have been investigated for RA risk. Several studies showed that increased exposure to air pollutants increased the risk of developing RA, particularly seropositive RA. There was evidence of gene-inhalant interactions for seropositive RA risk. Fewer studies have been conducted on RA disease activity and bone erosions. Some studies suggest that patients with RA-associated interstitial lung disease may have worse outcomes if exposed to air pollution. We summarized associations between air pollution and increased RA risk, including RA-associated interstitial lung disease. Relatively few studies investigated air pollution and RA disease activity or other outcomes. These results suggest an important role of air pollution for seropositive RA development and suggest that climate change could be a driver in increasing RA incidence as air pollution increases.

4.
Lancet Rheumatol ; 6(1): e21-e30, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258675

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) might have blunted responses to COVID-19 vaccines. The initial mRNA vaccine series is defined as three doses for this population and a fourth booster dose is recommended. The effectiveness of the fourth dose in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using DMARDs is not well established. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of receiving versus not receiving a fourth dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine using a target trial framework, in a cohort of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases receiving DMARD therapy. METHODS: We conducted an emulated target trial using observational data from the Mass General Brigham health-care system to compare receiving versus not receiving a fourth mRNA vaccine dose. Analysed patients had systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, were prescribed DMARDs, and were eligible for a fourth dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines between Jan 16 and June 11, 2022. To account for temporal changes, the study period was divided into 1-week intervals. Fourth-dose-exposed patients were included in a 1-week interval if they received a fourth mRNA dose in that interval; fourth-dose-unexposed patients were eligible for but had not received the fourth dose of the vaccine. The primary outcome was a SARS-CoV-2 infection; the secondary outcome was severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (ie, admission to hospital or death within -3 to +14 days of a positive test). We assessed the effectiveness of the fourth dose using time-stratified, overlap propensity score-weighted Cox regression models. FINDINGS: We included 4305 patients, 3126 of whom received a fourth dose of vaccine and 1179 who had not. The median follow-up time was 135 days (IQR 112-154) among patients who had received a fourth dose and 65 days (30-156) among patients who had not received a fourth dose. After overlap weighting in both groups, 1863 (72·7%) of 2563 participants were women, 700 (27·3%) were men, and 2242 (87·5%) were White. Rheumatoid arthritis was present in 1392 (54·3%) of 2563 participants; the most frequent treatments were conventional synthetic DMARDs (1489 [58·1%]) or biological DMARDs (1007 [39·3%]). SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was lower among patients receiving versus not receiving a fourth dose of vaccine (HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·47-0·74]). A fourth dose reduced the risk of admission to hospital or death within -3 to +14 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection (0·35 [0·14-0·85]). INTERPRETATION: In this emulated target trial, a fourth dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using DMARDs during the Omicron era. Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases should be encouraged to remain up-to-date with COVID-19 vaccinations. FUNDING: The National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , mRNA Vaccines , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
5.
Clin Rheumatol ; 43(8): 2453-2466, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898318

ABSTRACT

We aimed to determine the prevalence and outcomes for forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVCpp) decline among patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). We identified patients with RA-ILD in the Mass General Brigham Healthcare system. RA-ILD diagnosis was determined by review of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging by up to three thoracic radiologists. We abstracted FVCpp measurements, covariates, lung transplant, and ILD-related death from the medical record. We employed a relative FVCpp decline cutoff of > 10% within 24 months. We also used a group-based trajectory model to obtain patterns of change from RA-ILD diagnosis. We then assessed for associations of each FVC decline definition with risk of lung transplant or ILD-related death using multivariable logistic regression. We analyzed 172 patients with RA-ILD with a median of 6 FVCpp measurements per patient over 6.5 years of follow-up (mean age 62.2 years, 36% male). There were seven (4%) lung transplants and 44 (26%) ILD-related deaths. Ninety-eight (57%) patients had relative decline of FVCpp by > 10% in 24 months. We identified three trajectory groups of FVCpp change: rapidly declining (n = 24/168 [14%]), slowly declining (n = 90/168 [54%]), and stable/improving (n = 54/168 [32%]). The rapidly declining group and FVCpp > 10% had adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for lung transplant/ILD-related death of 19.2 (95%CI 4.9 to 75.5) and 2.8 (95%CI 1.3 to 6.1) respectively. Over half of patients with RA-ILD had declining FVCpp. The different trajectory patterns demonstrate the importance of FVC monitoring for identifying patients at the highest risk of poor outcomes. Key Points • Over half of patients with RA-ILD had declining FVCpp over a median of 6.5 years of follow-up. • The rapidly declining FVCpp trajectory group had stronger associations with lung transplant and ILD-related death compared to those with FVCpp decline by > 10%. • Clinicians can employ FVC monitoring to proactively treat patients who are at risk of poor outcomes.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Lung Transplantation , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/mortality , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/surgery , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/mortality , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Vital Capacity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL